These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32974752)

  • 1. Comparison of greater curvature and lesser curvature circular-stapled esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy in patients with esophageal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
    Sasaki K; Omoto I; Uchikado Y; Okumura H; Noda M; Tsuruda Y; Kita Y; Arigami T; Mori S; Kurahara H; Nakajyo A; Koriyama C; Natsugoe S; Ohtsuka T
    Surg Today; 2021 Apr; 51(4):575-581. PubMed ID: 32974752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. 21- versus 25-mm Circular Staplers for Cervical Anastomosis: A Propensity-Matched Study.
    Wang J; Yao F; Yao J; Xu L; Qian JL; Shan LM
    J Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 246():427-434. PubMed ID: 31699537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
    Nederlof N; Tilanus HW; Tran TC; Hop WC; Wijnhoven BP; de Jonge J
    Ann Surg; 2011 Aug; 254(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 21725230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Embedded cervical esophagogastrostomy: a simple and convenient method using a circular stapler after esophagectomy for esophageal carcinomas.
    Wu S; Chen M; Wei L; Chen Z
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Sep; 20(9):2984-90. PubMed ID: 23645482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective randomized controlled trial of semi-mechanical versus hand-sewn or circular stapled esophagogastrostomy for prevention of anastomotic stricture.
    Wang WP; Gao Q; Wang KN; Shi H; Chen LQ
    World J Surg; 2013 May; 37(5):1043-50. PubMed ID: 23381675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
    Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
    Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Triangulating stapling vs functional end-to-end stapling for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
    Tsuji T; Ojima T; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Katsuda M; Hayata K; Kitadani J; Maruoka S; Shimokawa T; Yamaue H
    Trials; 2019 Jan; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 30691515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Circular Stapler Method for Avoiding Stricture of Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis.
    Shiraishi O; Yasuda T; Kato H; Momose K; Hiraki Y; Yasuda A; Shinkai M; Imano M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2022 Apr; 26(4):725-732. PubMed ID: 35138510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Double stapling method of anastomosis after esophagectomy with endoscopic stapler to prevent postoperative stricture.
    Murayama I; Sato H; Suzuki T; Ootsuka Y; Song K; Yamagata M; Fukase T; Iwai S
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 1998 Oct; 8(5):295-301. PubMed ID: 9820722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Circular stapling versus triangulating stapling for the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer: A prospective, randomized, controlled trial.
    Hayata K; Nakamori M; Nakamura M; Ojima T; Iwahashi M; Katsuda M; Tsuji T; Kato T; Kitadani J; Takeuchi A; Tabata H; Yamaue H
    Surgery; 2017 Jul; 162(1):131-138. PubMed ID: 28318550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Application of gastroepiploic tunnel esophagogastrostomy in minimally invasive esophagectomy].
    Zhou L; Ge P; Chen J; Wang J; Wang M; Li X; Jiang T
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 19(9):1021-1024. PubMed ID: 27680071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study.
    Xu QR; Wang KN; Wang WP; Zhang K; Chen LQ
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2011 Jun; 15(6):915-21. PubMed ID: 21484495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Outcomes with Semi-mechanical and Circular Stapled Intrathoracic Esophagogastric Anastomosis following Esophagectomy.
    Yanni F; Singh P; Tewari N; Parsons SL; Catton JA; Duffy J; Welch NT; Vohra RS
    World J Surg; 2019 Oct; 43(10):2483-2489. PubMed ID: 31222637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benign anastomotic strictures after transhiatal esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy: risk factors and management.
    Honkoop P; Siersema PD; Tilanus HW; Stassen LP; Hop WC; van Blankenstein M
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jun; 111(6):1141-6; discussion 1147-8. PubMed ID: 8642814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
    Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler.
    Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Uzun E; Berlth F; Staubitz J; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(9):2242-2249. PubMed ID: 33506342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A safe and reproducible anastomotic technique for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: the circular-stapled anastomosis with the trans-oral anvil.
    Campos GM; Jablons D; Brown LM; Ramirez RM; Rabl C; Theodore P
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 Jun; 37(6):1421-6. PubMed ID: 20153660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Circular Stapled Technique Versus Modified Collard Technique for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis After Esophagectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Hosoi T; Abe T; Higaki E; Fujieda H; Nagao T; Ito S; Komori K; Iwase M; Oze I; Shimizu Y
    Ann Surg; 2022 Jul; 276(1):30-37. PubMed ID: 34417369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of anastomotic techniques on postoperative anastomotic complications: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit.
    Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit study group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Sep; 164(3):674-684.e5. PubMed ID: 35249756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.