These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32975602)

  • 1. Laparoscopic cervicopexy for correction of apical genital prolapse in 10 steps: a pilot study.
    Paolo C; Alessandro A; Salucci P; Diego R; Renato S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 May; 32(5):1313-1316. PubMed ID: 32975602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Anatomical outcomes 1 year after pelvic organ prolapse surgery in patients with and without a uterus at a high risk of recurrence: a randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy/cervicopexy and anterior vaginal mesh.
    Bataller E; Ros C; Anglès S; Gallego M; Espuña-Pons M; Carmona F
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 Apr; 30(4):545-555. PubMed ID: 29987345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
    Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Success rates and outcomes of laparoscopic mesh sacrohysteropexy.
    Daniels S; Robson D; Palacz M; Howell S; Nguyen T; Behnia-Willison F
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Apr; 60(2):244-249. PubMed ID: 31840811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Guideline No. 413: Surgical Management of Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse in Women.
    Geoffrion R; Larouche M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2021 Apr; 43(4):511-523.e1. PubMed ID: 33548503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Vaginal Sacral Colpopexy: A Natural Orifice Approach to a Gold Standard Procedure.
    Hanes CR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018 Jan; 25(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 28642090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison between laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy and subtotal hysterectomy plus cervicopexy in pelvic organ prolapse: A pilot study.
    Gracia M; Perelló M; Bataller E; Espuña M; Parellada M; Genís D; Balasch J; Carmona F
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2015 Sep; 34(7):654-8. PubMed ID: 24975722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Ligament Hysteropexy vs Total Vaginal Hysterectomy with Uterosacral Ligament Suspension for Anterior and Apical Prolapse: Surgical Outcome and Patient Satisfaction.
    Haj-Yahya R; Chill HH; Levin G; Reuveni-Salzman A; Shveiky D
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 30802607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Mid-term efficacy of laparoscopic sacral colpopexy of combined transabdominal-transvaginal approach in the treatment of stage Ⅳ pelvic organ prolapse].
    Liang XZ; Xu LZ; Chen LQ; Wang S; Lin XT; Zhang XW
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 54(3):160-165. PubMed ID: 30893716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic lateral suspension for anterior and apical prolapse: a prospective cohort with standardized technique.
    Chatziioannidou K; Veit-Rubin N; Dällenbach P
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Feb; 33(2):319-325. PubMed ID: 33835212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What to Do With Recurrent Prolapse After Vaginal Mesh Failure?
    Norinho de Oliveira P; Bourdel N; Rabischong B; Canis M; Botchorishvili R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 23(2):161-2. PubMed ID: 26408228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mesh-Free Laparoscopic High Uterosacral Ligament Suspension during Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Uterine Prolapse.
    Jan H; Ghai V; Doumouchtsis SK
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2018; 25(6):952-953. PubMed ID: 29274382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic sacrohysteropexy: an instructional video for uterovaginal prolapse repair in patients with desired uterine preservation.
    Warehime J; Cope Z; Feroz R; Lenger SM; Gupta A; Francis S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2022 Dec; 33(12):3585-3586. PubMed ID: 35713673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic lateral suspension with mesh for apical and anterior pelvic organ prolapse: A prospective double center study.
    Mereu L; Tateo S; D'Alterio MN; Russo E; Giannini A; Mannella P; Pertile R; Cai T; Simoncini T
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Jan; 244():16-20. PubMed ID: 31770687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effectiveness of two different laparoscopic surgeries for apical support of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Li S; Ji M; Zhao Z
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():74-8. PubMed ID: 25801721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic repair of vaginal vault prolapse by lateral suspension with mesh.
    Dubuisson J; Eperon I; Dällenbach P; Dubuisson JB
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Feb; 287(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 23001368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic Uterosacral Suture Sacrohysteropexy: LUSSH Procedure.
    Jan H; Ghai V
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 26(2):356-357. PubMed ID: 29631010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The use of one-piece U-shaped mesh and barbed sutures in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    García-Segui A; Lorenzo Soriano L; Costa-Martínez MA; Amorós Torres A; Gilabert A; Oltra MF
    Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed); 2020; 44(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 31806248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Laparoscopic Mesh-Less Cervicosacropexy for Uterovaginal Prolapse.
    Seracchioli R; Raimondo D; Arena A; Gava G; Parmeggiani C; Martelli V; Moro E; Zanello M; Paradisi R; Mabrouk M
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2018; 24(6):399-403. PubMed ID: 28915136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrasonography and robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocervicopexy with pubocervical fascia reconstruction: comparison with standard technique.
    Davila HH; Abdelhameed S; Malave-Huertas D; Bigay FF; Crawford K; Friedenstab A; Lum K; Bruce L; Goodman L; Gallo T
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Oct; 14(5):759-766. PubMed ID: 32062812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.