84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32984056)
1. A Comparison of Laparoscopies and Laparotomies for Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA1-IB1 Cervical Cancer Patients: A Single Team With 18 Years of Experience.
Qin M; Siyi L; Huang HF; Li Y; Gu Y; Wang W; Shan Y; Yin J; Wang YX; Cai Y; Chen JY; Jin Y; Pan LY
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1738. PubMed ID: 32984056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial.
Campos LS; Limberger LF; Stein AT; Kalil AN
Trials; 2013 Sep; 14():293. PubMed ID: 24028441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy and safety analysis of non-radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer (IA2 ~ IB1): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zeng S; Xiao S; Xu Y; Yang P; Hu C; Jin X; Liu L
Front Med (Lausanne); 2024; 11():1337752. PubMed ID: 38745744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Zhang F; Song X
Am J Clin Oncol; 2022 Nov; 45(11):465-474. PubMed ID: 36256872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Survival Outcomes of Patients With Stage IB3 Cervical Cancer Who Undergo Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy Versus Radiochemotherapy.
Li Z; Yang Q; Guo J; Liang G; Duan H; Wang S; Hao M; Liang W; Li D; Zhan X; Xie Q; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():933755. PubMed ID: 35875125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the survival outcomes of laparoscopic, abdominal and gasless laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: trial protocol of a multicenter randomized controlled trial (LAGCC trial).
Tang X; Zhou S; Zhang X; Hua K; He Y; Wang P; Teng Y; Feng W
Front Oncol; 2023; 13():1287697. PubMed ID: 38023150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Statement of the Uterus Commission of the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO) on Surgical Therapy for Patients with Stage IA2-IIB1 Cervical Cancer.
Fehm T; Beckmann MW; Mahner S; Denschlag D; Brucker S; Hillemanns P; Tempfer C;
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 2023 Oct; 83(10):1199-1204. PubMed ID: 37808259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Surgical Approach and Use of Uterine Manipulator Are Not Associated with LVSI in Surgery for Early-stage Cervical Cancer.
Liu Y; Huang S; Ming X; Jing H; Li Z
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Sep; 28(9):1573-1578. PubMed ID: 33497723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Survival after minimally invasive surgery in early cervical cancer: is the intra-uterine manipulator to blame?
Nica A; Kim SR; Gien LT; Covens A; Bernardini MQ; Bouchard-Fortier G; Kupets R; May T; Vicus D; Laframboise S; Hogen L; Cusimano MC; Ferguson SE
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1864-1870. PubMed ID: 33037109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of Adjuvant Radiotherapy on Survival Outcomes in Intermediate-Risk, Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: Analyses Regarding Surgical Approach of Radical Hysterectomy.
Kim SI; Kim TH; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Lee TS; Jeon HW; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
J Clin Med; 2020 Nov; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 33153125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Total laparoscopic vs. conventional open abdominal nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: clinical, surgical, oncological and functional outcomes in 301 patients with cervical cancer.
Ceccaroni M; Roviglione G; Malzoni M; Cosentino F; Spagnolo E; Clarizia R; Casadio P; Seracchioli R; Ghezzi F; Mautone D; Bruni F; Uccella S
J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 32(1):e10. PubMed ID: 33300311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis.
Rodriguez J; Rauh-Hain JA; Saenz J; Isla DO; Rendon Pereira GJ; Odetto D; Martinelli F; Villoslada V; Zapardiel I; Trujillo LM; Perez M; Hernandez M; Saadi JM; Raspagliesi F; Valdivia H; Siegrist J; Fu S; Hernandez Nava M; Echeverry L; Noll F; Ditto A; Lopez A; Hernandez A; Pareja R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Apr; 31(4):504-511. PubMed ID: 33504547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A French multicentric study.
Zaccarini F; Santy A; Dabi Y; Lavoue V; Carcopino X; Bendifallah S; Benbara A; Collinet P; Canlorbe G; Raimond E; Graesslin O; Ouldamer L; Daraï E; Huchon C; Golfier F; Touboul C; Bolze PA
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2021 Feb; 50(2):102046. PubMed ID: 33340751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Beyond Sentinel Lymph Node: Outcomes of Indocyanine Green-Guided Pelvic Lymphadenectomy in Endometrial and Cervical Cancer.
Chiofalo B; Laganà AS; Ghezzi F; Certelli C; Casarin J; Bruno V; Sperduti I; Chiantera V; Peitsidis P; Vizza E
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 36834170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Learning Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy: Are We Facing an Emerging Situation?
Moufawad G; Laganà AS; Habib N; Chiantera V; Giannini A; Ferrari F; Vitagliano A; Della Corte L; Bifulco G; Sleiman Z
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Jan; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 36767419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Marchand G; Masoud AT; Abdelsattar A; King A; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Moberly A; Govindan M
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):273. PubMed ID: 36609438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of modified no-touch laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on outcomes of early stage cervical cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
He F; Yuan S; Chen X; Zhang S; Han Y; Lin T; Xu B; Huang S; Pan Z
Cancer Med; 2022 Jun; 11(11):2224-2232. PubMed ID: 35156771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Minimally Invasive Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis.
Zhang M; Dai W; Si Y; Shi Y; Li X; Jiang K; Shen J; Ying L
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():762921. PubMed ID: 35141141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A meta-analysis of survival after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: center-associated factors matter.
Sun S; Cai J; Li R; Wang Y; Zhao J; Huang Y; Xu L; Yang Q; Wang Z
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Sep; 306(3):623-637. PubMed ID: 35061066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vaginal-assisted gasless laparoendoscopic single-site radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: a retrospective pilot study.
Wang X; Li J; Hua K; Chen Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2021 Sep; 19(1):288. PubMed ID: 34579736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
