These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32966284)

  • 1. Evaluation of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure using Corvis ST and comparison of the Corvis ST, noncontact tonometer, and Goldmann applanation tonometer in patients with glaucoma.
    Nakao Y; Kiuchi Y; Okumichi H
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238395. PubMed ID: 32966284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of intraocular pressure obtained by Goldmann applanation tonometer, Corvis ST and an airpuff tonometer in healthy adults.
    Karmiris E; Tsiripidis K; Gartaganis PS; Totou S; Vasilopoulou MG; Patelis A; Giannakis I; Chalkiadaki E
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2021 Dec; ():11206721211069227. PubMed ID: 34955039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Corneal Deformation Parameters Provided by the Corvis-ST Pachy-Tonometer in Healthy Subjects and Glaucoma Patients.
    Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Felletti M; Grasso L; Brusini P
    J Glaucoma; 2015; 24(8):568-74. PubMed ID: 25318572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by Corvis ST and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.
    Ye Y; Yang Y; Fan Y; Lan M; Yu K; Yu M
    J Glaucoma; 2019 Oct; 28(10):922-928. PubMed ID: 31453898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK.
    Bao F; Huang W; Zhu R; Lu N; Wang Y; Li H; Wu S; Lin H; Wang J; Zheng X; Huang J; Li Y; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
    Curr Eye Res; 2020 Feb; 45(2):144-152. PubMed ID: 31869261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of a novel Scheimpflug-based non-contact tonometer in healthy subjects and patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
    Reznicek L; Muth D; Kampik A; Neubauer AS; Hirneiss C
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Nov; 97(11):1410-4. PubMed ID: 23969314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of central corneal thickness on intraocular pressure and comparison of Topcon CT-80 non-contact tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry.
    Mansoori T; Balakrishna N
    Clin Exp Optom; 2018 Mar; 101(2):206-212. PubMed ID: 29044716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of the Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by the Corvis ST and Reichert 7CR Tonometers in Glaucoma Patients.
    Nakao Y; Kiuchi Y; Okimoto S
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(1):e0170206. PubMed ID: 28095506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Pachymetry and intraocular pressure measurement by corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology (Corvis ST): A clinical comparison to the gold standard].
    Steinberg J; Mehlan J; Frings A; Druchkiv V; Richard G; Katz T; Linke SJ
    Ophthalmologe; 2015 Sep; 112(9):770-7. PubMed ID: 25501931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Yanagisawa M; Nakao Y; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Corneal biomechanics and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension and controls.
    Vinciguerra R; Rehman S; Vallabh NA; Batterbury M; Czanner G; Choudhary A; Cheeseman R; Elsheikh A; Willoughby CE
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 104(1):121-126. PubMed ID: 30923134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intraocular pressure measurement with Corvis ST in comparison with applanation tonometry and Tomey non-contact tonometry.
    Luebke J; Bryniok L; Neuburger M; Jordan JF; Boehringer D; Reinhard T; Wecker T; Anton A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 39(11):2517-2521. PubMed ID: 30968328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new tonometer--the Corvis ST tonometer: clinical comparison with noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers.
    Hong J; Xu J; Wei A; Deng SX; Cui X; Yu X; Sun X
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2013 Jan; 54(1):659-65. PubMed ID: 23307970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative analysis of biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure with corneal visualization Scheimpflug technology versus conventional noncontact intraocular pressure.
    Ma J; Wang Y; Hao W; Jhanji V
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Jan; 40(1):117-124. PubMed ID: 31432352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST.
    Tejwani S; Dinakaran S; Joshi A; Shetty R; Sinha Roy A
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 63(11):815-20. PubMed ID: 26669331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
    Shen Y; Su X; Liu X; Miao H; Fang X; Zhou X
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):205. PubMed ID: 27863469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. IOP measurement in silicone oil tamponade eyes by Corvis ST tonometer, Goldmann applanation tonometry and non-contact tonometry.
    Zhang Y; Zheng L; Bian A; Zhou Q
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Apr; 38(2):697-703. PubMed ID: 28444523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical Evaluation of Methods to Correct Intraocular Pressure Measurements by the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Ocular Response Analyzer, and Corvis ST Tonometer for the Effects of Corneal Stiffness Parameters.
    Bao F; Huang Z; Huang J; Wang J; Deng M; Li L; Yu A; Wang Q; Elsheikh A
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Jun; 25(6):510-9. PubMed ID: 26709500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties in glaucoma and control patients by dynamic Scheimpflug corneal imaging technology].
    Coste V; Schweitzer C; Paya C; Touboul D; Korobelnik JF
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2015 Jun; 38(6):504-13. PubMed ID: 25976131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rebound tonometer: ideal tonometer for measurement of accurate intraocular pressure.
    Suman S; Agrawal A; Pal VK; Pratap VB
    J Glaucoma; 2014 Dec; 23(9):633-7. PubMed ID: 23429611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.