These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32976243)

  • 1. Comparison of coronary angioscopic findings 8 months after stent implantation between two kinds of biodegradable polymer-coated and one durable polymer-coated drug-eluting stent.
    Yasumura K; Shutta R; Matsunaga-Lee Y; Nakamura D; Yano M; Yamato M; Egami Y; Sakata Y; Nishino M; Tanouchi J
    Coron Artery Dis; 2021 Mar; 32(2):91-95. PubMed ID: 32976243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of neointimal coverage between durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents and bioresorbable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents 1 year after implantation using high-resolution coronary angioscopy.
    Nojima Y; Adachi H; Ihara M; Kurimoto T; Okayama K; Sakata Y; Nanto S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Aug; 94(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 30737973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Final 5-Year Report From the COMPARE II Trial (Abluminal Biodegradable Polymer Biolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent).
    Vlachojannis GJ; Smits PC; Hofma SH; Togni M; Vázquez N; Valdés M; Voudris V; Slagboom T; Goy JJ; den Heijer P; van der Ent M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Jun; 10(12):1215-1221. PubMed ID: 28579236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Five-Year Outcomes in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
    Iglesias JF; Heg D; Roffi M; Tüller D; Lanz J; Rigamonti F; Muller O; Moarof I; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Cuculi F; Valgimigli M; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2019 Nov; 8(22):e013607. PubMed ID: 31696762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization: 2-Year Results of the BIOSCIENCE Trial.
    Zbinden R; Piccolo R; Heg D; Roffi M; Kurz DJ; Muller O; Vuilliomenet A; Cook S; Weilenmann D; Kaiser C; Jamshidi P; Franzone A; Eberli F; Jüni P; Windecker S; Pilgrim T
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2016 Mar; 5(3):e003255. PubMed ID: 26979080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biodegradable polymer-coated thin strut sirolimus- -eluting stent versus durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent in the diabetic population.
    Gasior P; Gierlotka M; Szczurek-Katanski K; Osuch M; Roleder M; Hawranek M; Wojakowski W; Polonski L
    Cardiol J; 2021; 28(2):235-243. PubMed ID: 31909473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Angioscopic Comparison of Early- and Mid-Term Vascular Responses Following Treatment of ST-Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction With Biodegradable vs. Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents　- A Prespecified Subanalysis of the MECHANISM AMI RCT.
    Nakatani S; Sotomi Y; Suzuki S; Kobayashi T; Hamanaka Y; Omatsu T; Ishida M; Kakizaki S; Otake H; Morino Y; Higuchi Y;
    Circ J; 2023 Apr; 87(5):619-628. PubMed ID: 36418112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unselected Use of Ultrathin Strut Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stent for Coronary Revascularization.
    Yamaji K; Zanchin T; Zanchin C; Stortecky S; Koskinas KC; Hunziker L; Praz F; Blöchlinger S; Moro C; Moschovitis A; Seiler C; Valgimigli M; Billinger M; Pilgrim T; Heg D; Windecker S; Räber L
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Sep; 11(9):e006741. PubMed ID: 30354590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrathin Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents.
    Kandzari DE; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Massaro JJ; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 72(25):3287-3297. PubMed ID: 30257191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Twelve-month comparative analysis of clinical outcomes using biodegradable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents versus durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents in all-comer patients.
    Abhyankar A; Sandhu MS; Polavarapu RS
    Indian Heart J; 2019; 71(2):149-154. PubMed ID: 31280828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bioresorbable polymer-coated thin strut sirolimus-eluting stent vs durable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stent in daily clinical practice: Propensity matched one-year results from interventional cardiology network registry.
    Gasior P; Gierlotka M; Szczurek-Katanski K; Osuch M; Gnot R; Hawranek M; Gasior M; Polonski L
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Jun; 93(7):E362-E368. PubMed ID: 30298545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ten-Year Clinical Outcomes From a Trial of Three Limus-Eluting Stents With Different Polymer Coatings in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease.
    Kufner S; Joner M; Thannheimer A; Hoppmann P; Ibrahim T; Mayer K; Cassese S; Laugwitz KL; Schunkert H; Kastrati A; Byrne RA;
    Circulation; 2019 Jan; 139(3):325-333. PubMed ID: 30586724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Outcomes of patients treated with a biodegradable-polymer sirolimus-eluting stent versus durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents after rotational atherectomy.
    Mankerious N; Hemetsberger R; Traboulsi H; Toelg R; Abdel-Wahab M; Richardt G; Allali A
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2021 Oct; 110(10):1574-1585. PubMed ID: 33861369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultrathin Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization: 3-Year Outcomes From the Randomized BIOFLOW V Trial.
    Kandzari DE; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Roguin A; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jun; 13(11):1343-1353. PubMed ID: 32499026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical outcomes of biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting BioMatrix stents versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting Xience stents.
    Lee DH; Park TK; Song YB; Chun WJ; Choi RK; Jeong JO; Im ES; Kim SW; Lee JM; Yang JH; Hahn JY; Choi SH; Choi JH; Lee SH; Gwon HC
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183079. PubMed ID: 28797113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Everolimus-Eluting Biodegradable Polymer Versus Everolimus-Eluting Durable Polymer Stent for Coronary Revascularization in Routine Clinical Practice.
    Zanchin C; Ueki Y; Zanchin T; Häner J; Otsuka T; Stortecky S; Koskinas KC; Siontis GCM; Praz F; Moschovitis A; Hunziker L; Valgimigli M; Pilgrim T; Heg D; Windecker S; Räber L
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Sep; 12(17):1665-1675. PubMed ID: 31422088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Subgroup Analysis Comparing Ultrathin, Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.
    Roguin A; Kandzari DE; Marcusohn E; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Massaro JM; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(10):e007331. PubMed ID: 30354631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Final 3-Year Outcome of a Randomized Trial Comparing Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents Using Either Biodegradable Polymer or Durable Polymer: NOBORI Biolimus-Eluting Versus XIENCE/PROMUS Everolimus-Eluting Stent Trial.
    Natsuaki M; Kozuma K; Morimoto T; Kadota K; Muramatsu T; Nakagawa Y; Akasaka T; Igarashi K; Tanabe K; Morino Y; Ishikawa T; Nishikawa H; Awata M; Abe M; Okada H; Takatsu Y; Ogata N; Kimura K; Urasawa K; Tarutani Y; Shiode N; Kimura T
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Oct; 8(10):. PubMed ID: 26446596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Ultrathin, Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents and Thin, Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Calcified or Small Vessel Lesions.
    Dan K; Garcia-Garcia HM; Kolm P; Windecker S; Saito S; Kandzari DE; Waksman R
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Sep; 13(9):e009189. PubMed ID: 32895004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Vascular response to bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent vs. permanent polymer everolimus-eluting stent at 9-month follow-up: an optical coherence tomography sub-study from the CENTURY II trial.
    Kuramitsu S; Kazuno Y; Sonoda S; Domei T; Jinnouchi H; Yamaji K; Soga Y; Shirai S; Ando K; Saito S
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jan; 17(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 26333375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.