173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32979897)
41. Prognostic value of human epididymis protein 4 in endometrial cancer and its utility for surgical staging.
Minar L; Klabenesova I; Jandakova E; Zlamal F; Bienertova-Vasku J
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2015 Oct; 41(10):1644-52. PubMed ID: 26223178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Factors related to recurrence in non-obese women with endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma.
Panggid K; Cheewakriangkrai C; Khunamornpong S; Siriaunkgul S
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1044-8. PubMed ID: 21058438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of myometrial invasion and tumor free distance from uterine serosa in endometrial cancer.
Ozbilen O; Sakarya DK; Bezircioglu I; Kasap B; Yetimalar H; Yigit S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(2):519-22. PubMed ID: 25684481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Preoperative assessment in endometrial cancer. Is triage for lymphadenectomy possible?
Tsikouras P; Koukouli Z; Bothou A; Manav B; Iatrakis G; Zervoudis S; Galazios G; Tobias Teichmann A
J BUON; 2017; 22(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 28365933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Preoperative serum SCC, CA125, and CA19-9 levels and lymph node status in squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Takeda M; Sakuragi N; Okamoto K; Todo Y; Minobe S; Nomura E; Negishi H; Oikawa M; Yamamoto R; Fujimoto S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2002 May; 81(5):451-7. PubMed ID: 12027820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Assessment of tumor size as a useful marker for the surgical staging of endometrial cancer.
Berretta R; Patrelli TS; Migliavacca C; Rolla M; Franchi L; Monica M; Modena AB; Gizzo S
Oncol Rep; 2014 May; 31(5):2407-12. PubMed ID: 24676344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Risk factors for pelvic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.
Li Y; Cong P; Wang P; Peng C; Liu M; Sun G
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Oct; 300(4):1007-1013. PubMed ID: 31435773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The Significance of Pretreatment Thrombocytosis and Its Association With Neutrophilia in Patients With Surgically Treated Endometrial Cancer.
Takahashi R; Mabuchi S; Kuroda H; Kozasa K; Yokoi E; Matsumoto Y; Kimura T
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Sep; 27(7):1399-1407. PubMed ID: 28604454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Preoperative platelet count as index of the grading in endometrial carcinoma].
Giannella L; Menozzi G; Di Monte I; Venturini P; De Pace V; Boselli F; Ternelli G; Jasonni VM
Minerva Ginecol; 2008 Aug; 60(4):273-9. PubMed ID: 18560341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Value of gynecological cytology and CA 125 level for the prediction of extrauterine malignancy in endometrial cancer].
Brassard L; Bessette P
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2012 Jul; 34(7):657-63. PubMed ID: 22742485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Preoperative serum levels of YKL 40 and CA125 as a prognostic indicators in patients with endometrial cancer.
Kotowicz B; Fuksiewicz M; Jonska-Gmyrek J; Wagrodzki M; Kowalska M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2017 Aug; 215():141-147. PubMed ID: 28624692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Association of Serum HE4 with Primary Tumor Diameter and Depth of Myometrial Invasion in Endometrial Cancer Patients at Rajavithi Hospital.
Prueksaritanond N; Cheanpracha P; Yanaranop M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(3):1489-92. PubMed ID: 27039795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Preoperative hemoglobin and platelet count and poor prognostic factors in patients with endometrial carcinoma.
Metindir J; Bilir Dilek G
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2009 Jan; 135(1):125-9. PubMed ID: 18542999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Impact of surgical resection extent on the prognosis of clinical stage I endometrial carcinoma].
Yan X; Gao YN; Jiang GQ; Gao M; An N
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2009 Mar; 31(3):208-12. PubMed ID: 19615262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Is Surgical Staging Necessary for Patients with Low-risk Endometrial Cancer? A Retrospective Clinical Analysis.
Kokcu A; Kurtoglu E; Celik H; Kefeli M; Tosun M; Onal M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(13):5331-5. PubMed ID: 26225674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Pre-operative systemic inflammatory response markers in predicting lymph node metastasis in endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma.
Suh DH; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kang SB
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Jun; 162(2):206-10. PubMed ID: 22445206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Value of preoperative CA 125 level in the management of uterine cancer and prediction of clinical outcome.
Sood AK; Buller RE; Burger RA; Dawson JD; Sorosky JI; Berman M
Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 90(3):441-7. PubMed ID: 9277659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Evaluation of preoperative criteria used to predict lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer.
Han SS; Lee SH; Kim DH; Kim JW; Park NH; Kang SB; Song YS
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2010; 89(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 19916890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [The importance of HE4 in differential diagnosis of endometrial cancer].
Minář L; Klabenešová I; Jandáková E
Ceska Gynekol; 2015 Aug; 80(4):256-63. PubMed ID: 26265413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Risk-stratification of endometrial carcinomas revisited: a combined preoperative and intraoperative scoring system for a reliable prediction of an advanced disease.
Tuomi T; Pasanen A; Luomaranta A; Leminen A; Bützow R; Loukovaara M
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 137(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 25643690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
