614 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32966113)
1. Screening Mammography Performance Metrics of 2D Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women With a Personal History of Breast Cancer.
Chikarmane SA; Cochon LR; Khorasani R; Sahu S; Giess CS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):587-594. PubMed ID: 32966113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography in a Hybrid Screening Environment.
Giess CS; Pourjabbar S; Ip IK; Lacson R; Alper E; Khorasani R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Oct; 209(4):929-934. PubMed ID: 28639832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frequency and Outcomes of BI-RADS Category 3 Assessments in Patients With a Personal History of Breast Cancer: Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Offit LR; Chikarmane SA; Lacson RC; Giess CS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Sep; 221(3):313-322. PubMed ID: 37095672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Repeat Screening Outcomes with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Synthetic Mammography for Breast Cancer Detection: Results from the Prospective Verona Pilot Study.
Caumo F; Montemezzi S; Romanucci G; Brunelli S; Bricolo P; Cugola L; Gennaro G
Radiology; 2021 Jan; 298(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 33170101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical implementation of synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis in a routine clinical practice.
Freer PE; Riegert J; Eisenmenger L; Ose D; Winkler N; Stein MA; Stoddard GJ; Hess R
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(2):501-509. PubMed ID: 28780702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing Diagnostic Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography.
Cochon LR; Giess CS; Khorasani R
J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Aug; 17(8):999-1003. PubMed ID: 32068009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Synthesized Two-Dimensional Images versus Full-Field Digital Mammography for Population Screening: Outcomes from the Verona Screening Program.
Caumo F; Zorzi M; Brunelli S; Romanucci G; Rella R; Cugola L; Bricolo P; Fedato C; Montemezzi S; Houssami N
Radiology; 2018 Apr; 287(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 29237146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing Tumor Characteristics and Rates of Breast Cancers Detected by Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography.
Dang PA; Wang A; Senapati GM; Ip IK; Lacson R; Khorasani R; Giess CS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):701-706. PubMed ID: 31613659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance of Screening Breast MRI After Negative Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus After Negative Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women at Higher Than Average Risk for Breast Cancer.
Roark AA; Dang PA; Niell BL; Halpern EF; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Feb; 212(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 30540208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Outcomes for One-View Asymmetries Recalled From Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Full-Field Digital Mammography Screening Examinations.
Gong AJ; Nguyen DL; Lee EE; Mullen LA; Myers KS; Oluyemi E; Ambinder EB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Nov; 219(5):724-733. PubMed ID: 35703412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening.
Lee JM; Partridge SC; Liao GJ; Hippe DS; Kim AE; Lee CI; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lehman CD
Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():119-125. PubMed ID: 30807927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories.
Mariscotti G; Durando M; Houssami N; Fasciano M; Tagliafico A; Bosco D; Casella C; Bogetti C; Bergamasco L; Fonio P; Gandini G
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Dec; 166(3):765-773. PubMed ID: 28819781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Digital breast tomosynthesis versus full-field digital mammography: comparison of the accuracy of lesion measurement and characterization using specimens.
Seo N; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Kim H; Moon JH; Gong G; Ahn SH; Son BH
Acta Radiol; 2014 Jul; 55(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 24005560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparing recall rates following implementation of digital breast tomosynthesis to synthetic 2D images and digital mammography on women with breast-conserving surgery.
Yoon JH; Kim EK; Kim GR; Han K; Kim MJ; Park VY; Moon HJ
Eur Radiol; 2020 Nov; 30(11):6072-6079. PubMed ID: 32529566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Imaging characteristics of interval cancers detected on Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT).
Majid SZ; Senapati GM; Lacson R; Chikarmane SA; Giess CS
Clin Imaging; 2024 Mar; 107():110063. PubMed ID: 38232642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Initial experience with combination digital breast tomosynthesis plus full field digital mammography or full field digital mammography alone in the screening environment.
Destounis S; Arieno A; Morgan R
J Clin Imaging Sci; 2014; 4():9. PubMed ID: 24744966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Performance of Wide-Angle Tomosynthesis with Synthetic Mammography in Comparison to Full Field Digital Mammography.
Khanani S; Hruska C; Lazar A; Hoernig M; Hebecker A; Obuchowski N
Acad Radiol; 2023 Jan; 30(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 35491345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective Comparison of Synthesized Mammography with DBT and Full-Field Digital Mammography with DBT Uncovers Recall Disagreements That may Impact Cancer Detection.
Huang ML; Hess K; Ma J; Santiago L; Scoggins ME; Arribas E; Adrada BE; Le-Petross HT; Leung JWT; Yang W; Geiser W; Candelaria RP
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jul; 29(7):1039-1045. PubMed ID: 34538550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing the performance of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the post-treatment surveillance of patients with a history of breast cancer: A retrospective study.
Nia E; Patel M; Kapoor M; Guirguis M; Perez F; Bassett R; Candelaria R
Radiography (Lond); 2023 Oct; 29(6):975-979. PubMed ID: 37572571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
