166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32974063)
1. Cephalometric Evaluation of Anterior Cranial Base Slope in Patients with Skeletal Class I Malocclusion with Low or High SNA and SNB Angles.
Camcı H; Salmanpour F
Turk J Orthod; 2020 Sep; 33(3):171-176. PubMed ID: 32974063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal jaw base relationship prior to orthognathic surgery: the role of anterior cranial base inclination.
Jünger TH; Ruf S; Eisfeld J; Howaldt HP
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2000; 15(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 11307186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Orthodonticorthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients].
Wang XJ; Zhang YM; Zhou YH
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 30773550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of relationship between cranial base angle and maxillofacial morphology in Indian population: A cephalometric study.
Bhattacharya A; Bhatia A; Patel D; Mehta N; Parekh H; Trivedi R
J Orthod Sci; 2014 Jul; 3(3):74-80. PubMed ID: 25143931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sagittal Cephalometric Evaluation Without Point Nasion: Sagittal G-Triangle Analysis.
Li B; Zhang Z; Lin X; Dong Y
J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Mar-Apr 01; 33(2):521-525. PubMed ID: 34669681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Geometrical Approaches for the Accurate Identification of Normal Vertical Positions of Sella and Nasion Points in Cephalograms.
Jena AK; Nayyer N; Sharan J; Behera BK; Marya A
Int J Dent; 2022; 2022():2705416. PubMed ID: 36466369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Investigation of the Relationship between Sagittal Skeletal Nasal Profile Morphology and Malocclusions: A Lateral Cephalometric Film Study.
Ocak Y; Cicek O; Ozkalayci N; Erener H
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 Jan; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 36766568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes in cranial base morphology in different malocclusions.
Polat OO; Kaya B
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Nov; 10(4):216-21. PubMed ID: 17973688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Skeletal-versus soft-tissue-based cephalometric analyses: is the correlation reproducible?
Ploder O; Köhnke R; Winsauer H; Götz C; Bissinger O; Haller B; Kolk A
Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Mar; 77(2):135-141. PubMed ID: 30394163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of cranial base flexure in developing sagittal jaw discrepancies.
Klocke A; Nanda RS; Kahl-Nieke B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2002 Oct; 122(4):386-91. PubMed ID: 12411884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in class III orthognathic surgery and aesthetic consideration.
Ghassemi M; Ghassemi A; Showkatbakhsh R; Ahmad SS; Shadab M; Modabber A; Jamilian A
Natl J Maxillofac Surg; 2014; 5(2):157-60. PubMed ID: 25937726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Morphometry of the cranial base and the cranial-cervical-mandibular system in young patients with type II, division 1 malocclusion, using tomographic cone beam.
Bedoya A; Landa Nieto Z; Zuluaga LL; Rocabado M
Cranio; 2014 Jul; 32(3):199-207. PubMed ID: 25000162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlation of the cranial base angle and its components with other dental/skeletal variables and treatment time.
Andria LM; Leite LP; Prevatte TM; King LB
Angle Orthod; 2004 Jun; 74(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 15264648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of Palate Repair on Cranial Base and Maxillary Morphology in Patients With Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate.
Liu X; Chen Z
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2018 Nov; 55(10):1367-1374. PubMed ID: 29613840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Saddle angle and maxillary prognathism: a radiological analysis of the association between the NSAr and SNA angles.
Järvinen S
Br J Orthod; 1984 Oct; 11(4):209-13. PubMed ID: 6594162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison between cephalometric measurements using digital manual and web-based artificial intelligence cephalometric tracing software.
Çoban G; Öztürk T; Hashimli N; Yağci A
Dental Press J Orthod; 2022; 27(4):e222112. PubMed ID: 35976288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative assessment of various cephalometric facial planes with intercanine width in orthodontic patients.
Khan EB; Soomar S; Shah M; Fatima S; Khan S; Ahmed Z; Kumar S
J Orthod Sci; 2022; 11():22. PubMed ID: 35754418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does the Eastman correction over- or under-adjust ANB for positional changes of N?
Kamaluddin JM; Cobourne MT; Sherriff M; Bister D
Eur J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 34(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 21926313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cephalometric analysis of adults with Turner syndrome.
Svanberg C; Norevall LI; Ekman B; Wahlberg J; Bågesund M
Swed Dent J; 2016; 40(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 27464380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Facial prognathism and its relation to the cranial base in Brazilian children with Class I malocclusion].
Mestriner Júnior W; Valente A
Rev Odontol Univ Sao Paulo; 1989; 3(2):324-33. PubMed ID: 2639454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
