These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32980895)

  • 21. Modality-specific effects of mental fatigue in multitasking.
    Mueckstein M; Heinzel S; Granacher U; Brahms M; Rapp MA; Stelzel C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2022 Oct; 230():103766. PubMed ID: 36242924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Task switching, modality compatibility, and the supra-modal function of eye movements.
    Stephan DN; Koch I; Hendler J; Huestegge L
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 23047914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. How conceptual overlap and modality pairings affect task-switching and mixing costs.
    Schacherer J; Hazeltine E
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jul; 83(5):1020-1032. PubMed ID: 29043435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Age-Related Interference between the Selection of Input-Output Modality Mappings and Postural Control-a Pilot Study.
    Stelzel C; Schauenburg G; Rapp MA; Heinzel S; Granacher U
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():613. PubMed ID: 28484411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of Input Modality on Vocal Effector Prioritization in Manual-Vocal Dual Tasks.
    Hoffmann MA; Westermann M; Pieczykolan A; Huestegge L
    Exp Psychol; 2020 Jan; 67(1):48-55. PubMed ID: 32520669
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Alternating between pro- and antisaccades: switch-costs manifest via decoupling the spatial relations between stimulus and response.
    Heath M; Gillen C; Samani A
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Mar; 234(3):853-65. PubMed ID: 26661337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cross-modal transfer after auditory task-switching training.
    Kattner F; Samaan L; Schubert T
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):1044-1061. PubMed ID: 30805872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The role of crossmodal competition and dimensional overlap in crossmodal attention switching.
    Kreutzfeldt M; Stephan DN; Sturm W; Willmes K; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Feb; 155():67-76. PubMed ID: 25577489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Talking while looking: on the encapsulation of output system representations.
    Huestegge L; Pieczykolan A; Koch I
    Cogn Psychol; 2014 Sep; 73():72-91. PubMed ID: 25003309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of task modality and stimulus frequency in paced serial addition tests on functional brain activity.
    Gielen J; Wiels W; Van Schependom J; Laton J; Van Hecke W; Parizel PM; D'hooghe MB; Nagels G
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194388. PubMed ID: 29543871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Examining binding effects on task switch costs and response-repetition effects: Variations of the cue modality and stimulus modality in task switching.
    Kandalowski SRM; Seibold JC; Schuch S; Koch I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1632-1643. PubMed ID: 31820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of physical workload and modality of information presentation on pattern recognition and navigation task performance by high-fit young males.
    Zahabi M; Zhang W; Pankok C; Lau MY; Shirley J; Kaber D
    Ergonomics; 2017 Nov; 60(11):1516-1527. PubMed ID: 28452255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. No role of beta receptors in cognitive flexibility: Evidence from a task-switching paradigm in a randomized controlled trial.
    Steenbergen L; Sellaro R; de Rover M; Hommel B; Colzato LS
    Neuroscience; 2015 Jun; 295():237-42. PubMed ID: 25818049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cross-modal stimulus conflict: the behavioral effects of stimulus input timing in a visual-auditory Stroop task.
    Donohue SE; Appelbaum LG; Park CJ; Roberts KC; Woldorff MG
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e62802. PubMed ID: 23638149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cognitive control mechanisms revealed by ERP and fMRI: evidence from repeated task-switching.
    Swainson R; Cunnington R; Jackson GM; Rorden C; Peters AM; Morris PG; Jackson SR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):785-99. PubMed ID: 14511532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Rapid cognitive flexibility of rhesus macaques performing psychophysical task-switching.
    Avdagic E; Jensen G; Altschul D; Terrace HS
    Anim Cogn; 2014 May; 17(3):619-31. PubMed ID: 24132412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Dynamic Trial-by-Trial Recoding of Task-Set Representations in the Frontoparietal Cortex Mediates Behavioral Flexibility.
    Qiao L; Zhang L; Chen A; Egner T
    J Neurosci; 2017 Nov; 37(45):11037-11050. PubMed ID: 28972126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Modality and task switching interactions using bi-modal and bivalent stimuli.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 23524240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.