These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32981992)

  • 21. Methods to Address Confounding and Other Biases in Meta-Analyses: Review and Recommendations.
    Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2022 Apr; 43():19-35. PubMed ID: 34535060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Robust Machine Learning for Treatment Effects in Multilevel Observational Studies Under Cluster-level Unmeasured Confounding.
    Suk Y; Kang H
    Psychometrika; 2022 Mar; 87(1):310-343. PubMed ID: 34652613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantitative bias analysis in practice: review of software for regression with unmeasured confounding.
    Kawabata E; Tilling K; Groenwold RHH; Hughes RA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 May; 23(1):111. PubMed ID: 37142961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Tuning Random Forests for Causal Inference under Cluster-Level Unmeasured Confounding.
    Suk Y; Kang H
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2023; 58(2):408-440. PubMed ID: 35103508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in causal mediation analysis.
    McCandless LC; Somers JM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Feb; 28(2):515-531. PubMed ID: 28882092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bayesian modeling of cost-effectiveness studies with unmeasured confounding: a simulation study.
    Stamey JD; Beavers DP; Faries D; Price KL; Seaman JW
    Pharm Stat; 2014; 13(1):94-100. PubMed ID: 24446072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sensitivity analysis of treatment effect to unmeasured confounding in observational studies with survival and competing risks outcomes.
    Huang R; Xu R; Dulai PS
    Stat Med; 2020 Oct; 39(24):3397-3411. PubMed ID: 32677758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. New metrics for meta-analyses of heterogeneous effects.
    Mathur MB; VanderWeele TJ
    Stat Med; 2019 Apr; 38(8):1336-1342. PubMed ID: 30513552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding in causal inference based on exponential tilting and super learner.
    Zhou M; Yao W
    J Appl Stat; 2023; 50(3):744-760. PubMed ID: 36819084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Sensitivity analysis method for unmeasured confounding interference in observational study].
    Wang DH; You DF; Huang LL; Zhao Y
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Nov; 40(11):1470-1475. PubMed ID: 31838823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Multiply robust causal inference with double-negative control adjustment for categorical unmeasured confounding.
    Shi X; Miao W; Nelson JC; Tchetgen EJT
    J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol; 2020 Apr; 82(2):521-540. PubMed ID: 33376449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of unmeasured confounders on the ability to estimate a true performance or selection gradient (and other partial regression coefficients).
    Walker JA
    Evolution; 2014 Jul; 68(7):2128-36. PubMed ID: 24635123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A tutorial on the use of instrumental variables in pharmacoepidemiology.
    Ertefaie A; Small DS; Flory JH; Hennessy S
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2017 Apr; 26(4):357-367. PubMed ID: 28239929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Weighted estimators of the complier average causal effect on restricted mean survival time with observed instrument-outcome confounders.
    Dharmarajan SH; Li Y; Lehmann D; Schaubel DE
    Biom J; 2021 Apr; 63(4):712-724. PubMed ID: 33346382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding for general outcomes, treatments, and confounders.
    Vanderweele TJ; Arah OA
    Epidemiology; 2011 Jan; 22(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 21052008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Model assisted sensitivity analyses for hidden bias with binary outcomes.
    Nattino G; Lu B
    Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1141-1149. PubMed ID: 29992547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Joint mixed-effects models for causal inference with longitudinal data.
    Shardell M; Ferrucci L
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(5):829-846. PubMed ID: 29205454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Adjusting for bias and unmeasured confounding in Mendelian randomization studies with binary responses.
    Palmer TM; Thompson JR; Tobin MD; Sheehan NA; Burton PR
    Int J Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 37(5):1161-8. PubMed ID: 18463132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies.
    Lin DY; Psaty BM; Kronmal RA
    Biometrics; 1998 Sep; 54(3):948-63. PubMed ID: 9750244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sharp sensitivity bounds for mediation under unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding.
    Ding P; Vanderweele TJ
    Biometrika; 2016 Jun; 103(2):483-490. PubMed ID: 27279672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.