346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32978963)
1. Optimization of multi-electrode implant configurations and programming for the delivery of non-ablative electric fields in intratumoral modulation therapy.
Iredale E; Deweyert A; Hoover DA; Chen JZ; Schmid S; Hebb MO; Peters TM; Wong E
Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5441-5454. PubMed ID: 32978963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Planning system for the optimization of electric field delivery using implanted electrodes for brain tumor control.
Iredale E; Voigt B; Rankin A; Kim KW; Chen JZ; Schmid S; Hebb MO; Peters TM; Wong E
Med Phys; 2022 Sep; 49(9):6055-6067. PubMed ID: 35754362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Spatiotemporally dynamic electric fields for brain cancer treatment: an
Iredale E; Elsaleh A; Xu H; Christiaans P; Deweyert A; Ronald J; Schmid S; Hebb MO; Peters TM; Wong E
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Apr; 68(8):. PubMed ID: 36893468
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target.
Dmochowski JP; Datta A; Bikson M; Su Y; Parra LC
J Neural Eng; 2011 Aug; 8(4):046011. PubMed ID: 21659696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analytical and numerical quantification and comparison of the local electric field in the tissue for different electrode configurations.
Corović S; Pavlin M; Miklavcic D
Biomed Eng Online; 2007 Oct; 6():37. PubMed ID: 17937793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The optimization of needle electrode number and placement for irreversible electroporation of hepatocellular carcinoma.
Adeyanju OO; Al-Angari HM; Sahakian AV
Radiol Oncol; 2012 Jun; 46(2):126-35. PubMed ID: 23077449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of employing model-based optimization of pulse amplitude and electrode distance for effective tumor electropermeabilization.
Sel D; Lebar AM; Miklavcic D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 May; 54(5):773-81. PubMed ID: 17518273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-invasive stimulation with temporal interference: optimization of the electric field deep in the brain with the use of a genetic algorithm.
Stoupis D; Samaras T
J Neural Eng; 2022 Sep; 19(5):. PubMed ID: 35970146
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. EView: An electric field visualization web platform for electroporation-based therapies.
Perera-Bel E; Yagüe C; Mercadal B; Ceresa M; Beitel-White N; Davalos RV; Ballester MAG; Ivorra A
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Dec; 197():105682. PubMed ID: 32795723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance optimization of current focusing and virtual electrode strategies in retinal implants.
Khalili Moghaddam G; Lovell NH; Wilke RG; Suaning GJ; Dokos S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Nov; 117(2):334-42. PubMed ID: 25023532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Educational application for visualization and analysis of electric field strength in multiple electrode electroporation.
Mahnič-Kalamiza S; Kotnik T; Miklavčič D
BMC Med Educ; 2012 Oct; 12():102. PubMed ID: 23107609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma cells are vulnerable to low intensity electric fields delivered by intratumoral modulation therapy.
Deweyert A; Iredale E; Xu H; Wong E; Schmid S; Hebb MO
J Neurooncol; 2019 May; 143(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 30852713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cardiac potential and potential gradient fields generated by single, combined, and sequential shocks during ventricular defibrillation.
Wharton JM; Wolf PD; Smith WM; Chen PS; Frazier DW; Yabe S; Danieley N; Ideker RE
Circulation; 1992 Apr; 85(4):1510-23. PubMed ID: 1555291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biophysical modeling of the electric field magnitude and distribution induced by electrical stimulation with intracerebral electrodes.
Alonso F; Mercadal B; Salvador R; Ruffini G; Bartolomei F; Wendling F; Modolo J
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2023 Jun; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 37160106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Numerical optimization of gene electrotransfer into muscle tissue.
Zupanic A; Corovic S; Miklavcic D; Pavlin M
Biomed Eng Online; 2010 Nov; 9():66. PubMed ID: 21050435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Electric field distribution in a finite-volume head model of deep brain stimulation.
Grant PF; Lowery MM
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Nov; 31(9):1095-103. PubMed ID: 19656716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimized programming algorithm for cylindrical and directional deep brain stimulation electrodes.
Anderson DN; Osting B; Vorwerk J; Dorval AD; Butson CR
J Neural Eng; 2018 Apr; 15(2):026005. PubMed ID: 29235446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In-vivo estimation of tissue electrical conductivities of a rabbit eye for precise simulation of electric field distributions during ocular iontophoresis.
Lee S; Lee C; Kim E; Ko SA; Kim SN; Choy YB; Im CH
Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2022 Jan; 38(1):e3540. PubMed ID: 34672120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Particle swarm optimization for programming deep brain stimulation arrays.
Peña E; Zhang S; Deyo S; Xiao Y; Johnson MD
J Neural Eng; 2017 Feb; 14(1):016014. PubMed ID: 28068291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
