These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32976924)

  • 1. Response inhibition in the task-switching paradigm.
    Liu H; Zhang Q
    Biol Psychol; 2020 Oct; 156():107954. PubMed ID: 32976924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural correlates of the mechanism underlying negative response repetition effects in task-switching.
    Liu H; Zhang Q
    Brain Cogn; 2020 Nov; 145():105627. PubMed ID: 32980579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of task preparation in task switching as reflected on lateralized readiness potential.
    Hsieh S; Chen P
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jan; 63(1):98-104. PubMed ID: 17027109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Differential Preparation Intervals Modulate Repetition Processes in Task Switching: An ERP Study.
    Wang M; Yang P; Zhao QJ; Wang M; Jin Z; Li L
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2016; 10():57. PubMed ID: 26924974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Examining binding effects on task switch costs and response-repetition effects: Variations of the cue modality and stimulus modality in task switching.
    Kandalowski SRM; Seibold JC; Schuch S; Koch I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1632-1643. PubMed ID: 31820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pre-stimulus EEG effects related to response speed, task switching and upcoming response hand.
    Gladwin TE; Lindsen JP; de Jong R
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Apr; 72(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 16169147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):955-965. PubMed ID: 29642783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reconfiguration of response-set in task switching: Event-related potential evidence.
    Xie L; Cao B; Chen Y; Wu J; Li F
    Eur J Neurosci; 2023 Mar; 57(5):796-808. PubMed ID: 36601787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diversity of the P3 in the task-switching paradigm.
    Gajewski PD; Falkenstein M
    Brain Res; 2011 Sep; 1411():87-97. PubMed ID: 21803343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring individual differences in task switching.
    Li B; Li X; Stoet G; Lages M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():80-95. PubMed ID: 30599293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Inhibition of cued but not executed task sets depends on cue-task compatibility and practice.
    Berger A; Koch I; Kiefer M
    Psychol Res; 2024 Oct; 88(7):2036-2058. PubMed ID: 39080024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Task reconfiguration and carryover in task switching: an event-related potential study.
    Hsieh S; Cheng P
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1084(1):132-45. PubMed ID: 16647689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Component processes underlying voluntary task selection: Separable contributions of task-set inertia and reconfiguration.
    Imburgio MJ; Orr JM
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104685. PubMed ID: 33780751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Neural mechanisms underlying the cost of task switching: an ERP study.
    Li L; Wang M; Zhao QJ; Fogelson N
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(7):e42233. PubMed ID: 22860090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inhibition during task switching is affected by the number of competing tasks.
    Scheil J; Kleinsorge T
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Jan; 52(1):211-224. PubMed ID: 37698800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Advance preparation in task switching: what work is being done?
    Altmann EM
    Psychol Sci; 2004 Sep; 15(9):616-22. PubMed ID: 15327633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Verbal representation in task order control: an examination with transition and task cues in random task switching.
    Saeki E; Saito S
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):1040-50. PubMed ID: 19744942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Investigating task preparation and task performance as triggers of the backward inhibition effect.
    Prosser LJ; Yamaguchi M; Swainson R
    Psychol Res; 2023 Sep; 87(6):1816-1835. PubMed ID: 36571593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Switching between simple response-sets: inferences from the lateralized readiness potential.
    Hsieh S; Yu YT
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 Jul; 17(2):228-37. PubMed ID: 12880894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus-category and response-repetition effects in task switching: an evaluation of four explanations.
    Druey MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):125-46. PubMed ID: 23895451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.