361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32976064)
1. Reminders of Everyday Misinformation Statements Can Enhance Memory for and Beliefs in Corrections of Those Statements in the Short Term.
Wahlheim CN; Alexander TR; Peske CD
Psychol Sci; 2020 Oct; 31(10):1325-1339. PubMed ID: 32976064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fake news reminders and veracity labels differentially benefit memory and belief accuracy for news headlines.
Kemp PL; Loaiza VM; Wahlheim CN
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21829. PubMed ID: 36528666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Memory and belief updating following complete and partial reminders of fake news.
Kemp PL; Sinclair AH; Adcock RA; Wahlheim CN
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2024 May; 9(1):28. PubMed ID: 38713308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Recalling fake news during real news corrections can impair or enhance memory updating: the role of recollection-based retrieval.
Kemp PL; Alexander TR; Wahlheim CN
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2022 Sep; 7(1):85. PubMed ID: 36114359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the role of memory in misinformation corrections: Repeated exposure, correction durability, and source credibility.
Kemp PL; Goldman AC; Wahlheim CN
Curr Opin Psychol; 2024 Apr; 56():101783. PubMed ID: 38171060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Investigating and Improving the Accuracy of US Citizens' Beliefs About the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitudinal Survey Study.
van Stekelenburg A; Schaap G; Veling H; Buijzen M
J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jan; 23(1):e24069. PubMed ID: 33351776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Memory failure predicts belief regression after the correction of misinformation.
Swire-Thompson B; Dobbs M; Thomas A; DeGutis J
Cognition; 2023 Jan; 230():105276. PubMed ID: 36174261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. When Misinformation Improves Memory.
Putnam AL; Sungkhasettee VW; Roediger HL
Psychol Sci; 2017 Jan; 28(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 27879321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Scrolling through fake news: The effect of presentation order on misinformation retention.
Edelijn Y; Øvreeide VD; Verheyen S
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2024 Mar; 30(1):16-32. PubMed ID: 37227873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Debriefing works: Successful retraction of misinformation following a fake news study.
Greene CM; Murphy G
PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280295. PubMed ID: 36662686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Misinformation and Morality: Encountering Fake-News Headlines Makes Them Seem Less Unethical to Publish and Share.
Effron DA; Raj M
Psychol Sci; 2020 Jan; 31(1):75-87. PubMed ID: 31751517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanisms in continued influence: The impact of misinformation corrections on source perceptions.
Westbrook V; Wegener DT; Susmann MW
Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1317-1330. PubMed ID: 36988856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Keeping track of 'alternative facts': The neural correlates of processing misinformation corrections.
Gordon A; Quadflieg S; Brooks JCW; Ecker UKH; Lewandowsky S
Neuroimage; 2019 Jun; 193():46-56. PubMed ID: 30872047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term effectiveness of inoculation against misinformation: Three longitudinal experiments.
Maertens R; Roozenbeek J; Basol M; van der Linden S
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Mar; 27(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 33017160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vaccination against misinformation: The inoculation technique reduces the continued influence effect.
Buczel KA; Szyszka PD; Siwiak A; Szpitalak M; Polczyk R
PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0267463. PubMed ID: 35482715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Signal Detection Approach to Understanding the Identification of Fake News.
Batailler C; Brannon SM; Teas PE; Gawronski B
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2022 Jan; 17(1):78-98. PubMed ID: 34264150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The continued influence of implied and explicitly stated misinformation in news reports.
Rich PR; Zaragoza MS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-74. PubMed ID: 26147670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Exploring factors that mitigate the continued influence of misinformation.
Kan IP; Pizzonia KL; Drummey AB; Mikkelsen EJV
Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Nov; 6(1):76. PubMed ID: 34837587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experiencing misinformation: The effect of pre-exposure warnings and debunking on psychic beliefs.
Kuhn G; Ortega J; Simmons K; Thomas C; Mohr C
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Jun; 76(6):1445-1456. PubMed ID: 35848541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation.
Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Tang DT
Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1087-100. PubMed ID: 21156872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
