213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32973096)
21. Multiplexed Protease Specificity Profiling Using Isobaric Labeling.
Tucher J; Tholey A
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1574():171-182. PubMed ID: 28315250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Predicting serpin/protease interactions.
Song J; Matthews AY; Reboul CF; Kaiserman D; Pike RN; Bird PI; Whisstock JC
Methods Enzymol; 2011; 501():237-73. PubMed ID: 22078538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Positional proteomics in the era of the human proteome project on the doorstep of precision medicine.
Eckhard U; Marino G; Butler GS; Overall CM
Biochimie; 2016 Mar; 122():110-8. PubMed ID: 26542287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Mixture-based peptide libraries for identifying protease cleavage motifs.
Turk BE
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 539():79-91. PubMed ID: 19377969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Evolutionary optimization of peptide substrates for proteases that exhibit rapid hydrolysis kinetics.
Boulware KT; Jabaiah A; Daugherty PS
Biotechnol Bioeng; 2010 Jun; 106(3):339-46. PubMed ID: 20148412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Rapid identification of highly active and selective substrates for stromelysin and matrilysin using bacteriophage peptide display libraries.
Smith MM; Shi L; Navre M
J Biol Chem; 1995 Mar; 270(12):6440-9. PubMed ID: 7896777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. High resolution analysis of snake venom metalloproteinase (SVMP) peptide bond cleavage specificity using proteome based peptide libraries and mass spectrometry.
Paes Leme AF; Escalante T; Pereira JG; Oliveira AK; Sanchez EF; Gutiérrez JM; Serrano SM; Fox JW
J Proteomics; 2011 Apr; 74(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 21156218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Prediction of substrate specificity in NS3/4A serine protease by biased sequence search threading.
Ozdemir Isik G; Ozer AN
J Biomol Struct Dyn; 2017 Apr; 35(5):1102-1114. PubMed ID: 27122119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Substrate phage as a tool to identify novel substrate sequences of proteases.
Ohkubo S; Miyadera K; Sugimoto Y; Matsuo K; Wierzba K; Yamada Y
Comb Chem High Throughput Screen; 2001 Nov; 4(7):573-83. PubMed ID: 11562260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Novel 2-DE-Based Proteomic Analysis to Identify Multiple Substrates for Specific Protease in Neuronal Cells.
Kim C; Oh YJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1598():229-245. PubMed ID: 28508364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. mRNA-display-based selections for proteins with desired functions: a protease-substrate case study.
Valencia CA; Cotten SW; Dong B; Liu R
Biotechnol Prog; 2008; 24(3):561-9. PubMed ID: 18471027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Characterization of the prime and non-prime active site specificities of proteases by proteome-derived peptide libraries and tandem mass spectrometry.
Schilling O; Huesgen PF; Barré O; Auf dem Keller U; Overall CM
Nat Protoc; 2011 Jan; 6(1):111-20. PubMed ID: 21212787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Substrate profiling of tobacco etch virus protease using a novel fluorescence-assisted whole-cell assay.
Kostallas G; Löfdahl PÅ; Samuelson P
PLoS One; 2011 Jan; 6(1):e16136. PubMed ID: 21267463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Application of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in Phage Displayed Peptide Selection to Support the Identification of Arsenic-Binding Motifs.
Braun R; Schönberger N; Vinke S; Lederer F; Kalinowski J; Pollmann K
Viruses; 2020 Nov; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 33261041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Definition and redesign of the extended substrate specificity of granzyme B.
Harris JL; Peterson EP; Hudig D; Thornberry NA; Craik CS
J Biol Chem; 1998 Oct; 273(42):27364-73. PubMed ID: 9765264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. In vivo selection of protease cleavage sites by using chimeric Sindbis virus libraries.
Pacini L; Vitelli A; Filocamo G; Bartholomew L; Brunetti M; Tramontano A; Steinkühler C; Migliaccio G
J Virol; 2000 Nov; 74(22):10563-70. PubMed ID: 11044100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An Introductory Guide to Protease Sensitive Linker Design Using Matrix Metalloproteinase 13 as an Example.
Hamm P; Meinel L; Driessen MD
ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2024 Jun; 10(6):3693-3706. PubMed ID: 38813796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Methods for mapping protease specificity.
Diamond SL
Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2007 Feb; 11(1):46-51. PubMed ID: 17157549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A bead-based cleavage method for large-scale identification of protease substrates.
Wang C; Ye M; Wei X; Bian Y; Cheng K; Zou H
Sci Rep; 2016 Mar; 6():22645. PubMed ID: 26935269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Modulation of infectivity in phage display as a tool to determine the substrate specificity of proteases.
Chaparro-Riggers JF; Breves R; Maurer KH; Bornscheuer U
Chembiochem; 2006 Jun; 7(6):965-70. PubMed ID: 16642518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
