These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32970879)
1. Improving area of occupancy estimates for parapatric species using distribution models and support vector machines. Kass JM; Meenan SI; Tinoco N; Burneo SF; Anderson RP Ecol Appl; 2021 Jan; 31(1):e02228. PubMed ID: 32970879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Integrating habitat-masked range maps with quantifications of prevalence to estimate area of occupancy in IUCN assessments. Anderson RP Conserv Biol; 2023 Feb; 37(1):e14019. PubMed ID: 36285611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scaling range sizes to threats for robust predictions of risks to biodiversity. Keith DA; Akçakaya HR; Murray NJ Conserv Biol; 2018 Apr; 32(2):322-332. PubMed ID: 28703324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Least concern to endangered: Applying climate change projections profoundly influences the extinction risk assessment for wild Arabica coffee. Moat J; Gole TW; Davis AP Glob Chang Biol; 2019 Feb; 25(2):390-403. PubMed ID: 30650240 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measuring Terrestrial Area of Habitat (AOH) and Its Utility for the IUCN Red List. Brooks TM; Pimm SL; Akçakaya HR; Buchanan GM; Butchart SHM; Foden W; Hilton-Taylor C; Hoffmann M; Jenkins CN; Joppa L; Li BV; Menon V; Ocampo-Peñuela N; Rondinini C Trends Ecol Evol; 2019 Nov; 34(11):977-986. PubMed ID: 31324345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Refining area of occupancy to address the modifiable areal unit problem in ecology and conservation. Moat J; Bachman SP; Field R; Boyd DS Conserv Biol; 2018 Dec; 32(6):1278-1289. PubMed ID: 29797481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Species conservation profiles of the endemic spiders Milano F; Borio L; Komposch C; Mammola S; Pantini P; Pavlek M; Isaia M Biodivers Data J; 2022; 10():e87261. PubMed ID: 36761670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Distribution, conservation status and proposed measures for preservation of Collado GA; Salvador RB; Vidal M; Parra Aravena F; Delgado V; Torres-Díaz C PeerJ; 2023; 11():e14027. PubMed ID: 36643651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Does scale matter? A systematic review of incorporating biological realism when predicting changes in species distributions. Record S; Strecker A; Tuanmu MN; Beaudrot L; Zarnetske P; Belmaker J; Gerstner B PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194650. PubMed ID: 29652936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Habitat availability and gene flow influence diverging local population trajectories under scenarios of climate change: a place-based approach. Schwalm D; Epps CW; Rodhouse TJ; Monahan WB; Castillo JA; Ray C; Jeffress MR Glob Chang Biol; 2016 Apr; 22(4):1572-84. PubMed ID: 26667878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incorporating eco-evolutionary information into species distribution models provides comprehensive predictions of species range shifts under climate change. Lu WX; Wang ZZ; Hu XY; Rao GY Sci Total Environ; 2024 Feb; 912():169501. PubMed ID: 38145682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Species conservation profiles of tarantula spiders (Araneae, Theraphosidae) listed on CITES. Fukushima C; Mendoza JI; West RC; Longhorn SJ; Rivera E; Cooper EWT; Hénaut Y; Henriques S; Cardoso P Biodivers Data J; 2019; 7():e39342. PubMed ID: 31749657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can dynamic occupancy models improve predictions of species' range dynamics? A test using Swiss birds. Briscoe NJ; Zurell D; Elith J; König C; Fandos G; Malchow AK; Kéry M; Schmid H; Guillera-Arroita G Glob Chang Biol; 2021 Sep; 27(18):4269-4282. PubMed ID: 34037281 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The non-Haplochromis fish fauna in Uganda: an update on the distribution and a review of data gaps. Akoth D; Natugonza V; Efitre J; Muyodi FJ; Musinguzi L Environ Monit Assess; 2023 Feb; 195(3):412. PubMed ID: 36805340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Population dynamics can be more important than physiological limits for determining range shifts under climate change. Fordham DA; Mellin C; Russell BD; Akçakaya RH; Bradshaw CJ; Aiello-Lammens ME; Caley JM; Connell SD; Mayfield S; Shepherd SA; Brook BW Glob Chang Biol; 2013 Oct; 19(10):3224-37. PubMed ID: 23907833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Species distribution models contribute to determine the effect of climate and interspecific interactions in moving hybrid zones. Engler JO; Rödder D; Elle O; Hochkirch A; Secondi J J Evol Biol; 2013 Nov; 26(11):2487-96. PubMed ID: 24016292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of alternative metrics on estimates of extent of occurrence for extinction risk assessment. Joppa LN; Butchart SH; Hoffmann M; Bachman SP; Akçakaya HR; Moat JF; Böhm M; Holland RA; Newton A; Polidoro B; Hughes A Conserv Biol; 2016 Apr; 30(2):362-70. PubMed ID: 26183938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patterns and biases of climate change threats in the IUCN Red List. Trull N; Böhm M; Carr J Conserv Biol; 2018 Feb; 32(1):135-147. PubMed ID: 28861903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]