209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32981992)
1. Sensitivity Analysis for Unmeasured Confounding in Meta-Analyses.
Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ
J Am Stat Assoc; 2020; 115(529):163-172. PubMed ID: 32981992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of unmeasured within- and between-cluster confounding on the bias of effect estimatorsof a continuous exposure.
Li Y; Lee Y; Port FK; Robinson BM
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Aug; 29(8):2119-2139. PubMed ID: 31694489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounding for binary outcomes using confounding functions.
Kasza J; Wolfe R; Schuster T
Int J Epidemiol; 2017 Aug; 46(4):1303-1311. PubMed ID: 28338913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of residual and unmeasured confounding in epidemiologic studies: a simulation study.
Fewell Z; Davey Smith G; Sterne JA
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 166(6):646-55. PubMed ID: 17615092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Robust Metrics and Sensitivity Analyses for Meta-analyses of Heterogeneous Effects.
Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ
Epidemiology; 2020 May; 31(3):356-358. PubMed ID: 32141922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the impact of unmeasured confounders for credible and reliable real-world evidence.
Zhang X; Stamey JD; Mathur MB
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Oct; 29(10):1219-1227. PubMed ID: 32929830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How unmeasured confounding in a competing risks setting can affect treatment effect estimates in observational studies.
Barrowman MA; Peek N; Lambie M; Martin GP; Sperrin M
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jul; 19(1):166. PubMed ID: 31366331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An E-value analysis of potential unmeasured or residual confounding in systematic reviews of post-tuberculosis mortality, respiratory disease, and cardiovascular disease.
Basham CA; Karim ME
Ann Epidemiol; 2022 Apr; 68():24-31. PubMed ID: 34973421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR UNMEASURED CONFOUNDING IN COARSE STRUCTURAL NESTED MEAN MODELS.
Yang S; Lok JJ
Stat Sin; 2018 Oct; 28(4):1703-1723. PubMed ID: 30853756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acetaminophen use during pregnancy and the risk of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A causal association or bias?
Masarwa R; Platt RW; Filion KB
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2020 May; 34(3):309-317. PubMed ID: 31916282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity analysis for the effects of multiple unmeasured confounders.
Groenwold RH; Sterne JA; Lawlor DA; Moons KG; Hoes AW; Tilling K
Ann Epidemiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):605-11. PubMed ID: 27576907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Unifying instrumental variable and inverse probability weighting approaches for inference of causal treatment effect and unmeasured confounding in observational studies.
Liu T; Hogan JW
Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Mar; 30(3):671-686. PubMed ID: 33213292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. On a preference-based instrumental variable approach in reducing unmeasured confounding-by-indication.
Li Y; Lee Y; Wolfe RA; Morgenstern H; Zhang J; Port FK; Robinson BM
Stat Med; 2015 Mar; 34(7):1150-68. PubMed ID: 25546152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions.
Ding P; VanderWeele TJ
Epidemiology; 2016 May; 27(3):368-77. PubMed ID: 26841057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing causal treatment effect estimation when using large observational datasets.
John ER; Abrams KR; Brightling CE; Sheehan NA
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):207. PubMed ID: 31726969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating Bias Due to Unmeasured Confounding in Oral Health Epidemiology.
Mittinty MN
Community Dent Health; 2020 Feb; 37(1):84-89. PubMed ID: 32031350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A FLEXIBLE SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS APPROACH FOR UNMEASURED CONFOUNDING WITH MULTIPLE TREATMENTS AND A BINARY OUTCOME WITH APPLICATION TO SEER-MEDICARE LUNG CANCER DATA.
Hu L; Zou J; Gu C; Ji J; Lopez M; Kale M
Ann Appl Stat; 2022 Jun; 16(2):1014-1037. PubMed ID: 36644682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Sensitivity analyses for unmeasured confounding assuming a marginal structural model for repeated measures.
Brumback BA; Hernán MA; Haneuse SJ; Robins JM
Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(5):749-67. PubMed ID: 14981673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Methods to Address Confounding and Other Biases in Meta-Analyses: Review and Recommendations.
Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ
Annu Rev Public Health; 2022 Apr; 43():19-35. PubMed ID: 34535060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
