192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32970526)
1. Comparison of small-sample standard-error corrections for generalised estimating equations in stepped wedge cluster randomised trials with a binary outcome: A simulation study.
Thompson JA; Hemming K; Forbes A; Fielding K; Hayes R
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Feb; 30(2):425-439. PubMed ID: 32970526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cluster randomised trials with a binary outcome and a small number of clusters: comparison of individual and cluster level analysis method.
Thompson JA; Leyrat C; Fielding KL; Hayes RJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):222. PubMed ID: 35962318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Small sample performance of bias-corrected sandwich estimators for cluster-randomized trials with binary outcomes.
Li P; Redden DT
Stat Med; 2015 Jan; 34(2):281-96. PubMed ID: 25345738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimum number of clusters and comparison of analysis methods for cross sectional stepped wedge cluster randomised trials with binary outcomes: A simulation study.
Barker D; D'Este C; Campbell MJ; McElduff P
Trials; 2017 Mar; 18(1):119. PubMed ID: 28279222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of bias-corrected covariance estimators for generalized estimating equations.
Fan C; Zhang D; Zhang CH
J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(5):1172-87. PubMed ID: 23957522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite-sample corrected generalized estimating equation of population average treatment effects in stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
Scott JM; deCamp A; Juraska M; Fay MP; Gilbert PB
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):583-597. PubMed ID: 25267551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. GEEMAEE: A SAS macro for the analysis of correlated outcomes based on GEE and finite-sample adjustments with application to cluster randomized trials.
Zhang Y; Preisser JS; Li F; Turner EL; Toles M; Rathouz PJ
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2023 Mar; 230():107362. PubMed ID: 36709555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the performance of Bayesian and restricted maximum likelihood estimation for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters.
Grantham KL; Kasza J; Heritier S; Carlin JB; Forbes AB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):112. PubMed ID: 35418034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maintaining the validity of inference in small-sample stepped wedge cluster randomized trials with binary outcomes when using generalized estimating equations.
Ford WP; Westgate PM
Stat Med; 2020 Sep; 39(21):2779-2792. PubMed ID: 32578264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of number of clusters and magnitude of within-cluster homogeneity in outcomes on the performance of four variance estimators for a marginal multivariable Cox regression model fit to clustered data in the context of observational research.
Austin PC
Stat Med; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38822699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A readily available improvement over method of moments for intra-cluster correlation estimation in the context of cluster randomized trials and fitting a GEE-type marginal model for binary outcomes.
Westgate PM
Clin Trials; 2019 Feb; 16(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 30295512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Generalized estimating equations in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters: Review of practice and simulation study.
Huang S; Fiero MH; Bell ML
Clin Trials; 2016 Aug; 13(4):445-9. PubMed ID: 27094487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of bias-corrected empirical covariance estimators with generalized estimating equations in small-sample longitudinal study settings.
Ford WP; Westgate PM
Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(28):4318-4329. PubMed ID: 30073684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Improved standard error estimator for maintaining the validity of inference in cluster randomized trials with a small number of clusters.
Ford WP; Westgate PM
Biom J; 2017 May; 59(3):478-495. PubMed ID: 28128854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Maintaining the validity of inference from linear mixed models in stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials under misspecified random-effects structures.
Ouyang Y; Taljaard M; Forbes AB; Li F
Stat Methods Med Res; 2024 May; ():9622802241248382. PubMed ID: 38807552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Power calculation for detecting interaction effect in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: an important tool for disparity research.
Yang C; Berkalieva A; Mazumdar M; Kwon D
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2024 Mar; 24(1):57. PubMed ID: 38431550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of bias-corrected covariance estimators for MMRM analysis in longitudinal data with dropouts.
Gosho M; Hirakawa A; Noma H; Maruo K; Sato Y
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2389-2406. PubMed ID: 26265765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of varying cluster size in cross-sectional stepped-wedge cluster randomised trials.
Martin JT; Hemming K; Girling A
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jun; 19(1):123. PubMed ID: 31200640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sample size determination for GEE analyses of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.
Li F; Turner EL; Preisser JS
Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1450-1458. PubMed ID: 29921006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite-sample adjustments in variance estimators for clustered competing risks regression.
Chen X; Li F
Stat Med; 2022 Jun; 41(14):2645-2664. PubMed ID: 35288959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
