These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32974059)

  • 1. Web-based Fully Automated Cephalometric Analysis: Comparisons between App-aided, Computerized, and Manual Tracings.
    Meriç P; Naoumova J
    Turk J Orthod; 2020 Sep; 33(3):142-149. PubMed ID: 32974059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing a Fully Automated Cephalometric Tracing Method to a Manual Tracing Method for Orthodontic Diagnosis.
    Tsolakis IA; Tsolakis AI; Elshebiny T; Matthaios S; Palomo JM
    J Clin Med; 2022 Nov; 11(22):. PubMed ID: 36431331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of speed, repeatability, and reproducibility of digital radiography with manual versus computer-assisted cephalometric analyses.
    Uysal T; Baysal A; Yagci A
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 19443692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative evaluation of concordance and speed between smartphone app-based and artificial intelligence web-based cephalometric tracing software with the manual tracing method: A cross-sectional study.
    Gupta S; Shetty S; Natarajan S; Nambiar S; Mv A; Agarwal S
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2024 Jan; 16(1):e11-e17. PubMed ID: 38314342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cephalometric analysis performance discrepancy between orthodontists and an artificial intelligence model using lateral cephalometric radiographs.
    Guinot-Barona C; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J; Galán López L; Barmak AB; Att W; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2024 Apr; 36(4):555-565. PubMed ID: 37882509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of fully automated cephalometric measurements obtained from web-based artificial intelligence driven platform.
    Mahto RK; Kafle D; Giri A; Luintel S; Karki A
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):132. PubMed ID: 35440037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation and comparison of smartphone application tracing, web based artificial intelligence tracing and conventional hand tracing methods.
    Kılınç DD; Kırcelli BH; Sadry S; Karaman A
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Nov; 123(6):e906-e915. PubMed ID: 35901950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of an online website-based platform for cephalometric analysis.
    Alqahtani H
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Feb; 121(1):53-57. PubMed ID: 31059836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reliability Assessment of Orthodontic Apps for Cephalometrics.
    Aksakallı S; Yılancı H; Görükmez E; Ramoğlu Sİ
    Turk J Orthod; 2016 Dec; 29(4):98-102. PubMed ID: 30112482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the accuracy of fully automatic cephalometric analysis software with artificial intelligence algorithm.
    Duran GS; Gökmen Ş; Topsakal KG; Görgülü S
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Aug; 26(3):481-490. PubMed ID: 36648374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A hard tissue cephalometric comparative study between hand tracing and computerized tracing.
    Prabhakar R; Rajakumar P; Karthikeyan MK; Saravanan R; Vikram NR; Reddy A
    J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2014 Jul; 6(Suppl 1):S101-6. PubMed ID: 25210347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between cephalometric measurements using digital manual and web-based artificial intelligence cephalometric tracing software.
    Çoban G; Öztürk T; Hashimli N; Yağci A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2022; 27(4):e222112. PubMed ID: 35976288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The accuracy of cephalometric tracing superimposition.
    Gliddon MJ; Xia JJ; Gateno J; Wong HT; Lasky RE; Teichgraeber JF; Jia X; Liebschner MA; Lemoine JJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Feb; 64(2):194-202. PubMed ID: 16413890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reproducibility of measurements in tablet-assisted, PC-aided, and manual cephalometric analysis.
    Goracci C; Ferrari M
    Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 24160993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the accuracy of automated cephalometric analysis based on artificial intelligence.
    Bao H; Zhang K; Yu C; Li H; Cao D; Shu H; Liu L; Yan B
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Apr; 23(1):191. PubMed ID: 37005593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative Evaluation of Digital Cephalometric Tracing Applications on Mobile Devices and Manual Tracing.
    Hassan MM; Alfaifi WH; Qaysi AM; Alfaifi AA; AlGhafli ZM; Mattoo KA; Daghriri SM; Hawthan LM; Daghriri RM; Moafa AA; Al Moaleem MM
    Med Sci Monit; 2024 Jun; 30():e944628. PubMed ID: 38909276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of the errors in cephalometric measurements on scanned cephalometric images and conventional tracings.
    Sayinsu K; Isik F; Trakyali G; Arun T
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Feb; 29(1):105-8. PubMed ID: 17290023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Manual tracing versus smartphone application (app) tracing: a comparative study.
    Sayar G; Kilinc DD
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2017 Nov; 75(8):588-594. PubMed ID: 28793813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation Analysis of Nasal Septum Deviation and Results of AI-Driven Automated 3D Cephalometric Analysis.
    Kazimierczak N; Kazimierczak W; Serafin Z; Nowicki P; Lemanowicz A; Nadolska K; Janiszewska-Olszowska J
    J Clin Med; 2023 Oct; 12(20):. PubMed ID: 37892759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of Computerized Cephalometric Analysis Software Compared with Conventional Manual Tracing for Analyzing Skeletal Stability After Orthognathic Surgery.
    Thet PH; Kaboosaya B
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2023 Dec; 22(4):833-840. PubMed ID: 38105843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.