These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32970522)

  • 1. Relative efficiency of equal versus unequal cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters.
    Liu J; Xiong C; Liu L; Wang G; Jingqin L; Gao F; Chen L; Li Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2021 Mar; 31(2):191-206. PubMed ID: 32970522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sample size calculation in three-level cluster randomized trials using generalized estimating equation models.
    Liu J; Colditz GA
    Stat Med; 2020 Oct; 39(24):3347-3372. PubMed ID: 32720717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative efficiency of unequal versus equal cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials using generalized estimating equation models.
    Liu J; Colditz GA
    Biom J; 2018 May; 60(3):616-638. PubMed ID: 29577363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Small sample performance of bias-corrected sandwich estimators for cluster-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Li P; Redden DT
    Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 25345738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal designs in three-level cluster randomized trials with a binary outcome.
    Liu J; Liu L; Colditz GA
    Stat Med; 2019 Sep; 38(20):3733-3746. PubMed ID: 31162709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of unequal cluster sizes for GEE analyses of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes.
    Tian Z; Preisser JS; Esserman D; Turner EL; Rathouz PJ; Li F
    Biom J; 2022 Mar; 64(3):419-439. PubMed ID: 34596912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Design and analysis of cluster randomized trials with time-to-event outcomes under the additive hazards mixed model.
    Blaha O; Esserman D; Li F
    Stat Med; 2022 Oct; 41(24):4860-4885. PubMed ID: 35908796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
    Westgate PM
    Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power and sample size calculations for cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes when intracluster correlation coefficients vary by treatment arm.
    Kennedy-Shaffer L; Hughes MD
    Clin Trials; 2022 Feb; 19(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 34879711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving sandwich variance estimation for marginal Cox analysis of cluster randomized trials.
    Wang X; Turner EL; Li F
    Biom J; 2023 Mar; 65(3):e2200113. PubMed ID: 36567265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Relative efficiency of unequal cluster sizes in stepped wedge and other trial designs under longitudinal or cross-sectional sampling.
    Girling AJ
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(30):4652-4664. PubMed ID: 30209812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Generalized estimating equations in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: Review of practice and simulation study.
    Huang S; Fiero MH; Bell ML
    Clin Trials; 2016 Aug; 13(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 27094487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An imbalance in cluster sizes does not lead to notable loss of power in cross-sectional, stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials with a continuous outcome.
    Kristunas CA; Smith KL; Gray LJ
    Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):109. PubMed ID: 28270224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relative efficiency and sample size for cluster randomized trials with variable cluster sizes.
    You Z; Williams OD; Aban I; Kabagambe EK; Tiwari HK; Cutter G
    Clin Trials; 2011 Feb; 8(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 21163852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing denominator degrees of freedom approximations for the generalized linear mixed model in analyzing binary outcome in small sample cluster-randomized trials.
    Li P; Redden DT
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():38. PubMed ID: 25899170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relative Efficiency of Unequal Versus Equal Cluster Sizes for the Nonparametric Weighted Sign Test Estimators in Clustered Binary Data.
    Ahn C; Hu F; Lee SC
    Drug Inf J; 2012 Jul; 46(4):428-433. PubMed ID: 23486929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Methods for dealing with unequal cluster sizes in cluster randomized trials: A scoping review.
    Zhan D; Xu L; Ouyang Y; Sawatzky R; Wong H
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0255389. PubMed ID: 34324593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal design of longitudinal data analysis using generalized estimating equation models.
    Liu J; Colditz GA
    Biom J; 2017 Mar; 59(2):315-330. PubMed ID: 27878852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cluster randomised trials with a binary outcome and a small number of clusters: comparison of individual and cluster level analysis method.
    Thompson JA; Leyrat C; Fielding KL; Hayes RJ
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):222. PubMed ID: 35962318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.
    Martin JT; Hemming K; Girling A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):123. PubMed ID: 31200640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.