These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32976834)

  • 21. Which is the most suitable local anaesthetic when inferior nerve blocks are used for impacted mandibular third molar extraction? A network meta-analysis.
    Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Sánchez-Torres A; Clé-Ovejero A; Coulthard P; Gay-Escoda C; Valmaseda-Castellón E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Nov; 49(11):1497-1507. PubMed ID: 32473767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of the efficacy of 4% articaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 and 2% lidocaine with epinephrine 1:100,000 buccal infiltration for single maxillary molar extraction: a double-blind, randomised, clinical trial.
    Rayati F; Haeri M; Norouziha A; Jabbarian R
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Jul; 59(6):695-699. PubMed ID: 34053801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Anesthetic Effectiveness of Articaine and Lidocaine in Pediatric Patients During Dental Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Taneja S; Singh A; Jain A
    Pediatr Dent; 2020 Jul; 42(4):273-281. PubMed ID: 32847666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Anesthetic comparisons of 4% concentrations of articaine, lidocaine, and prilocaine as primary buccal infiltrations of the mandibular first molar: a prospective randomized, double-blind study.
    Nydegger B; Nusstein J; Reader A; Drum M; Beck M
    J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):1912-6. PubMed ID: 25218523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations.
    Evans G; Nusstein J; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M
    J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 18358883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Efficacy of Articaine versus Lidocaine in Supplemental Infiltration for Mandibular First versus Second Molars with Irreversible Pulpitis: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial.
    Shapiro MR; McDonald NJ; Gardner RJ; Peters MC; Botero TM
    J Endod; 2018 Apr; 44(4):523-528. PubMed ID: 29397214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial on analgesic efficacy of local anesthetics articaine and bupivacaine after impacted third molar extraction.
    Olmedo-Gaya MV; Manzano-Moreno FJ; Muñoz-López JL; Vallecillo-Capilla MF; Reyes-Botella C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec; 22(9):2981-2988. PubMed ID: 29450738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Epinephrine concentration (1:100,000 or 1:200,000) does not affect the clinical efficacy of 4% articaine for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.
    Santos CF; Modena KC; Giglio FP; Sakai VT; Calvo AM; Colombini BL; Sipert CR; Dionísio TJ; Faria FA; Trindade AS; Lauris JR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Dec; 65(12):2445-52. PubMed ID: 18022467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
    Nusstein J; Berlin J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver JM
    Anesth Prog; 2004; 51(4):126-33. PubMed ID: 15675261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Anaesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in children's dentistry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tong HJ; Alzahrani FS; Sim YF; Tahmassebi JF; Duggal M
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2018 Jul; 28(4):347-360. PubMed ID: 29635712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparing anesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine as a supplemental buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar after an inferior alveolar nerve block.
    Haase A; Reader A; Nusstein J; Beck M; Drum M
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2008 Sep; 139(9):1228-35. PubMed ID: 18762633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Success rate of first attempt 4% articaine para-apical anesthesia for the extraction of mandibular wisdom teeth.
    Sawadogo A; Coulibaly M; Quilodran C; Bationo R; Konsem T; Ella B
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 119(6):486-488. PubMed ID: 29936238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Articaine and mepivacaine efficacy in postoperative analgesia for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.
    Colombini BL; Modena KC; Calvo AM; Sakai VT; Giglio FP; Dionísio TJ; Trindade AS; Lauris JR; Santos CF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 16876058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparative study of two local anesthetics in the surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: bupivacaine and articaine.
    Trullenque-Eriksson A; Guisado-Moya B
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2011 May; 16(3):e390-6. PubMed ID: 21196829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of articaine and lidocaine in the pediatric population.
    Smith T; Urquiola R; Oueis H; Stenger J
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 2014 Jan; 96(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 24654413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The efficacy of articaine and lidocaine local anaesthetic in child patients.
    Bonifacio CC
    Evid Based Dent; 2018 Dec; 19(4):105-106. PubMed ID: 30573862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of Articaine and Lidocaine for Buccal Infiltration After Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block For Intraoperative Pain Control During Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery.
    da Silva-Junior GP; de Almeida Souza LM; Groppo FC
    Anesth Prog; 2017; 64(2):80-84. PubMed ID: 28604089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine (both with 1:200,000 epinephrine) for lower third molar removal.
    Gregorio LV; Giglio FP; Sakai VT; Modena KC; Colombini BL; Calvo AM; Sipert CR; Dionísio TJ; Lauris JR; Faria FA; Trindade Junior AS; Santos CF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 18420431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Articaine improves anesthetic achievement for exodontia performed by undergraduate dental students: A clinical comparative study.
    Muhammad ZA; Abdullah RM; Majid OW
    J Dent Educ; 2021 Nov; 85(11):1702-1709. PubMed ID: 34268738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Efficacy and adverse events of 4% articaine compared with 2% lidocaine on primary molar extraction: A randomised controlled trial.
    Massignan C; Silveira Santos P; Cardoso M; Bolan M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2020 Aug; 47(8):1031-1040. PubMed ID: 32383196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.