These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32985291)
61. The Position and Role of Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography Angiography in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Spinal Arteriovenous Fistulas. Yamaguchi S; Takemoto K; Takeda M; Kajihara Y; Mitsuhara T; Kolakshyapati M; Mukada K; Kurisu K World Neurosurg; 2017 Jul; 103():611-619. PubMed ID: 28366753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Agreement of intracranial vessel diameters measured on 2D and 3D digital subtraction angiography using an automatic windowing algorithm. Abe Y; Yuki I; Otani K; Shoji T; Ishibashi T; Murayama Y J Neuroradiol; 2021 Jun; 48(4):311-315. PubMed ID: 31563590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Four dimensional intravenous cone-beam computed tomographic subtraction angiography. In vitro study of feasibility. Pollmann SI; Norley CJ; Pelz DM; Lownie SP; Holdsworth DW Invest Radiol; 2008 Nov; 43(11):753-61. PubMed ID: 18923254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Accelerated Time-Resolved Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Angiography of Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas Using Highly Constrained Reconstruction of Sparse Cerebrovascular Data Sets. Clark Z; Johnson KM; Wu Y; Edjlali M; Mistretta C; Wieben O; Turski P Invest Radiol; 2016 Jun; 51(6):365-71. PubMed ID: 26488372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Vessel-selective 4D-MR angiography using super-selective pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling may be a useful tool for assessing brain AVM hemodynamics. Togao O; Obara M; Helle M; Yamashita K; Kikuchi K; Momosaka D; Kikuchi Y; Nishimura A; Arimura K; Wada T; Murazaki H; Iihara K; Van Cauteren M; Hiwatashi A Eur Radiol; 2020 Dec; 30(12):6452-6463. PubMed ID: 32696254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Improved Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformation Obliteration With 3-Dimensional Rotational Digital Subtraction Angiography for Radiosurgical Planning: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Anderson JL; Khattab MH; Sherry AD; Luo G; Chitale RV; Froehler MT; Fusco MR; Cmelak AJ; Attia A Neurosurgery; 2020 Dec; 88(1):122-130. PubMed ID: 32717053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Diagnostic Performance of a Lower-dose Contrast-Enhanced 4D Dynamic MR Angiography of the Lower Extremities at 3 T Using Multisegmental Time-Resolved Maximum Intensity Projections. Raczeck P; Fries P; Massmann A; Minko P; Frenzel F; Woerner T; Buecker A; Schneider GK J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Sep; 54(3):763-774. PubMed ID: 33825259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. 3D bone subtraction CT angiography for the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: a comparison study with 2D bone subtraction CT angiography and conventional non-subtracted CT angiography. Cheng B; Cai W; Sun C; Kang Y; Gong J Acta Radiol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1127-34. PubMed ID: 25258207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Optimization of quantitative time-resolved 3D (4D) digital subtraction angiography in a porcine liver model. Meram E; Shaughnessy G; Longhurst C; Hoffman C; Wagner M; Mistretta CA; Speidel MA; Laeseke PF Eur Radiol Exp; 2020 Jul; 4(1):37. PubMed ID: 32613472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Quantification of Blood Velocity with 4D Digital Subtraction Angiography Using the Shifted Least-Squares Method. Wu Y; Shaughnessy G; Hoffman CA; Oberstar EL; Schafer S; Schubert T; Falk KL; Davis BJ; Mistretta CA; Strother CM; Speidel MA AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2018 Oct; 39(10):1871-1877. PubMed ID: 30213811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Comparison of 2D digital subtraction angiography and 3D rotational angiography in the evaluation of dome-to-neck ratio. Brinjikji W; Cloft H; Lanzino G; Kallmes DF AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Apr; 30(4):831-4. PubMed ID: 19131410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Noninvasive evaluation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations by 4D-MRA for preoperative planning and postoperative follow-up in 56 patients: comparison with DSA and intraoperative findings. Hadizadeh DR; Kukuk GM; Steck DT; Gieseke J; Urbach H; Tschampa HJ; Greschus S; Kovàcs A; Möhlenbruch M; Bostroem A; Schild HH; Willinek WA AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2012 Jun; 33(6):1095-101. PubMed ID: 22300925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Assessment of 4D MR Angiography at 3T Compared with DSA for the Follow-up of Embolized Brain Dural Arteriovenous Fistula: A Dual-Center Study. Dissaux B; Eugène F; Ognard J; Gauvrit JY; Gentric JC; Ferré JC AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2021 Jan; 42(2):340-346. PubMed ID: 33334853 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Self-supervised learning enables 3D digital subtraction angiography reconstruction from ultra-sparse 2D projection views: A multicenter study. Zhao H; Zhou Z; Wu F; Xiang D; Zhao H; Zhang W; Li L; Li Z; Huang J; Hu H; Liu C; Wang T; Liu W; Ma J; Yang F; Wang X; Zheng C Cell Rep Med; 2022 Oct; 3(10):100775. PubMed ID: 36208630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. 3D angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms before and after treatment. Initial experience. Lauriola W; Nardella M; Strizzi V; Calì A; D'Angelo V; Florio F Radiol Med; 2005; 109(1-2):98-107. PubMed ID: 15729190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Non-contrast-enhanced 4D MR angiography with STAR spin labeling and variable flip angle sampling: a feasibility study for the assessment of Dural Arteriovenous Fistula. Jang J; Schmitt P; Kim BY; Choi HS; Jung SL; Ahn KJ; Kim I; Paek M; Kim BS Neuroradiology; 2014 Apr; 56(4):305-14. PubMed ID: 24526141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Dose comparison of classical 2-plane DSA and 3D rotational angiography for the assessment of intracranial aneurysms. Guberina N; Lechel U; Forsting M; Mönninghoff C; Dietrich U; Ringelstein A Neuroradiology; 2016 Jul; 58(7):673-8. PubMed ID: 26970990 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]