BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32984056)

  • 41. Lymph-Vascular Space Invasion in Patients with Stages IA2-IIA2 Cervical Cancer Treated with Laparoscopic versus Open Radical Hysterectomy.
    Zhao W; Yang Q
    Cancer Manag Res; 2021; 13():1179-1186. PubMed ID: 33603463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Postsurgical urodynamic study of total laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical cancer.
    Terada S; Terai Y; Tanaka Y; Tanaka T; Tsunetoh S; Ohmichi M
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2022 Nov; 48(11):2863-2871. PubMed ID: 35934761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Efficacy and safety analysis of non-radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer (IA2 ~ IB1): a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zeng S; Xiao S; Xu Y; Yang P; Hu C; Jin X; Liu L
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2024; 11():1337752. PubMed ID: 38745744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shazly SA; Murad MH; Dowdy SC; Gostout BS; Famuyide AO
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 138(2):457-71. PubMed ID: 26056752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Survival outcomes of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer with incidentally identified high-risk factors.
    Kim NR; Kim SI; Suh DH; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim YB; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Choi CH; Lee M
    Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jul; 174():224-230. PubMed ID: 37229880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Zhang F; Song X
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2022 Nov; 45(11):465-474. PubMed ID: 36256872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: our experience.
    Malzoni M; Tinelli R; Cosentino F; Fusco A; Malzoni C
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 May; 16(5):1316-23. PubMed ID: 19224286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Trends in Surgical Morbidity and Survival Outcomes for Radical Hysterectomy in West China: An 11-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Jing H; Yang Y; Liu Y; Zou P; Li Z
    Front Oncol; 2022; 12():836481. PubMed ID: 35223516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Surgical and oncologic outcomes between laparoscopic and radical abdominal hysterectomy for IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Quan C; Liang S; Feng Z; Zhu J; Zhang M; Huang Y
    Asian J Surg; 2023 Jan; 46(1):105-110. PubMed ID: 35367095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Concurrent Learning Curves of 3-Dimensional and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer Using 2-Dimensional Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy as a Benchmark: A Single Surgeon's Experience.
    Ding D; Jiang H; Nie J; Liu X; Guo SW
    Med Sci Monit; 2019 Aug; 25():5903-5919. PubMed ID: 31392971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Comparing thermal welding instrument-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus conventional radical hysterectomy in the management of FIGO IB1 squamous cell cervical carcinoma.
    Chen CH; Wang PH; Chiu LH; Chang WH
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2013; 34(5):442-5. PubMed ID: 24475579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of urologic complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy: A nationwide study from the National Health Insurance.
    Hwang JH; Kim BW; Jeong H; Kim H
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jul; 158(1):117-122. PubMed ID: 32354468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The institutional learning curve is associated with survival outcomes of robotic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer-a retrospective study.
    Eoh KJ; Lee JY; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim YT
    BMC Cancer; 2020 Feb; 20(1):152. PubMed ID: 32093687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A multi-institutional study.
    Casarin J; Buda A; Bogani G; Fanfani F; Papadia A; Ceccaroni M; Malzoni M; Pellegrino A; Ferrari F; Greggi S; Uccella S; Pinelli C; Cromi A; Ditto A; Di Martino G; Anchora LP; Falcone F; Bonfiglio F; Odicino F; Mueller M; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F; Landoni F; Ghezzi F
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 159(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 32665147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer.
    Li G; Yan X; Shang H; Wang G; Chen L; Han Y
    Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Apr; 105(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 17197013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Population-Based Study of Adoption and Immediate Postoperative Outcomes in the United States.
    Piedimonte S; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Gotlieb W; Abenhaim HA
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):551-557. PubMed ID: 30195078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
    Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The incidence of urologic complications requiring urologic procedure in radical hysterectomy and difference between abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
    Kim H; Jeong HJ; Kim BW; Hwang JH
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 32(6):e84. PubMed ID: 34431255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Laparoscopic Regional Radical Hysterectomy Showed Promising Clinical Outcomes in Early-stage Cervical Cancer.
    Yang W; Chen R; Li C; Li L; Luo N; Cheng Z
    Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2020; 9(4):220-226. PubMed ID: 33312866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
    Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.