These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32986571)

  • 21. Preoperative Zung Depression Scale predicts outcome after revision lumbar surgery for adjacent segment disease, recurrent stenosis, and pseudarthrosis.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Aaronson OS; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Mar; 12(3):179-85. PubMed ID: 21937282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy with tubes to prevent undesired fusion: a long-term follow-up study.
    Dunn C; Moore J; Sahai N; Issa K; Faloon M; Sinha K; Hwang KS; Emami A
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Oct; 29(4):358-364. PubMed ID: 29957145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The Impact of Preoperative Depression and Health State on Quality-of-Life Outcomes after Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion.
    Alvin MD; Miller JA; Lubelski D; Nowacki AS; Scheman J; Mathews M; McGirt MJ; Benzel EC; Mroz TE
    Global Spine J; 2016 Jun; 6(4):306-13. PubMed ID: 27190731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Determination of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in pain, disability, and quality of life after revision fusion for symptomatic pseudoarthrosis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Anderson WN; Cheng JS; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2012 Dec; 12(12):1122-8. PubMed ID: 23158968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Quality-of-Life Outcomes following Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Fusion with and without the Use of Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2: Does Recombinant Human Bone Morphogenetic Protein-2 Make a Difference?
    Lubelski D; Alvin MD; Torre-Healy A; Abdullah KG; Nowacki AS; Whitmore RG; Steinmetz MP; Benzel EC; Mroz TE
    Global Spine J; 2014 Dec; 4(4):245-54. PubMed ID: 25396105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Preoperative Zung depression scale predicts patient satisfaction independent of the extent of improvement after revision lumbar surgery.
    Adogwa O; Parker SL; Shau DN; Mendenhall SK; Bydon A; Cheng JS; Asher AL; McGirt MJ
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):501-6. PubMed ID: 23422730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The association between the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey and real-world clinical outcomes in lumbar spine surgery.
    Levin JM; Winkelman RD; Smith GA; Tanenbaum J; Benzel EC; Mroz TE; Steinmetz MP
    Spine J; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1586-1593. PubMed ID: 28495242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Revision lumbar surgery in elderly patients with symptomatic pseudarthrosis, adjacent-segment disease, or same-level recurrent stenosis. Part 1. Two-year outcomes and clinical efficacy: clinical article.
    Adogwa O; Carr RK; Kudyba K; Karikari I; Bagley CA; Gokaslan ZL; Theodore N; Cheng JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Feb; 18(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 23231354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Factors related to subjective satisfaction following microendoscopic foraminotomy for cervical radiculopathy.
    Tonosu J; Inanami H; Oka H; Takano Y; Koga H; Yuzawa Y; Shiboi R; Oshima Y; Baba S; Tanaka S; Matsudaira K
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Jan; 19(1):30. PubMed ID: 29361919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Multilevel posterior foraminotomy with laminoplasty versus laminoplasty alone for cervical spondylotic myelopathy with radiculopathy: a comparative study.
    Lee DH; Cho JH; Hwang CJ; Lee CS; Kim C; Ha JK
    Spine J; 2018 Mar; 18(3):414-421. PubMed ID: 28882525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Patient-reported outcomes after lumbar epidural steroid injection for degenerative spine disease in depressed versus non-depressed patients.
    Kim EJ; Chotai S; Stonko DP; Wick JB; Schneider BJ; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
    Spine J; 2017 Apr; 17(4):511-517. PubMed ID: 27777051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stability-preserving decompression in degenerative versus congenital spinal stenosis: demographic patterns and patient outcomes.
    Louie PK; Paul JC; Markowitz J; Bell JA; Basques BA; Yacob A; An HS
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1420-1425. PubMed ID: 28456675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Microscopic Lumbar Foraminal Decompression: A Pilot Analysis of Possible Risk Factors for Restenosis.
    Haimoto S; Nishimura Y; Hara M; Nakajima Y; Yamamoto Y; Ginsberg HJ; Wakabayashi T
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2018 Jan; 58(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 29176269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Long-term outcomes after revision neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: defining the effectiveness of surgery.
    Mendenhall SK; Parker SL; Adogwa O; Shau DN; Cheng J; Aaronson O; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2014 Oct; 27(7):353-7. PubMed ID: 25247253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Early experience with endoscopic revision of lumbar spinal fusions.
    McGrath LB; Madhavan K; Chieng LO; Wang MY; Hofstetter CP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Feb; 40(2):E10. PubMed ID: 26828879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Back pain improvement after decompression without fusion or stabilization in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and clinically significant preoperative back pain.
    Crawford CH; Glassman SD; Mummaneni PV; Knightly JJ; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Nov; 25(5):596-601. PubMed ID: 27285666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Minimally Invasive Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy Assisted by O-Arm-Based Navigation.
    Zhang C; Wu J; Xu C; Zheng W; Pan Y; Li C; Zhou Y
    Pain Physician; 2018 May; 21(3):E215-E223. PubMed ID: 29871377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function and pain interference in spine surgery.
    Khalifeh JM; Dibble CF; Hawasli AH; Ray WZ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Aug; 31(2):165-174. PubMed ID: 31026819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Complications, outcomes, and need for fusion after minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy and microdiscectomy.
    Skovrlj B; Gologorsky Y; Haque R; Fessler RG; Qureshi SA
    Spine J; 2014 Oct; 14(10):2405-11. PubMed ID: 24486472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.