BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32970522)

  • 1. Relative efficiency of equal versus unequal cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters.
    Liu J; Xiong C; Liu L; Wang G; Jingqin L; Gao F; Chen L; Li Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2021 Mar; 31(2):191-206. PubMed ID: 32970522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size calculation in three-level cluster randomized trials using generalized estimating equation models.
    Liu J; Colditz GA
    Stat Med; 2020 Oct; 39(24):3347-3372. PubMed ID: 32720717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative efficiency of unequal versus equal cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials using generalized estimating equation models.
    Liu J; Colditz GA
    Biom J; 2018 May; 60(3):616-638. PubMed ID: 29577363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Small sample performance of bias-corrected sandwich estimators for cluster-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Li P; Redden DT
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 25345738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal designs in three-level cluster randomized trials with a binary outcome.
    Liu J; Liu L; Colditz GA
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(20):3733-3746. PubMed ID: 31162709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of unequal cluster sizes for GEE analyses of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Tian Z; Preisser JS; Esserman D; Turner EL; Rathouz PJ; Li F
    Biom J; 2022 Mar; 64(3):419-439. PubMed ID: 34596912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Design and analysis of cluster randomized trials with time-to-event outcomes under the additive hazards mixed model.
    Blaha O; Esserman D; Li F
    Stat Med; 2022 Oct; 41(24):4860-4885. PubMed ID: 35908796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Relative efficiency of unequal cluster sizes in stepped wedge and other trial designs under longitudinal or cross-sectional sampling.
    Girling AJ
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(30):4652-4664. PubMed ID: 30209812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power and sample size calculations for cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes when intracluster correlation coefficients vary by treatment arm.
    Kennedy-Shaffer L; Hughes MD
    Clin Trials; 2022 Feb; 19(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 34879711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving sandwich variance estimation for marginal Cox analysis of cluster randomized trials.
    Wang X; Turner EL; Li F
    Biom J; 2023 Mar; 65(3):e2200113. PubMed ID: 36567265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generalized estimating equations in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: Review of practice and simulation study.
    Huang S; Fiero MH; Bell ML
    Clin Trials; 2016 Aug; 13(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 27094487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome.
    Kristunas CA; Smith KL; Gray LJ
    Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):109. PubMed ID: 28270224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative efficiency and sample size for cluster randomized trials with variable cluster sizes.
    You Z; Williams OD; Aban I; Kabagambe EK; Tiwari HK; Cutter G
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 21163852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing denominator degrees of freedom approximations for the generalized linear mixed model in analyzing binary outcome in small sample cluster-randomized trials.
    Li P; Redden DT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():38. PubMed ID: 25899170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative Efficiency of Unequal Versus Equal Cluster Sizes for the Nonparametric Weighted Sign Test Estimators in Clustered Binary Data.
    Ahn C; Hu F; Lee SC
    Drug Inf J; 2012 Jul; 46(4):428-433. PubMed ID: 23486929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods for dealing with unequal cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials: A scoping review.
    Zhan D; Xu L; Ouyang Y; Sawatzky R; Wong H
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0255389. PubMed ID: 34324593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal design of longitudinal data analysis using generalized estimating equation models.
    Liu J; Colditz GA
    Biom J; 2017 Mar; 59(2):315-330. PubMed ID: 27878852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cluster randomised trials with a binary outcome and a small number of clusters: comparison of individual and cluster level analysis method.
    Thompson JA; Leyrat C; Fielding KL; Hayes RJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):222. PubMed ID: 35962318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.
    Martin JT; Hemming K; Girling A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):123. PubMed ID: 31200640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.