These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32979002)
1. Monitoring the ecological status of rivers with diatom eDNA metabarcoding: A comparison of taxonomic markers and analytical approaches for the inference of a molecular diatom index. Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Bouchez A; Cordier T; Cordonier A; Guéguen J; Rimet F; Vasselon V; Pawlowski J Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):2959-2968. PubMed ID: 32979002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diatom DNA metabarcoding for ecological assessment: Comparison among bioinformatics pipelines used in six European countries reveals the need for standardization. Bailet B; Apothéloz-Perret-Gentil L; Baričević A; Chonova T; Franc A; Frigerio JM; Kelly M; Mora D; Pfannkuchen M; Proft S; Ramon M; Vasselon V; Zimmermann J; Kahlert M Sci Total Environ; 2020 Nov; 745():140948. PubMed ID: 32736102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling the ecological status response of rivers to multiple stressors using machine learning: A comparison of environmental DNA metabarcoding and morphological data. Fan J; Wang S; Li H; Yan Z; Zhang Y; Zheng X; Wang P Water Res; 2020 Sep; 183():116004. PubMed ID: 32622231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diatom eDNA metabarcoding and morphological methods for bioassessment of karstic river. Kulaš A; Gligora Udovič M; Tapolczai K; Žutinić P; Orlić S; Levkov Z Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jul; 829():154536. PubMed ID: 35304150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cyprus' diatom diversity and the association of environmental and anthropogenic influences for ecological assessment of rivers using DNA metabarcoding. Pissaridou P; Vasselon V; Christou A; Chonova T; Papatheodoulou A; Drakou K; Tziortzis I; Dörflinger G; Rimet F; Bouchez A; Vasquez MI Chemosphere; 2021 Jun; 272():129814. PubMed ID: 33582508 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Genetic barcoding of Ecuadorian epilithic diatom species suitable as water quality bioindicators. Ballesteros I; Castillejo P; Haro AP; Montes CC; Heinrich C; Lobo EA C R Biol; 2020 Jun; 343(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 32720487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A taxonomy-free approach based on machine learning to assess the quality of rivers with diatoms. Feio MJ; Serra SRQ; Mortágua A; Bouchez A; Rimet F; Vasselon V; Almeida SFP Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jun; 722():137900. PubMed ID: 32199386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of two short overlapping rbcL markers for diatom metabarcoding of environmental samples: Effects on biomonitoring assessment and species resolution. Pérez-Burillo J; Mann DG; Trobajo R Chemosphere; 2022 Nov; 307(Pt 3):135933. PubMed ID: 35952789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using DNA metabarcoding to characterize national scale diatom-environment relationships and to develop indicators in streams and rivers of the United States. Smucker NJ; Pilgrim EM; Nietch CT; Gains-Germain L; Carpenter C; Darling JA; Yuan LL; Mitchell RM; Pollard AI Sci Total Environ; 2024 Aug; 939():173502. PubMed ID: 38815829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metabarcoding vs. morphological identification to assess diatom diversity in environmental studies. Zimmermann J; Glöckner G; Jahn R; Enke N; Gemeinholzer B Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 May; 15(3):526-42. PubMed ID: 25270047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Supervised machine learning improves general applicability of eDNA metabarcoding for reservoir health monitoring. Hu H; Wei XY; Liu L; Wang YB; Jia HJ; Bu LK; Pei DS Water Res; 2023 Nov; 246():120686. PubMed ID: 37812979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A taxonomy-free diatom eDNA-based technique for assessing lake trophic level using lake sediments. Gregersen R; Pearman JK; Atalah J; Waters S; Vandergoes MJ; Howarth JD; Thomson-Laing G; Thompson L; Wood SA J Environ Manage; 2023 Nov; 345():118885. PubMed ID: 37659373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation and sensitivity analysis of diatom DNA metabarcoding for WFD bioassessment of Mediterranean rivers. Pérez-Burillo J; Trobajo R; Vasselon V; Rimet F; Bouchez A; Mann DG Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jul; 727():138445. PubMed ID: 32334210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity and Ecological Health Evaluation of Diatom Community Based on eDNA]. Jiang S; Zhang Y; Li FL; Zhang XW Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2023 Jan; 44(1):272-281. PubMed ID: 36635815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Morphological vs. DNA metabarcoding approaches for the evaluation of stream ecological status with benthic invertebrates: Testing different combinations of markers and strategies of data filtering. Meyer A; Boyer F; Valentini A; Bonin A; Ficetola GF; Beisel JN; Bouquerel J; Wagner P; Gaboriaud C; Leese F; Dejean T; Taberlet P; Usseglio-Polatera P Mol Ecol; 2021 Jul; 30(13):3203-3220. PubMed ID: 33150613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. DNA metabarcoding effectively quantifies diatom responses to nutrients in streams. Smucker NJ; Pilgrim EM; Nietch CT; Darling JA; Johnson BR Ecol Appl; 2020 Dec; 30(8):e02205. PubMed ID: 32602216 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]