These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32967987)

  • 1. Increased support for standardised packaging in the UK: a longitudinal online survey.
    Moodie C; Best C; Critchlow N; Stead M; Hitchman SC; McNeill A
    Tob Control; 2022 Jan; 31(1):119-120. PubMed ID: 32967987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How tobacco companies in the United Kingdom prepared for, and responded to, standardised packaging of cigarettes and rolling tobacco.
    Moodie C; Angus K; Mitchell D; Critchlow N
    Tob Control; 2018 Jul; 27(e1):e85-e92. PubMed ID: 29321273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prospective longitudinal study of tobacco company adaptation to standardised packaging in the UK: identifying circumventions and closing loopholes.
    Evans-Reeves KA; Hiscock R; Lauber K; Gilmore AB
    BMJ Open; 2019 Sep; 9(9):e028506. PubMed ID: 31551373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The tobacco industry's challenges to standardised packaging: A comparative analysis of issue framing in public relations campaigns in four countries.
    MacKenzie R; Mathers A; Hawkins B; Eckhardt J; Smith J
    Health Policy; 2018 Sep; 122(9):1001-1011. PubMed ID: 30139670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tobacco companies take UK to court over "standardised packaging" regulations.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2015 Dec; 351():h6751. PubMed ID: 26655227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A critical evaluation of the volume, relevance and quality of evidence submitted by the tobacco industry to oppose standardised packaging of tobacco products.
    Hatchard JL; Fooks GJ; Evans-Reeves KA; Ulucanlar S; Gilmore AB
    BMJ Open; 2014 Feb; 4(2):e003757. PubMed ID: 24523419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Legislative provisions for standardised tobacco packaging and changes in public support in 27 European countries.
    Kc S; Filippidis FT; Laverty AA
    Tob Control; 2023 Sep; 32(5):664-666. PubMed ID: 35017263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Standardised tobacco packaging: a health policy case study of corporate conflict expansion and adaptation.
    Hatchard JL; Fooks GJ; Gilmore AB
    BMJ Open; 2016 Oct; 6(10):e012634. PubMed ID: 27855104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Longitudinal evaluation of the impact of standardised packaging and minimum excise tax on tobacco sales and industry revenue in the UK.
    Hiscock R; Augustin NH; Branston JR; Gilmore AB
    Tob Control; 2021 Sep; 30(5):515-522. PubMed ID: 32719111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Use and abuse of statistics in tobacco industry-funded research on standardised packaging.
    Laverty AA; Diethelm P; Hopkinson NS; Watt HC; McKee M
    Tob Control; 2015 Sep; 24(5):422-4. PubMed ID: 25650186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Difference between recommended retail price and sales price for tobacco products in independent and convenience (small) retailers before and after the introduction of standardised tobacco packaging in the UK.
    Critchlow N; Stead M; Moodie C; Angus K; Eadie D; MacKintosh AM
    Tob Control; 2019 Jul; 28(4):449-456. PubMed ID: 30120200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. What comes after standardised packaging for tobacco?
    Hopkinson NS
    BMJ; 2016 May; 353():i2935. PubMed ID: 27221158
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Did independent and convenience (small) retailers comply with standardised tobacco packaging in the UK?
    Critchlow N; Stead M; Moodie C; Eadie D; MacKintosh AM
    Tob Control; 2018 Nov; 27(6):696-697. PubMed ID: 29180533
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of standardised packaging in the UK on warning salience, appeal, harm perceptions and cessation-related behaviours: a longitudinal online survey.
    Moodie C; Best C; Hitchman SC; Critchlow N; MacKintosh AM; McNeill A; Stead M
    Tob Control; 2023 Mar; 32(2):188-194. PubMed ID: 34272338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Tobacco industry-funded research on standardised packaging: there are none so blind as those who will not see!
    Diethelm P; McKee M
    Tob Control; 2015 Mar; 24(e1):e113-5. PubMed ID: 25001359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 'It will harm business and increase illicit trade': an evaluation of the relevance, quality and transparency of evidence submitted by transnational tobacco companies to the UK consultation on standardised packaging 2012.
    Evans-Reeves KA; Hatchard JL; Gilmore AB
    Tob Control; 2015 Jun; 24(e2):e168-77. PubMed ID: 25472733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Four tobacco companies plan action against UK government over standard packaging.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 2015 May; 350():h2865. PubMed ID: 26021709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Plain packaging for tobacco products faces UK legal challenge.
    Yaqub F
    Lancet Respir Med; 2015 Jul; 3(7):511. PubMed ID: 26041402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. UK government may face legal challenge from Philip Morris over plain cigarette packaging.
    O'Dowd A
    BMJ; 2014 Aug; 349():g5172. PubMed ID: 25128487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can't see the woods for the trees: exploring the range and connection of tobacco industry argumentation in the 2012 UK standardised packaging consultation.
    Lie JLY; Fooks G; de Vries NK; Heijndijk SM; Willemsen MC
    Tob Control; 2018 Jul; 27(4):448-454. PubMed ID: 28743794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.