These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32966665)

  • 1. Environmental DNA: What's behind the term? Clarifying the terminology and recommendations for its future use in biomonitoring.
    Pawlowski J; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Altermatt F
    Mol Ecol; 2020 Nov; 29(22):4258-4264. PubMed ID: 32966665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trade-offs between reducing complex terminology and producing accurate interpretations from environmental DNA: Comment on "Environmental DNA: What's behind the term?" by Pawlowski et al., (2020).
    Rodriguez-Ezpeleta N; Morissette O; Bean CW; Manu S; Banerjee P; Lacoursière-Roussel A; Beng KC; Alter SE; Roger F; Holman LE; Stewart KA; Monaghan MT; Mauvisseau Q; Mirimin L; Wangensteen OS; Antognazza CM; Helyar SJ; de Boer H; Monchamp ME; Nijland R; Abbott CL; Doi H; Barnes MA; Leray M; Hablützel PI; Deiner K
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Oct; 30(19):4601-4605. PubMed ID: 34036646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using vertebrate environmental DNA from seawater in biomonitoring of marine habitats.
    Sigsgaard EE; Torquato F; Frøslev TG; Moore ABM; Sørensen JM; Range P; Ben-Hamadou R; Bach SS; Møller PR; Thomsen PF
    Conserv Biol; 2020 Jun; 34(3):697-710. PubMed ID: 31729081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why eDNA fractions need consideration in biomonitoring.
    Nagler M; Podmirseg SM; Ascher-Jenull J; Sint D; Traugott M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Oct; 22(7):2458-2470. PubMed ID: 35652762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Capturing open ocean biodiversity: Comparing environmental DNA metabarcoding to the continuous plankton recorder.
    Suter L; Polanowski AM; Clarke LJ; Kitchener JA; Deagle BE
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3140-3157. PubMed ID: 32767849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decision-making and best practices for taxonomy-free environmental DNA metabarcoding in biomonitoring using Hill numbers.
    Mächler E; Walser JC; Altermatt F
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3326-3339. PubMed ID: 33188644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Environmental DNA metabarcoding studies are critically affected by substrate selection.
    Koziol A; Stat M; Simpson T; Jarman S; DiBattista JD; Harvey ES; Marnane M; McDonald J; Bunce M
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2019 Mar; 19(2):366-376. PubMed ID: 30485662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of environmental DNA and bulk-sample metabarcoding using highly degenerate cytochrome c oxidase I primers.
    Macher JN; Vivancos A; Piggott JJ; Centeno FC; Matthaei CD; Leese F
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2018 Nov; 18(6):1456-1468. PubMed ID: 30129704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Environmental DNA metabarcoding: Transforming how we survey animal and plant communities.
    Deiner K; Bik HM; Mächler E; Seymour M; Lacoursière-Roussel A; Altermatt F; Creer S; Bista I; Lodge DM; de Vere N; Pfrender ME; Bernatchez L
    Mol Ecol; 2017 Nov; 26(21):5872-5895. PubMed ID: 28921802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of introduced and resident marine species using environmental DNA metabarcoding of sediment and water.
    Holman LE; de Bruyn M; Creer S; Carvalho G; Robidart J; Rius M
    Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11559. PubMed ID: 31399606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment of stream macroinvertebrate communities with eDNA is not congruent with tissue-based metabarcoding.
    Gleason JE; Elbrecht V; Braukmann TWA; Hanner RH; Cottenie K
    Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3239-3251. PubMed ID: 32799390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aquatic suspended particulate matter as source of eDNA for fish metabarcoding.
    Díaz C; Wege FF; Tang CQ; Crampton-Platt A; Rüdel H; Eilebrecht E; Koschorreck J
    Sci Rep; 2020 Sep; 10(1):14352. PubMed ID: 32873823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integrating eDNA metabarcoding and simultaneous underwater visual surveys to describe complex fish communities in a marine biodiversity hotspot.
    Valdivia-Carrillo T; Rocha-Olivares A; Reyes-Bonilla H; Domínguez-Contreras JF; Munguia-Vega A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2021 Jul; 21(5):1558-1574. PubMed ID: 33683812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long-term data from established survey methods.
    Hänfling B; Lawson Handley L; Read DS; Hahn C; Li J; Nichols P; Blackman RC; Oliver A; Winfield IJ
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jul; 25(13):3101-19. PubMed ID: 27095076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Passive eDNA collection enhances aquatic biodiversity analysis.
    Bessey C; Neil Jarman S; Simpson T; Miller H; Stewart T; Kenneth Keesing J; Berry O
    Commun Biol; 2021 Feb; 4(1):236. PubMed ID: 33619330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Accumulation curves of environmental DNA sequences predict coastal fish diversity in the coral triangle.
    Juhel JB; Utama RS; Marques V; Vimono IB; Sugeha HY; Kadarusman ; Pouyaud L; Dejean T; Mouillot D; Hocdé R
    Proc Biol Sci; 2020 Jul; 287(1930):20200248. PubMed ID: 32635874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Multi-marker eDNA metabarcoding survey to assess the environmental impact of three offshore gas platforms in the North Adriatic Sea (Italy).
    Cordier T; Frontalini F; Cermakova K; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Treglia M; Scantamburlo E; Bonamin V; Pawlowski J
    Mar Environ Res; 2019 Apr; 146():24-34. PubMed ID: 30890270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. eDNA metabarcoding survey reveals fine-scale coral reef community variation across a remote, tropical island ecosystem.
    West KM; Stat M; Harvey ES; Skepper CL; DiBattista JD; Richards ZT; Travers MJ; Newman SJ; Bunce M
    Mol Ecol; 2020 Mar; 29(6):1069-1086. PubMed ID: 32045076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling the ecological status response of rivers to multiple stressors using machine learning: A comparison of environmental DNA metabarcoding and morphological data.
    Fan J; Wang S; Li H; Yan Z; Zhang Y; Zheng X; Wang P
    Water Res; 2020 Sep; 183():116004. PubMed ID: 32622231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monitoring freshwater fish communities in large rivers using environmental DNA metabarcoding and a long-term electrofishing survey.
    Goutte A; Molbert N; Guérin S; Richoux R; Rocher V
    J Fish Biol; 2020 Aug; 97(2):444-452. PubMed ID: 32412670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.