These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32977146)

  • 1. Application of mismatch equations in dynamic seating designs.
    Castellucci HI; Viviani C; Arezes P; Molenbroek JFM; Martínez M; Aparici V
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Jan; 90():103273. PubMed ID: 32977146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the Indonesian National Standard for elementary school furniture based on children's anthropometry.
    Yanto ; Lu CW; Lu JM
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Jul; 62():168-181. PubMed ID: 28411727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Are hybrid sit-stand postures a good compromise between sitting and standing?
    Noguchi M; Glinka M; Mayberry GR; Noguchi K; Callaghan JP
    Ergonomics; 2019 Jun; 62(6):811-822. PubMed ID: 30763145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Classroom furniture and anthropometric characteristics of Iranian high school students: proposed dimensions based on anthropometric data.
    Dianat I; Karimi MA; Asl Hashemi A; Bahrampour S
    Appl Ergon; 2013 Jan; 44(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 22695080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Garments furniture design for Bangladeshi workers considering ergonomic principles.
    Hoque M; Halder P; Rahman S; Ahmed T; Szecsi T
    Work; 2021; 70(2):657-671. PubMed ID: 34657846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The anthropometric match between high school learners of the Cape Metropole area, Western Cape, South Africa and their computer workstation at school.
    van Niekerk SM; Louw QA; Grimmer-Somers K; Harvey J; Hendry KJ
    Appl Ergon; 2013 May; 44(3):366-71. PubMed ID: 23141959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Match between classroom dimensions and students' anthropometry: re-equipment according to European educational furniture standard.
    Macedo AC; Morais AV; Martins HF; Martins JC; Pais SM; Mayan OS
    Hum Factors; 2015 Feb; 57(1):48-60. PubMed ID: 25790570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of classroom furniture to anthropometric measures of Turkish middle school students.
    Satır B; Erdoğan FÇ
    Work; 2021; 70(2):493-508. PubMed ID: 34633350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of the match between anthropometric measures and school furniture dimensions in Chile.
    Castellucci HI; Catalán M; Arezes PM; Molenbroek JF
    Work; 2015; 53(3):585-95. PubMed ID: 26835861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. School furniture match to students' anthropometry in the Gaza Strip.
    Agha SR
    Ergonomics; 2010 Mar; 53(3):344-54. PubMed ID: 20191409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mismatch between classroom furniture and anthropometric measures in Chilean schools.
    Castellucci HI; Arezes PM; Viviani CA
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jul; 41(4):563-8. PubMed ID: 20031115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Anthropometric perspective to classroom furniture ergonomics and the need for standards in Nigerian schools.
    Fidelis OP; Ogunlade B
    Work; 2022; 72(1):279-289. PubMed ID: 35431208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An investigation into the immediate effects on comfort, productivity and posture of the Bambach saddle seat and a standard office chair.
    Gadge K; Innes E
    Work; 2007; 29(3):189-203. PubMed ID: 17942990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the guidelines and children's ability to select the anthropometrically recommendable height of school furniture: A case study of Korean primary school children.
    Lee Y; Yun MH
    Work; 2019; 64(3):427-438. PubMed ID: 31683496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ergonomic evaluation of school furniture in Slovenia: From primary school to university.
    Podrekar Loredan N; Kastelic K; Burnard MD; Šarabon N
    Work; 2022; 73(1):229-245. PubMed ID: 35912766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mismatch of classroom furniture and student body dimensions: empirical findings and health implications.
    Parcells C; Stommel M; Hubbard RP
    J Adolesc Health; 1999 Apr; 24(4):265-73. PubMed ID: 10227346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Applying different equations to evaluate the level of mismatch between students and school furniture.
    Castellucci HI; Arezes PM; Molenbroek JF
    Appl Ergon; 2014 Jul; 45(4):1123-32. PubMed ID: 24560414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A biomechanical analysis of active vs static office chair designs.
    Cardoso MR; Cardenas AK; Albert WJ
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Oct; 96():103481. PubMed ID: 34102577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Classroom Furniture Mismatch and Back Pain Among Adolescent School-Children in Abha City, Southwestern Saudi Arabia.
    Assiri A; Mahfouz AA; Awadalla NJ; Abolyazid AY; Shalaby M; Abogamal A; Alsabaani A; Riaz F
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Apr; 16(8):. PubMed ID: 31003399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of the most relevant anthropometric dimensions for school furniture selection based on a study with students from one Chilean region.
    Castellucci HI; Arezes PM; Molenbroek JF
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Jan; 46 Pt A():201-11. PubMed ID: 25151312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.