These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32971743)
1. Role of Sensory Evaluation in Consumer Acceptance of Plant-Based Meat Analogs and Meat Extenders: A Scoping Review. Fiorentini M; Kinchla AJ; Nolden AA Foods; 2020 Sep; 9(9):. PubMed ID: 32971743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Profiling the novel plant-based meat alternative category: Consumer affective and sensory response in the context of perceived similarity to meat. Giezenaar C; Orr RE; Godfrey AJR; Maggs R; Foster M; Hort J Food Res Int; 2024 Jul; 188():114465. PubMed ID: 38823862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Descriptive beef flavor and texture attributes relationships with consumer acceptance of US light beef eaters. Miller RK; Luckemeyer TJ; Kerth CR; Adhikari K Meat Sci; 2023 Oct; 204():109252. PubMed ID: 37321053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Plant-Based Cheeses: A Systematic Review of Sensory Evaluation Studies and Strategies to Increase Consumer Acceptance. Short EC; Kinchla AJ; Nolden AA Foods; 2021 Mar; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 33808105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensory characteristics and cross-cultural consumer acceptability of Bulgogi (Korean traditional barbecued beef). Hong JH; Yoon EK; Chung SJ; Chung L; Cha SM; O'Mahony M; Vickers Z; Kim KO J Food Sci; 2011; 76(5):S306-13. PubMed ID: 22417445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The potentials and challenges of using fermentation to improve the sensory quality of plant-based meat analogs. Elhalis H; See XY; Osen R; Chin XH; Chow Y Front Microbiol; 2023; 14():1267227. PubMed ID: 37860141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sensory Evaluation of Plant-Based Meat: Bridging the Gap with Animal Meat, Challenges and Future Prospects. Kumari S; Alam AN; Hossain MJ; Lee EY; Hwang YH; Joo ST Foods; 2023 Dec; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 38201136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensory, emotional, and appropriateness of plant- and meat-based burgers. Sogari G; Grasso S; Caputo V; Gómez MI; Mora C; Schouteten JJ J Food Sci; 2024 May; 89(5):2974-2990. PubMed ID: 38711372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Utilizing Mushrooms to Reduce Overall Sodium in Taco Filling Using Physical and Sensory Evaluation. Wong KM; Decker EA; Autio WR; Toong K; DiStefano G; Kinchla AJ J Food Sci; 2017 Oct; 82(10):2379-2386. PubMed ID: 28857162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Plant-Based Only: Investigating Consumers' Sensory Perception, Motivation, and Knowledge of Different Plant-Based Alternative Products on the Market. Pointke M; Ohlau M; Risius A; Pawelzik E Foods; 2022 Aug; 11(15):. PubMed ID: 35954105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Meat Analogues: Relating Structure to Texture and Sensory Perception. Godschalk-Broers L; Sala G; Scholten E Foods; 2022 Jul; 11(15):. PubMed ID: 35892811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Consumer Sensory Comparisons Among Beef, Horse, Elk, and Bison Using Preferred Attributes Elicitation and Check-All-That-Apply Methods. Popoola IO; Bruce HL; McMullen LM; Wismer WV J Food Sci; 2019 Oct; 84(10):3009-3017. PubMed ID: 31509247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sensory Profile and Consumer Liking of Sustainable Salamis Differing in Wild Boar Meat and Seasoning Ingredients Addition. Freschi P; Braghieri A; Pacelli C; Langella E; Riviezzi AM; Paolino R; Cosentino C Foods; 2023 Mar; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 36900606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Advancements in plant based meat analogs enhancing sensory and nutritional attributes. Jang J; Lee DW NPJ Sci Food; 2024 Aug; 8(1):50. PubMed ID: 39112506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A To KV; Comer CC; O'Keefe SF; Lahne J Front Nutr; 2024; 11():1332765. PubMed ID: 38321991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identifying Key Flavors in Strawberries Driving Liking via Internal and External Preference Mapping. Oliver P; Cicerale S; Pang E; Keast R J Food Sci; 2018 Apr; 83(4):1073-1083. PubMed ID: 29603215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Drivers of Liking in a Model Retorted Creamy Tomato Soup System with Varying Levels of Sodium, Fat, and Herbs. Cox GO; Lee Y; Lee SY J Food Sci; 2019 Sep; 84(9):2610-2618. PubMed ID: 31429488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensory characterization of yellow pea and ground chicken hybrid meat burgers using static and dynamic methodologies. Barker S; McSweeney MB J Food Sci; 2022 Dec; 87(12):5390-5401. PubMed ID: 36302120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification of sensory properties driving consumers' liking of commercially available kale and arugula. Barker S; Moss R; McSweeney MB J Sci Food Agric; 2022 Jan; 102(1):198-205. PubMed ID: 34061358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]