These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32985780)

  • 21. Predicting effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy by stone attenuation value.
    Shah K; Kurien A; Mishra S; Ganpule A; Muthu V; Sabnis RB; Desai M
    J Endourol; 2010 Jul; 24(7):1169-73. PubMed ID: 20575686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review.
    Drake T; Grivas N; Dabestani S; Knoll T; Lam T; Maclennan S; Petrik A; Skolarikos A; Straub M; Tuerk C; Yuan CY; Sarica K
    Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):772-786. PubMed ID: 28456350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evaluation of synchronous twin pulse technique for shock wave lithotripsy: determination of optimal parameters for in vitro stone fragmentation.
    Sheir KZ; Zabihi N; Lee D; Teichman JM; Rehman J; Sundaram CP; Heimbach D; Hesse A; Delvecchio F; Zhong P; Preminger GM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2003 Dec; 170(6 Pt 1):2190-4. PubMed ID: 14634376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of diuresis on extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy treatment of ureteric calculi.
    Azm TA; Higazy H
    Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2002; 36(3):209-12. PubMed ID: 12201937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A new nomogram for prediction of outcome of pediatric shock-wave lithotripsy.
    Dogan HS; Altan M; Citamak B; Bozaci AC; Karabulut E; Tekgul S
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):84.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25812469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Preoperative stone attenuation value predicts success after shock wave lithotripsy in children.
    McAdams S; Kim N; Dajusta D; Monga M; Ravish IR; Nerli R; Baker L; Shukla AR
    J Urol; 2010 Oct; 184(4 Suppl):1804-9. PubMed ID: 20728112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Preoperative nomograms for predicting stone-free rate after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Kanao K; Nakashima J; Nakagawa K; Asakura H; Miyajima A; Oya M; Ohigashi T; Murai M
    J Urol; 2006 Oct; 176(4 Pt 1):1453-6; discussion 1456-7. PubMed ID: 16952658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteric stones in children.
    Muslumanoglu AY; Tefekli AH; Altunrende F; Karadag MA; Baykal M; Akcay M
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2006; 38(2):225-9. PubMed ID: 16868687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In situ piezoelectric extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteric stones.
    Robert M; Delbos O; Guiter J; Grasset D
    Br J Urol; 1995 Oct; 76(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 7551876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of safety and outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy between elderly and non-elderly patients.
    Chen YZ; Lin WR; Lee CC; Sun FJ; Chow YC; Tsai WK; Chiang PK; Lin TP; Chen M; Chiu AW
    Clin Interv Aging; 2017; 12():667-672. PubMed ID: 28442896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Use of ureteral stent in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper urinary calculi: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Shen P; Jiang M; Yang J; Li X; Li Y; Wei W; Dai Y; Zeng H; Wang J
    J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4):1328-35. PubMed ID: 21855945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Low success rate of repeat shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones after failed initial treatment.
    Pace KT; Weir MJ; Tariq N; Honey RJ
    J Urol; 2000 Dec; 164(6):1905-7. PubMed ID: 11061877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of power index, hydroureteronephrosis, stone size, and composition on the efficacy of in situ boosted ESWL for primary proximal ureteral calculi.
    Singh I; Gupta NP; Hemal AK; Dogra PN; Ansari MS; Seth A; Aron M
    Urology; 2001 Jul; 58(1):16-22. PubMed ID: 11445472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of YAG Laser Lithotripsy and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Treatment of Ureteral Calculi: A Meta-Analysis.
    Yang C; Li S; Cui Y
    Urol Int; 2017; 98(4):373-381. PubMed ID: 27798945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Slow delivery rate improves the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy].
    Kimura M; Shimura H; Sasagawa T
    Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai Zasshi; 2009 Sep; 100(6):625-31. PubMed ID: 19827539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Shock wave lithotripsy correlates with stone density on preoperative computerized tomography.
    Perks AE; Gotto G; Teichman JM
    J Urol; 2007 Sep; 178(3 Pt 1):912-5. PubMed ID: 17632139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children: equivalent clearance rates to adults is achieved with fewer and lower energy shock waves.
    Kurien A; Symons S; Manohar T; Desai M
    BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):81-4. PubMed ID: 18727616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Treatment protocols to reduce renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy.
    McAteer JA; Evan AP; Williams JC; Lingeman JE
    Curr Opin Urol; 2009 Mar; 19(2):192-5. PubMed ID: 19195131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of diuretics on ureteral stone therapy with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
    Zomorrodi A; Golivandan J; Samady J
    Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl; 2008 May; 19(3):397-400. PubMed ID: 18445899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparative study of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for proximal and distal ureteric stones.
    Turna B; Akbay K; Ekren F; Nazli O; Apaydin E; Semerci B; Günaydin G; Cüreklibatir I
    Int Urol Nephrol; 2008; 40(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 17647086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.