197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32984056)
21. Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Zhao Y; Hang B; Xiong GW; Zhang XW
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1132-1144. PubMed ID: 28300465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Survival outcomes of abdominal radical hysterectomy, laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and vaginal radical hysterectomy approaches for early-stage cervical cancer: a retrospective study.
Zhang N; Jin X; Yang W; Gu C; Li L; Xu J; Tang Q; Fan W; Meng Y
World J Surg Oncol; 2023 Jul; 21(1):197. PubMed ID: 37403056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical adenosquamous carcinoma at stage IA2 to IIA2: A multicenter retrospective study.
Teng X; Kang S; Li W; Ding H; Ling B; Zhu L; Wang D; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Jun; 49(6):1592-1610. PubMed ID: 36919234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on survival outcome in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer: A matching study of two institutional hospitals in Korea.
Kim SI; Lee M; Lee S; Suh DH; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Kim YB
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Oct; 155(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 31383569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Recurrence of Early Stage Cervical Cancer After Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Surgery.
Laterza RM; Uccella S; Casarin J; Morosi C; Serati M; Koelbl H; Ghezzi F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):547-52. PubMed ID: 26807638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Adverse effect of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy depends on tumor size in patients with cervical cancer.
Hu TWY; Ming X; Yan HZ; Li ZY
Cancer Manag Res; 2019; 11():8249-8255. PubMed ID: 31571982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience.
Sert BM; Kristensen GB; Kleppe A; Dørum A
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):284-291. PubMed ID: 34083029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Laparoscopic vs. Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Single-Institution, Propensity Score Matching Study in China.
Yuan Z; Cao D; Yang J; Yu M; Shen K; Yang J; Zhang Y; Zhou H
Front Oncol; 2019; 9():1107. PubMed ID: 31737563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative outcomes between robotic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for IB1 cervical cancer: Results from a single high volume institution.
Doo DW; Kirkland CT; Griswold LH; McGwin G; Huh WK; Leath CA; Kim KH
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 May; 153(2):242-247. PubMed ID: 30850169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of long-term bowel symptoms after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer.
He R; Xue Y; Zhuang X; Wang H; Lu Y
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Feb; 34(2):439-444. PubMed ID: 36094624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of Survival Outcomes after Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Cervical Cancer.
Hwang JH; Kim BW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 May; 28(5):971-981.e3. PubMed ID: 33321255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The impact of the surgical routes and learning curve of radical hysterectomy on the survival outcomes in stage IB cervical cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
Liu Y; Li L; Wu M; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Lang J
Int J Surg; 2019 Aug; 68():72-77. PubMed ID: 31220631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Choi CH; Lee JW; Lee YY; Kim HJ; Song T; Kim MK; Kim TJ; Kim BG; Bae DS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Nov; 19(12):3839-48. PubMed ID: 22644508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical adenocarcinoma].
Zhang YN; Li B; Wang YT; Liu SH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):600-608. PubMed ID: 32957748
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of the Oncological Outcomes Between Robot-Assisted and Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Based on the New FIGO 2018 Staging System: A Multicentre Retrospective Study.
Li P; Zhan X; Lv C; Lin Z; Yang Y; Wang W; Wang S; Hao M; Zhu B; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
Front Oncol; 2022; 12():879569. PubMed ID: 35847917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer stage IB1.
Kim SI; Yoo JG; Lee SJ; Park DC; Yoon JH
Int J Med Sci; 2023; 20(3):287-291. PubMed ID: 36860680
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical Outcomes in Early Cervical Cancer Patients Treated with Nerve Plane-sparing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy.
Zhao D; Li B; Wang Y; Liu S; Zhang Y; Yuan G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020; 27(3):687-696. PubMed ID: 31075445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of modified no-touch laparoscopic radical hysterectomy on outcomes of early stage cervical cancer: A retrospective cohort study.
He F; Yuan S; Chen X; Zhang S; Han Y; Lin T; Xu B; Huang S; Pan Z
Cancer Med; 2022 Jun; 11(11):2224-2232. PubMed ID: 35156771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Surgical and Pathological Outcomes of Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy With Pelvic Lymphadenectomy and/or Para-aortic Lymph Node Sampling for Bulky Early-Stage Cervical Cancer.
Zhu T; Chen X; Zhu J; Chen Y; Yu A; Chen L; Shou H; Wu M; Zhang P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 Jul; 27(6):1222-1227. PubMed ID: 28640767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative analysis of robotic
Chen L; Liu LP; Wen N; Qiao X; Meng YG
World J Clin Cases; 2019 Oct; 7(20):3185-3193. PubMed ID: 31667168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
