182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32969268)
1. Impact of Young Age and Gender on Outcomes of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access Coronary Angiography.
Singh K; Tavella R; Air T; Worthley M; Sinhal A; Arstall M; Zeitz C; Beltrame J
Angiology; 2021 Mar; 72(3):228-235. PubMed ID: 32969268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of arterial access site selection on outcomes in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: are the results of randomized trials achievable in clinical practice?
Mamas MA; Ratib K; Routledge H; Neyses L; Fraser DG; de Belder M; Ludman PF; Nolan J;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Jul; 6(7):698-706. PubMed ID: 23769648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of Sex on Comparative Outcomes of Radial Versus Femoral Access in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Invasive Management: Data From the Randomized MATRIX-Access Trial.
Gargiulo G; Ariotti S; Vranckx P; Leonardi S; Frigoli E; Ciociano N; Tumscitz C; Tomassini F; Calabrò P; Garducci S; Crimi G; Andò G; Ferrario M; Limbruno U; Cortese B; Sganzerla P; Lupi A; Russo F; Garbo R; Ausiello A; Zavalloni D; Sardella G; Esposito G; Santarelli A; Tresoldi S; Nazzaro MS; Zingarelli A; Petronio AS; Windecker S; da Costa BR; Valgimigli M
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Jan; 11(1):36-50. PubMed ID: 29301646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of Access Site on Bleeding and Ischemic Events in Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Treated With Prasugrel: The ACCOAST Access Substudy.
Porto I; Bolognese L; Dudek D; Goldstein P; Hamm C; Tanguay JF; Ten Berg J; Widimský P; Le Gall N; Zagar AJ; LeNarz LA; Miller D; Montalescot G;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 May; 9(9):897-907. PubMed ID: 27151605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transradial Versus Transfemoral Access for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Bajaj A; Pancholy S; Sothwal A; Nawaz Y; Boruah P
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2019 Sep; 20(9):790-798. PubMed ID: 30442537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Left main percutaneous coronary intervention-Radial versus femoral access: A systematic analysis.
Goel S; Pasam RT; Raheja H; Gotesman J; Gidwani U; Ahuja KR; Reed G; Puri R; Khatri JK; Kapadia SR
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 95(7):E201-E213. PubMed ID: 31430040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Safety of transradial access compared to transfemoral access with hemostatic devices (vessel plugs and suture devices) after percutaneous coronary interventions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Chugh Y; Bavishi C; Mojadidi MK; Elgendy IY; Faillace RT; Brilakis ES; Tamis-Holland J; Mamas M; Chugh SK
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Aug; 96(2):285-295. PubMed ID: 32521099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Full conversion from transfemoral to transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions results in a similar success rate and a rapid reduction of in-hospital cardiac and vascular major events.
Dangoisse V; Guédès A; Gabriel L; Jamart J; Chenu P; Marchandise B; Schroeder E
EuroIntervention; 2013 Jul; 9(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 23872649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cardiac Catheterizations in Patients With Prior Coronary Bypass Surgery: Impact of Access Strategy on Short-Term Safety and Long-Term Efficacy Outcomes.
Groenland FT; Wilschut JM; van den Oord SC; Kardys I; Diletti R; de Jaegere PP; Zijlstra F; Daemen J; Van Mieghem NM; Dekker WKD
Angiology; 2021 May; 72(5):465-473. PubMed ID: 33464117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Access Site Practice on Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Following Thrombolysis for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in the United Kingdom: An Insight From the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Dataset.
Rashid M; Rushton CA; Kwok CS; Kinnaird T; Kontopantelis E; Olier I; Ludman P; De Belder MA; Nolan J; Mamas MA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Nov; 10(22):2258-2265. PubMed ID: 29169494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Transfemoral approach with systematic use of FemoSeal™ closure device compared to transradial approach in primary angioplasty.
Alonzo A; Rigattieri S; Giovannelli F; Di Russo C; Sciahbasi A; Berni A; Volpe M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):849-54. PubMed ID: 26104978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice.
Barbash IM; Minha S; Gallino R; Lager R; Badr S; Loh JP; Kitabata H; Pendyala LK; Torguson R; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 24746598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transition Towards Transradial Approach Improves Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction PCI.
Kalpak O; Donev D; Pejkov H; Antov S; Kalpak G; Kedev S
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2017 Sep; 38(2):69-78. PubMed ID: 28991770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects on Mortality and Major Bleeding of Radial Versus Femoral Artery Access for Coronary Angiography or Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data From 7 Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trials.
Gargiulo G; Giacoppo D; Jolly SS; Cairns J; Le May M; Bernat I; Romagnoli E; Rao SV; van Leeuwen MAH; Mehta SR; Bertrand OF; Wells GA; Meijers TA; Siontis GCM; Esposito G; Windecker S; Jüni P; Valgimigli M;
Circulation; 2022 Nov; 146(18):1329-1343. PubMed ID: 36036610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Association of radial versus femoral access with contrast-induced acute kidney injury in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Kolte D; Spence N; Puthawala M; Hyder O; Tuohy CP; Davidson CB; Sheldon MW; Laskey WK; Abbott JD
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):546-551. PubMed ID: 27566903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative Efficacy of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Approach for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
Schussler JM; Vasudevan A; von Bose LJ; Won JI; McCullough PA
Am J Cardiol; 2016 Aug; 118(4):482-8. PubMed ID: 27378143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transulnar versus transradial access for coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Dahal K; Rijal J; Lee J; Korr KS; Azrin M
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Apr; 87(5):857-65. PubMed ID: 26332022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of age on access site-related outcomes in 469,983 percutaneous coronary intervention procedures: Insights from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.
Anderson SG; Ratib K; Myint PK; Keavney B; Kwok CS; Zaman A; Ludman PF; de Belder MA; Nolan J; Mamas MA; ;
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Nov; 86(6):965-72. PubMed ID: 25676689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of access site, gender, and indication on clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention: Insights from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS).
Kwok CS; Kontopantelis E; Kunadian V; Anderson S; Ratib K; Sperrin M; Zaman A; Ludman PF; de Belder MA; Nolan J; Mamas MA; ;
Am Heart J; 2015 Jul; 170(1):164-72, 172.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26093878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Health Economic Analysis of Access Site Practice in England During Changes in Practice: Insights From the British Cardiovascular Interventional Society.
Mamas MA; Tosh J; Hulme W; Hoskins N; Bungey G; Ludman P; de Belder M; Kwok CS; Verin N; Kinnaird T; Bennett E; Curzen N; Nolan J; Kontopantelis E
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2018 May; 11(5):e004482. PubMed ID: 29743163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
