124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32983236)
1. Evaluation and Field Calibration of a Low-Cost Ozone Monitor at a Regulatory Urban Monitoring Station.
Masiol M; Squizzato S; Chalupa D; Rich DQ; Hopke PK
Aerosol Air Qual Res; 2018 Aug; 18(8):2029-2037. PubMed ID: 32983236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance evaluation of ozone and particulate matter sensors.
DeWitt HL; Crow WL; Flowers B
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 Mar; 70(3):292-306. PubMed ID: 31961265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the accuracy of commercially available gas sensors for the measurement of ambient ozone and nitrogen dioxide.
Isiugo K; Newman N; Jandarov R; Grinshpun SA; Reponen T
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Nov; 15(11):782-791. PubMed ID: 30156975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Field evaluations of newly available "interference-free" monitors for nitrogen dioxide and ozone at near-road and conventional National Ambient Air Quality Standards compliance sites.
Leston AR; Ollison WM
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Nov; 67(11):1240-1248. PubMed ID: 28633004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Community Air Sensor Network (CAIRSENSE) project: evaluation of low-cost sensor performance in a suburban environment in the southeastern United States.
Jiao W; Hagler G; Williams R; Sharpe R; Brown R; Garver D; Judge R; Caudill M; Rickard J; Davis M; Weinstock L; Zimmer-Dauphinee S; Buckley K
Atmos Meas Tech; 2016 Nov; 9(11):5281-5292. PubMed ID: 32802212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Spatial-temporal variations of summertime ozone concentrations across a metropolitan area using a network of low-cost monitors to develop 24 hourly land-use regression models.
Masiol M; Squizzato S; Chalupa D; Rich DQ; Hopke PK
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 654():1167-1178. PubMed ID: 30841391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of short-term exposure to air pollution on hospital admissions of young children for acute lower respiratory infections in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
; Le TG; Ngo L; Mehta S; Do VD; Thach TQ; Vu XD; Nguyen DT; Cohen A
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Jun; (169):5-72; discussion 73-83. PubMed ID: 22849236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Long-term meteorologically independent trend analysis of ozone air quality at an urban site in the greater Houston area.
Botlaguduru VSV; Kommalapati RR; Huque Z
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2018 Oct; 68(10):1051-1064. PubMed ID: 29672238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of spatiotemporal prediction models of daily exposure of individuals to ambient nitrogen dioxide and ozone in Montreal, Canada.
Buteau S; Hatzopoulou M; Crouse DL; Smargiassi A; Burnett RT; Logan T; Cavellin LD; Goldberg MS
Environ Res; 2017 Jul; 156():201-230. PubMed ID: 28359040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Statistical field calibration of a low-cost PM
Datta A; Saha A; Zamora ML; Buehler C; Hao L; Xiong F; Gentner DR; Koehler K
Atmos Environ (1994); 2020 Dec; 242():. PubMed ID: 32922146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of microenvironmental ozone concentrations in Durham, North Carolina, using a 2B Technologies 205 Federal Equivalent Method monitor and an interference-free 2B Technologies 211 monitor.
Johnson T; Capel J; Ollison W
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Mar; 64(3):360-71. PubMed ID: 24701694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A re-examination of ambient air ozone monitor interferences.
Spicer CW; Joseph DW; Ollison WM
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 Nov; 60(11):1353-64. PubMed ID: 21141429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term calibration models to estimate ozone concentrations with a metal oxide sensor.
Sayahi T; Garff A; Quah T; Lê K; Becnel T; Powell KM; Gaillardon PE; Butterfield AE; Kelly KE
Environ Pollut; 2020 Dec; 267():115363. PubMed ID: 32871483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of calibration environment on the performance of direct-reading organic vapor monitors.
LeBouf RF; Slaven JE; Coffey CC
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 May; 63(5):528-33. PubMed ID: 23786144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The London low emission zone baseline study.
Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigating the Use Of Portable Air Pollution Sensors to Capture the Spatial Variability Of Traffic-Related Air Pollution.
Deville Cavellin L; Weichenthal S; Tack R; Ragettli MS; Smargiassi A; Hatzopoulou M
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jan; 50(1):313-20. PubMed ID: 26606504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characteristics and applications of small, portable gaseous air pollution monitors.
McKercher GR; Salmond JA; Vanos JK
Environ Pollut; 2017 Apr; 223():102-110. PubMed ID: 28162801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
