199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32974635)
1. Assessing Different Approaches to Leveraging Historical Smoking Exposure Data to Better Select Lung Cancer Screening Candidates: A Retrospective Validation Study.
Kats DJ; Adie Y; Tlimat A; Greco PJ; Kaelber DC; Tarabichi Y
Nicotine Tob Res; 2021 Aug; 23(8):1334-1340. PubMed ID: 32974635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Risk prediction models for selection of lung cancer screening candidates: A retrospective validation study.
Ten Haaf K; Jeon J; Tammemägi MC; Han SS; Kong CY; Plevritis SK; Feuer EJ; de Koning HJ; Steyerberg EW; Meza R
PLoS Med; 2017 Apr; 14(4):e1002277. PubMed ID: 28376113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. OWL: an optimized and independently validated machine learning prediction model for lung cancer screening based on the UK Biobank, PLCO, and NLST populations.
Pan Z; Zhang R; Shen S; Lin Y; Zhang L; Wang X; Ye Q; Wang X; Chen J; Zhao Y; Christiani DC; Li Y; Chen F; Wei Y
EBioMedicine; 2023 Feb; 88():104443. PubMed ID: 36701900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implications of Nine Risk Prediction Models for Selecting Ever-Smokers for Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening.
Katki HA; Kovalchik SA; Petito LC; Cheung LC; Jacobs E; Jemal A; Berg CD; Chaturvedi AK
Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jul; 169(1):10-19. PubMed ID: 29800127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Identifying high risk individuals for targeted lung cancer screening: Independent validation of the PLCO
Weber M; Yap S; Goldsbury D; Manners D; Tammemagi M; Marshall H; Brims F; McWilliams A; Fong K; Kang YJ; Caruana M; Banks E; Canfell K
Int J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 141(2):242-253. PubMed ID: 28249359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Deep Learning Using Chest Radiographs to Identify High-Risk Smokers for Lung Cancer Screening Computed Tomography: Development and Validation of a Prediction Model.
Lu MT; Raghu VK; Mayrhofer T; Aerts HJWL; Hoffmann U
Ann Intern Med; 2020 Nov; 173(9):704-713. PubMed ID: 32866413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A simple model for predicting lung cancer occurrence in a lung cancer screening program: The Pittsburgh Predictor.
Wilson DO; Weissfeld J
Lung Cancer; 2015 Jul; 89(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 25863905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and Validation of a Multivariable Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model That Includes Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening Results: A Secondary Analysis of Data From the National Lung Screening Trial.
Tammemägi MC; Ten Haaf K; Toumazis I; Kong CY; Han SS; Jeon J; Commins J; Riley T; Meza R
JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Mar; 2(3):e190204. PubMed ID: 30821827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of lung cancer risk model (PLCO
Lebrett MB; Balata H; Evison M; Colligan D; Duerden R; Elton P; Greaves M; Howells J; Irion K; Karunaratne D; Lyons J; Mellor S; Myerscough A; Newton T; Sharman A; Smith E; Taylor B; Taylor S; Walsham A; Whittaker J; Barber PV; Tonge J; Robbins HA; Booton R; Crosbie PAJ
Thorax; 2020 Aug; 75(8):661-668. PubMed ID: 32631933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting the future risk of lung cancer: development, and internal and external validation of the CanPredict (lung) model in 19·67 million people and evaluation of model performance against seven other risk prediction models.
Liao W; Coupland CAC; Burchardt J; Baldwin DR; ; Gleeson FV; Hippisley-Cox J
Lancet Respir Med; 2023 Aug; 11(8):685-697. PubMed ID: 37030308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing eligibility for lung cancer screening using parsimonious ensemble machine learning models: A development and validation study.
Callender T; Imrie F; Cebere B; Pashayan N; Navani N; van der Schaar M; Janes SM
PLoS Med; 2023 Oct; 20(10):e1004287. PubMed ID: 37788223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selection criteria for lung-cancer screening.
Tammemägi MC; Katki HA; Hocking WG; Church TR; Caporaso N; Kvale PA; Chaturvedi AK; Silvestri GA; Riley TL; Commins J; Berg CD
N Engl J Med; 2013 Feb; 368(8):728-36. PubMed ID: 23425165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Participant selection for lung cancer screening by risk modelling (the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer [PanCan] study): a single-arm, prospective study.
Tammemagi MC; Schmidt H; Martel S; McWilliams A; Goffin JR; Johnston MR; Nicholas G; Tremblay A; Bhatia R; Liu G; Soghrati K; Yasufuku K; Hwang DM; Laberge F; Gingras M; Pasian S; Couture C; Mayo JR; Nasute Fauerbach PV; Atkar-Khattra S; Peacock SJ; Cressman S; Ionescu D; English JC; Finley RJ; Yee J; Puksa S; Stewart L; Tsai S; Haider E; Boylan C; Cutz JC; Manos D; Xu Z; Goss GD; Seely JM; Amjadi K; Sekhon HS; Burrowes P; MacEachern P; Urbanski S; Sin DD; Tan WC; Leighl NB; Shepherd FA; Evans WK; Tsao MS; Lam S;
Lancet Oncol; 2017 Nov; 18(11):1523-1531. PubMed ID: 29055736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 'Reduced' HUNT model outperforms NLST and NELSON study criteria in predicting lung cancer in the Danish screening trial.
Røe OD; Markaki M; Tsamardinos I; Lagani V; Nguyen OTD; Pedersen JH; Saghir Z; Ashraf HG
BMJ Open Respir Res; 2019; 6(1):e000512. PubMed ID: 31803478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. LDCT lung cancer screening in populations at different risk for lung cancer.
Teles GBDS; Macedo ACS; Chate RC; Valente VAT; Funari MBG; Szarf G
BMJ Open Respir Res; 2020 Feb; 7(1):. PubMed ID: 33371010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. USPSTF2013 versus PLCOm2012 lung cancer screening eligibility criteria (International Lung Screening Trial): interim analysis of a prospective cohort study.
Tammemägi MC; Ruparel M; Tremblay A; Myers R; Mayo J; Yee J; Atkar-Khattra S; Yuan R; Cressman S; English J; Bedard E; MacEachern P; Burrowes P; Quaife SL; Marshall H; Yang I; Bowman R; Passmore L; McWilliams A; Brims F; Lim KP; Mo L; Melsom S; Saffar B; Teh M; Sheehan R; Kuok Y; Manser R; Irving L; Steinfort D; McCusker M; Pascoe D; Fogarty P; Stone E; Lam DCL; Ng MY; Vardhanabhuti V; Berg CD; Hung RJ; Janes SM; Fong K; Lam S
Lancet Oncol; 2022 Jan; 23(1):138-148. PubMed ID: 34902336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and Validation of Risk Models to Select Ever-Smokers for CT Lung Cancer Screening.
Katki HA; Kovalchik SA; Berg CD; Cheung LC; Chaturvedi AK
JAMA; 2016 Jun; 315(21):2300-11. PubMed ID: 27179989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Identifying high-risk individuals for lung cancer screening: Going beyond NLST criteria.
Fu M; Travier N; Martín-Sánchez JC; Martínez-Sánchez JM; Vidal C; Garcia M;
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195441. PubMed ID: 29621354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk prediction models versus simplified selection criteria to determine eligibility for lung cancer screening: an analysis of German federal-wide survey and incidence data.
Hüsing A; Kaaks R
Eur J Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 35(10):899-912. PubMed ID: 32594286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selection of individuals for lung cancer screening based on risk prediction model performance and economic factors - The Ontario experience.
Tammemägi MC; Darling GE; Schmidt H; Llovet D; Buchanan DN; Leung Y; Miller B; Rabeneck L
Lung Cancer; 2021 Jun; 156():31-40. PubMed ID: 33887677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
