These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32968890)
21. Secondary fracture prevention via a Fracture Liaison Service. Lewiecki EM Womens Health (Lond); 2015 Jun; 11(3):269-71. PubMed ID: 26102465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Hip Fracture--Epidemiology, Management and Liaison Service. Osteoporosis liaison service in Japan]. Suzuki A; Sekiguchi-Ueda S; Kakita A Clin Calcium; 2015 Apr; 25(4):559-63. PubMed ID: 25814017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Experience gained from the implementation of the fracture liaison service in Greece. Makras P; Babis GC; Chronopoulos E; Karachalios T; Kazakos K; Paridis D; Potoupnis M; Tzavellas AN; Valkanis C; Kosmidis C Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Jan; 15(1):12. PubMed ID: 31897772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evidence of effectiveness of a fracture liaison service to reduce the re-fracture rate. Nakayama A; Major G; Holliday E; Attia J; Bogduk N Osteoporos Int; 2016 Mar; 27(3):873-879. PubMed ID: 26650377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Internal Medicine Hospitalists' Perceived Barriers and Recommendations for Optimizing Secondary Prevention of Osteoporotic Hip Fractures. Tan EK; Loh KP; Goff SL South Med J; 2017 Dec; 110(12):749-753. PubMed ID: 29197305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Identifying characteristics of an effective fracture liaison service: systematic literature review. Wu CH; Chen CH; Chen PH; Yang JJ; Chang PC; Huang TC; Bagga S; Sharma Y; Lin RM; Chan DC Osteoporos Int; 2018 May; 29(5):1023-1047. PubMed ID: 29525971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Successful implementation of a Fracture Liaison Service through effective change management: a qualitative study. Wozniak LA; Beaupre LA; Juby A; Kivi P; Majumdar SR; Hanson HM Arch Osteoporos; 2020 Mar; 15(1):44. PubMed ID: 32166431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Fracture liaison service and mortality in elderly hip fracture patients: a prospective cohort study. González-Quevedo D; Bautista-Enrique D; Pérez-Del-Río V; Bravo-Bardají M; García-de-Quevedo D; Tamimi I Osteoporos Int; 2020 Jan; 31(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 31511912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fracture liaison services improve outcomes of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Wu CH; Tu ST; Chang YF; Chan DC; Chien JT; Lin CH; Singh S; Dasari M; Chen JF; Tsai KS Bone; 2018 Jun; 111():92-100. PubMed ID: 29555309 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Fragility Fracture Prevention-Implementing a Fracture Liaison Service in a High Volume Orthopedic Hospital. Pennestrì F; Corbetta S; Favero V; Banfi G Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Dec; 16(24):. PubMed ID: 31817294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Breaking the cycle of recurrent fracture: implementing the first fracture liaison service (FLS) in British Columbia, Canada. Singh S; Whitehurst DG; Funnell L; Scott V; MacDonald V; Leung PM; Friesen K; Feldman F Arch Osteoporos; 2019 Nov; 14(1):116. PubMed ID: 31776684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Fracture liaison programs. Geusens P; Bours SPG; Wyers CE; van den Bergh JP Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol; 2019 Apr; 33(2):278-289. PubMed ID: 31547983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Challenges and opportunities to improve fracture liaison service attendance: fracture registration and patient characteristics and motivations. van den Berg P; van Haard PMM; Geusens PP; van den Bergh JP; Schweitzer DH Osteoporos Int; 2019 Aug; 30(8):1597-1606. PubMed ID: 31129686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [FLS - three letters alter secondary fracture prevention]. Suhm N; Meier C; Kraenzlin M; Kungler E; Savic B; Mueller S; Jakob M; Rikli D Unfallchirurg; 2016 Jan; 119(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 26676632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical effectiveness of osteoporosis treatment in older patients: A fracture liaison service-based prospective study. Mugnier B; Daumas A; Couderc AL; Mizzi B; González T; Amrani A; Lévêque P; Aymes B; Argenson JN; Villani P J Women Aging; 2019; 31(6):553-565. PubMed ID: 30295566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Impact of the implementation of a Fracture Liaison Service on pharmaceutical expenses for osteoporosis compared to an area without an FLS. Naranjo A; Ojeda-Bruno S; Saavedra A; Molina A; Negrín M Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2019 Feb; 19(1):81-87. PubMed ID: 30129375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Implementation of Fracture Liaison Service for a secondary prevention of fragility fracture.]. Yamamoto N Clin Calcium; 2017; 27(9):1241-1246. PubMed ID: 28912386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quality Improvement Initiatives in Fragility Fracture Care and Prevention. Mitchell PJ; Cooper C; Fujita M; Halbout P; Åkesson K; Costa M; Dreinhöfer KE; Marsh DR; Lee JK; Chan DD; Javaid MK Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2019 Dec; 17(6):510-520. PubMed ID: 31734907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fracture Liaison Services in the United Kingdom. Mitchell PJ Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2013 Dec; 11(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 24026314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]