134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32971582)
1. Effective mobilization with etoposide and cyclophosphamide for collection of peripheral blood stem cell in patients with multiple myeloma.
Wang X; Zhang Y; Fan T; Liu H; Wang M; Liu H; Zhang M; He P
Clin Invest Med; 2020 Sep; 43(3):E27-32. PubMed ID: 32971582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Efficacy and Safety of Etoposide Combined with Cyclophosphamide for Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Multiple Myeloma].
Tu ST; Zhou YL; Li F
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2023 Oct; 31(5):1410-1414. PubMed ID: 37846692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-dose etoposide is an effective and safe protocol for stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
Park Y; Kim DS; Jeon MJ; Lee BH; Yu ES; Kang KW; Lee SR; Sung HJ; Nam MH; Yoon SY; Choi CW; Kang ES; Cho D; Kim K; Kim BS; Kim DW; Kim SJ
J Clin Apher; 2019 Oct; 34(5):579-588. PubMed ID: 31283042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Autologous peripheral blood stem cells mobilization with etoposide plus rhG-CSF versus cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF].
Shi YK; He XH; Han XH; Liu P; Yang JL; Zhou SY; Zhou AP; Zhang CG; Ai B
Ai Zheng; 2003 Dec; 22(12):1311-6. PubMed ID: 14693058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A retrospective analysis of autologous peripheral blood hematopoietic stem cell mobilizations and collections in 149 multiple myeloma patients].
Wang G; Chen W; Li Y; Gao W; Yang G; Li X; Liu J; Yang B
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2015 May; 36(5):367-71. PubMed ID: 26031520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cyclophosphamide plus etoposide is a safe and effective mobilization regimen in patients with multiple myeloma.
Heider M; Grass S; Dill V; Rämisch S; Winter C; Verbeek M; Götze KS; Bassermann F; Jilg S
Transfus Apher Sci; 2021 Oct; 60(5):103197. PubMed ID: 34175195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Recombinant human thrombopoietin improves the efficacy of intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in mobilizing peripheral blood stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma: A cohort study.
Wang G; Chen W; Wu Y; Li Y; Leng Y; Liu A
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(50):e9302. PubMed ID: 29390394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Optimization of mobilization regimes of blood hemopoietic stem cells in patients with multiple myeloma].
Pokrovskaia OS; Mendeleeva LP; Urnova ES; Gaponova TV; Gribanova EO; Alekseeva IV; Drokov MIu; Kalinin NN; Gretsov EM; Kliasova GA; Savchenko VG
Ter Arkh; 2011; 83(7):50-7. PubMed ID: 21894752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A combination of dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide, and cisplatin is less toxic and more effective than high-dose cyclophosphamide for peripheral stem cell mobilization in multiple myeloma.
Corso A; Arcaini L; Caberlon S; Zappasodi P; Mangiacavalli S; Lorenzi A; Rusconi C; Troletti D; Maiocchi MA; Pascutto C; Morra E; Lazzarino M
Haematologica; 2002 Oct; 87(10):1041-5. PubMed ID: 12368158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Analysis of Related Factors of Autologous Peripheral Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization in Patients with Lymphoma and Myeloma].
Yu XQ; Wang LX; Lei F; Lu WP; Fei XM
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Dec; 30(6):1861-1867. PubMed ID: 36476917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prolonged infusion time of cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) as a mobilization regimen may improve mobilization efficiency in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients: a single center experience.
Li Y; Liu J; Huang B; Chen M; Gu J; Li J
Ann Med; 2023; 55(2):2289603. PubMed ID: 38104533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
Lin TL; Wang PN; Kuo MC; Hung YH; Chang H; Tang TC
J Clin Apher; 2016 Oct; 31(5):423-8. PubMed ID: 26340986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Successful peripheral blood stem cell mobilization with etoposide (VP-16) in patients with relapsed or resistant lymphoma who failed cyclophosphamide mobilization.
Reiser M; Josting A; Draube A; Mapara MY; Scheid C; Chemnitz J; Tesch H; Wolf J; Diehl V; Söhngen D; Engert A
Bone Marrow Transplant; 1999 Jun; 23(12):1223-8. PubMed ID: 10414907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cytoreduction of lymphoid malignancies and mobilization of blood hematopoietic progenitor cells with high doses of cyclophosphamide and etoposide plus filgrastim.
Damon L; Rugo H; Tolaney S; Navarro W; Martin T; Ries C; Case D; Ault K; Linker C
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant; 2006 Mar; 12(3):316-24. PubMed ID: 16503501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Efficacy and safety of stem cell mobilization with cyclophosphamide plus etoposide versus cyclophosphamide alone.
Jurczyszyn A; Vesole DH; Gdula-Argasińska J; Giza A; Zawirska D; Baster J; Walter Z; Węglarska D; Dadej A; Castillos JJ; Skotnicki AB
Przegl Lek; 2015; 72(11):606-10. PubMed ID: 27012116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Higher efficacy of intermediate dose cytarabine + G-CSF compared to cyclophosphamide + G-CSF in hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma.
Bogucka-Fedorczuk A; Czyz A; Kalicińska E; Sawicki M; Laszkowska-Lewko M; Wicherska-Pawłowska K; Rybka J; Szeremet A; Prajs I; Szymczak D; Wróbel T
J Clin Apher; 2020 Aug; 35(4):246-254. PubMed ID: 32298020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of engraftment following different stem cell mobilization modalities in patients with multiple myeloma treated with a uniform induction regimen containing bortezomib, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone.
Benyamini N; Avivi I; Dann EJ; Zuckerman T; Lavi N; Katz T
Ann Hematol; 2017 Mar; 96(3):461-467. PubMed ID: 28013359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrospective comparison of mobilization methods for autologous stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma.
Nakasone H; Kanda Y; Ueda T; Matsumoto K; Shimizu N; Minami J; Sakai R; Hagihara M; Yokota A; Oshima K; Tsukada Y; Tachibana T; Nakaseko C; Fujisawa S; Yano S; Fujita H; Takahashi S; Kanamori H; Okamoto S;
Am J Hematol; 2009 Dec; 84(12):809-14. PubMed ID: 19862826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Analysis of Success Rate and Influencing Factors for Collecting Peripheral Blood Hematopoietic Stem Cells by Combination of CTX or E-CHOP Chemotherapy with Mobilization of G-CSF in Patients with Multiple Myeloma].
Chen FZ; Luo YM; Hong Q
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Jun; 26(3):812-816. PubMed ID: 29950225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the efficiency, safety, and survival outcomes in two stem cell mobilization regimens with cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF or G-CSF alone in multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis.
Wang L; Xiang H; Yan Y; Deng Z; Li H; Li X; Liu J
Ann Hematol; 2021 Feb; 100(2):563-573. PubMed ID: 33404694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
