These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32981992)

  • 41. The effect of unmeasured confounders on the ability to estimate a true performance or selection gradient (and other partial regression coefficients).
    Walker JA
    Evolution; 2014 Jul; 68(7):2128-36. PubMed ID: 24635123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Weighted estimators of the complier average causal effect on restricted mean survival time with observed instrument-outcome confounders.
    Dharmarajan SH; Li Y; Lehmann D; Schaubel DE
    Biom J; 2021 Apr; 63(4):712-724. PubMed ID: 33346382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Joint mixed-effects models for causal inference with longitudinal data.
    Shardell M; Ferrucci L
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(5):829-846. PubMed ID: 29205454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Mortality and Morbidity Effects of Long-Term Exposure to Low-Level PM
    Brunekreef B; Strak M; Chen J; Andersen ZJ; Atkinson R; Bauwelinck M; Bellander T; Boutron MC; Brandt J; Carey I; Cesaroni G; Forastiere F; Fecht D; Gulliver J; Hertel O; Hoffmann B; de Hoogh K; Houthuijs D; Hvidtfeldt U; Janssen N; Jorgensen J; Katsouyanni K; Ketzel M; Klompmaker J; Hjertager Krog N; Liu S; Ljungman P; Mehta A; Nagel G; Oftedal B; Pershagen G; Peters A; Raaschou-Nielsen O; Renzi M; Rodopoulou S; Samoli E; Schwarze P; Sigsgaard T; Stafoggia M; Vienneau D; Weinmayr G; Wolf K; Hoek G
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2021 Sep; 2021(208):1-127. PubMed ID: 36106702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding for general outcomes, treatments, and confounders.
    Vanderweele TJ; Arah OA
    Epidemiology; 2011 Jan; 22(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 21052008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparing g-computation, propensity score-based weighting, and targeted maximum likelihood estimation for analyzing externally controlled trials with both measured and unmeasured confounders: a simulation study.
    Ren J; Cislo P; Cappelleri JC; Hlavacek P; DiBonaventura M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2023 Jan; 23(1):18. PubMed ID: 36647031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Bias Analysis for Uncontrolled Confounding in the Health Sciences.
    Arah OA
    Annu Rev Public Health; 2017 Mar; 38():23-38. PubMed ID: 28125388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Model assisted sensitivity analyses for hidden bias with binary outcomes.
    Nattino G; Lu B
    Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1141-1149. PubMed ID: 29992547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Probe variables: a tool for identification of unmeasured confounders in an observational study].
    Hong X; Yin JC; Wang B
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 42(4):735-739. PubMed ID: 34814460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Bounding Bias Due to Selection.
    Smith LH; VanderWeele TJ
    Epidemiology; 2019 Jul; 30(4):509-516. PubMed ID: 31033690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Sharp sensitivity bounds for mediation under unmeasured mediator-outcome confounding.
    Ding P; Vanderweele TJ
    Biometrika; 2016 Jun; 103(2):483-490. PubMed ID: 27279672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Causal inference accounting for unobserved confounding after outcome regression and doubly robust estimation.
    Genbäck M; de Luna X
    Biometrics; 2019 Jun; 75(2):506-515. PubMed ID: 30430543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Quantitative Bias Analysis of the Association between Occupational Radiation Exposure and Ischemic Heart Disease Mortality in UK Nuclear Workers.
    de Vocht F; Martin RM; Hidajat M; Wakeford R
    Radiat Res; 2021 Dec; 196(6):574-586. PubMed ID: 34370860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Investigation of the structure and magnitude of time-varying uncontrolled confounding in simulated cohort data analyzed using g-computation.
    Soohoo M; Arah OA
    Int J Epidemiol; 2023 Dec; 52(6):1907-1913. PubMed ID: 37898996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Sensitivity analysis for interactions under unmeasured confounding.
    Vanderweele TJ; Mukherjee B; Chen J
    Stat Med; 2012 Sep; 31(22):2552-64. PubMed ID: 21976358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Negative Control Exposures: Causal Effect Identifiability and Use in Probabilistic-bias and Bayesian Analyses With Unmeasured Confounders.
    Flanders WD; Waller LA; Zhang Q; Getahun D; Silverberg M; Goodman M
    Epidemiology; 2022 Nov; 33(6):832-839. PubMed ID: 35895515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Measured and accounted-for confounding in pharmacoepidemiologic studies: Some thoughts for practitioners.
    Roy J; Mitra N
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2021 Mar; 30(3):277-282. PubMed ID: 33372303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A sensitivity analysis using information about measured confounders yielded improved uncertainty assessments for unmeasured confounding.
    McCandless LC; Gustafson P; Levy AR
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Mar; 61(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 18226747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Causal graphical views of fixed effects and random effects models.
    Kim Y; Steiner PM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 May; 74(2):165-183. PubMed ID: 33063334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Instrumental variables and inverse probability weighting for causal inference from longitudinal observational studies.
    Hogan JW; Lancaster T
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2004 Feb; 13(1):17-48. PubMed ID: 14746439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.