BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32978632)

  • 1. Immediate Post-concussion and Cognitive Testing: Ceiling Effects, Reliability, and Implications for Interpretation.
    Gaudet CE; Konin J; Faust D
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2021 May; 36(4):561-569. PubMed ID: 32978632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the test-retest reliability of symptom indices associated with the ImPACT post-concussion symptom scale (PCSS).
    Merritt VC; Bradson ML; Meyer JE; Arnett PA
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2018 May; 40(4):377-388. PubMed ID: 28728465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of validity criteria on Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) test-retest reliability among high school athletes.
    Brett BL; Solomon GS
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Apr; 39(3):286-295. PubMed ID: 27585635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Examination of the Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test Battery.
    Nakayama Y; Covassin T; Schatz P; Nogle S; Kovan J
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Aug; 42(8):2000-5. PubMed ID: 24907286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 1 year test-retest reliability of ImPACT in professional ice hockey players.
    Bruce J; Echemendia R; Meeuwisse W; Comper P; Sisco A
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2014; 28(1):14-25. PubMed ID: 24345194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Test-retest, retest, and retest: Growth curve models of repeat testing with Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT).
    Maerlender AC; Masterson CJ; James TD; Beckwith J; Brolinson PG; Crisco J; Duma S; Flashman LA; Greenwald R; Rowson S; Wilcox B; McAllister TW
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016 Oct; 38(8):869-74. PubMed ID: 27266563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Test-Retest Reliability of a Computerized Concussion Test: CNS Vital Signs.
    Littleton AC; Register-Mihalik JK; Guskiewicz KM
    Sports Health; 2015; 7(5):443-7. PubMed ID: 26502421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The test-retest reliability of three computerized neurocognitive tests used in the assessment of sport concussion.
    Resch JE; Schneider MW; Munro Cullum C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt A):31-38. PubMed ID: 28935224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One-year test-retest reliability of the online version of ImPACT in high school athletes.
    Elbin RJ; Schatz P; Covassin T
    Am J Sports Med; 2011 Nov; 39(11):2319-24. PubMed ID: 21841066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of Computerized Neurocognitive Tests for Concussion Assessment: A Meta-Analysis.
    Farnsworth JL; Dargo L; Ragan BG; Kang M
    J Athl Train; 2017 Sep; 52(9):826-833. PubMed ID: 28771032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement Error in the Immediate Postconcussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT): Systematic Review.
    Alsalaheen B; Stockdale K; Pechumer D; Broglio SP
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2016; 31(4):242-51. PubMed ID: 26291631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-term test-retest reliability of the ImPACT in healthy young athletes.
    O'Brien AM; Casey JE; Salmon RM
    Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2018; 7(3):208-216. PubMed ID: 28631965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Test-retest reliability of four computerized neurocognitive assessment tools in an active duty military population.
    Cole WR; Arrieux JP; Schwab K; Ivins BJ; Qashu FM; Lewis SC
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2013 Nov; 28(7):732-42. PubMed ID: 23819991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A two-factor theory for concussion assessment using ImPACT: memory and speed.
    Schatz P; Maerlender A
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2013 Dec; 28(8):791-7. PubMed ID: 24123401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of a Computerized Neurocognitive Test in Baseline Concussion Testing of High School Athletes.
    MacDonald J; Duerson D
    Clin J Sport Med; 2015 Jul; 25(4):367-72. PubMed ID: 25061807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preliminary evidence of equivalence of alternate forms of the ImPACT.
    Resch JE; Macciocchi S; Ferrara MS
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2013; 27(8):1265-80. PubMed ID: 24099175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Immediate Post-Concussion and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT): a systematic review of the prevalence and assessment of invalid performance.
    Gaudet CE; Weyandt LL
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2017 Jan; 31(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 27687890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluating the suitability of the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) computerized neurocognitive battery for short-term, serial assessment of neurocognitive functioning.
    Elbin RJ; Fazio-Sumrok V; Anderson MN; D'Amico NR; Said A; Grossel A; Schatz P; Lipinski D; Womble M
    J Clin Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 62():138-141. PubMed ID: 30472342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Test-retest reliability of computerized concussion assessment programs.
    Broglio SP; Ferrara MS; Macciocchi SN; Baumgartner TA; Elliott R
    J Athl Train; 2007; 42(4):509-14. PubMed ID: 18174939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Relation Between Testing Environment and Baseline Performance in Child and Adolescent Concussion Assessment.
    Vaughan CG; Gerst EH; Sady MD; Newman JB; Gioia GA
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Jul; 42(7):1716-23. PubMed ID: 24787043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.