120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3298359)
21. [Determination of the ejection fraction of the left ventricle by videodensitometric analysis of digital angiography. Preliminary results].
Angel CY; Vuthien H; Letienne G; Pernes JM; Brenot P; Parola JL; Raynaud A; Gaux JC
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1985 Aug; 78(8):1174-80. PubMed ID: 3935074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy of biplane axial oblique and oblique cineangiographic left ventricular cast volume determinations using a modification of Simpson's rule algorithm.
Starling MR; Walsh RA
Am Heart J; 1985 Dec; 110(6):1219-25. PubMed ID: 4072878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Determination of right ventricular ejection fraction by two-dimensional echocardiographic single plane subtraction method.
Mongkolsmai D; Williams GA; Goodgold H; Labovitz AJ
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 1989; 2(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 2698215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Videodensitometric ejection fractions from intravenous digital subtraction left ventriculograms: correlation with conventional direct contrast and radionuclide ventriculography.
Detrano R; MacIntyre WJ; Salcedo EE; O'Donnell J; Underwood DA; Simpfendorfer C; Go RT; Jones H; Butters K; Leatherman J
Radiology; 1985 Apr; 155(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 3883414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Digital subtraction angiocardiography: reliability of densitometric determination of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction].
Machnig T; Lehmkuhl H; Reynen K; Engels G; Eicker B; Barth K; Bachmann K
Z Kardiol; 1993 Jul; 82(7):443-8. PubMed ID: 8379245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Improved densitometric measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction using dual-energy digital subtraction angiography.
van Lysel MS; Miller WP; Fuerst TP; Albright DJ
Int J Card Imaging; 1994 Jun; 10(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 7963749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Videodensitometric analysis of human coronary stenoses: validation in vivo by intraoperative high-frequency epicardial echocardiography.
Johnson MR; McPherson DD; Fleagle SR; Hunt MM; Hiratzka LF; Kerber RE; Marcus ML; Collins SM; Skorton DJ
Circulation; 1988 Feb; 77(2):328-36. PubMed ID: 3338129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pressure and volume loading of the right ventricle have opposite effects on left ventricular ejection fraction.
Louie EK; Lin SS; Reynertson SI; Brundage BH; Levitsky S; Rich S
Circulation; 1995 Aug; 92(4):819-24. PubMed ID: 7641362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction by videodensitometric analysis of digital subtraction angiograms.
Tobis J; Nalcioglu O; Seibert A; Johnston WD; Henry WL
Am J Cardiol; 1983 Oct; 52(7):871-5. PubMed ID: 6353899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Left ventricular volume from paired biplane two-dimensional echocardiography.
Schiller NB; Acquatella H; Ports TA; Drew D; Goerke J; Ringertz H; Silverman NH; Brundage B; Botvinick EH; Boswell R; Carlsson E; Parmley WW
Circulation; 1979 Sep; 60(3):547-55. PubMed ID: 455617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Two-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in children.
Mercier JC; DiSessa TG; Jarmakani JM; Nakanishi T; Hiraishi S; Isabel-Jones J; Friedman WF
Circulation; 1982 May; 65(5):962-9. PubMed ID: 7074761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Usefulness of digital subtraction left ventriculography in patients with ischemic heart disease: comparison with cineangiography.
Paquet E; Bourassa MG; Lespérance J; Laurier J; Dyrda I; Lemarbre L; Bonan R; Joyal M; Corcos T
J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Dec; 35(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 6396303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging for determination of left ventricular ejection fraction and comparison with angiography.
Van Rossum AC; Visser FC; Sprenger M; Van Eenige MJ; Valk J; Roos JP
Am J Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 62(9):628-33. PubMed ID: 3414556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Digital subtraction intravenous left ventricular angiography: comparison with conventional intraventricular angiography.
Goldberg HL; Borer JS; Moses JW; Fisher J; Cohen B; Skelly NT
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1983 Mar; 1(3):858-62. PubMed ID: 6338086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Two-dimensional echocardiographic evaluation of right ventricular ejection fraction: comparison between three different methods.
Vitolo E; Castini D; Colombo A; Carini L; De Ceglia S; Tarolo GL; Boccolari S; Mana O
Acta Cardiol; 1988; 43(4):469-80. PubMed ID: 3262977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of projection and background correction method upon calculation of right ventricular ejection fraction using first-pass radionuclide angiography.
Caplin JL; Flatman WD; Dymond DS
Int J Card Imaging; 1985; 1(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 3843409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Reproducibility of echocardiographic measurements of human fetal left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions using four-dimensional ultrasound with the spatio-temporal image correlation modality.
Schoonderwaldt EM; Groenenberg IA; Hop WC; Wladimiroff JW; Steegers EA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Jan; 160(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 22018832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. A new method for evaluating right ventricular dimensions and volume by cineangiography.
Ishigaki H; Shirato K; Sakuma M; Oikawa Y; Katoh A; Nakagawa M; Hozawa H; Komaki K; Yamamoto Y; Takishima T
Tohoku J Exp Med; 1996 Dec; 180(4):289-96. PubMed ID: 9130367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Gated cardiac MRI: ejection-fraction determination using the right anterior oblique view.
Buckwalter KA; Aisen AM; Dilworth LR; Mancini GB; Buda AJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1986 Jul; 147(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 3487226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Quantitative validation of cineangiographic axial oblique biplane left ventricular volume measurement.
Pietras RJ; Kondos GT; Juska J
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1987; 13(3):157-61. PubMed ID: 3109741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
