550 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32987337)
1. Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with rotational ventouse or second stage caesarean section deliveries.
Giacchino T; Karkia R; Zhang W; Beta J; Ahmed H; Akolekar R
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Nov; 254():175-180. PubMed ID: 32987337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with pregnancies delivering by non-rotational forceps.
Giacchino T; Karkia R; Zhang W; Ahmed H; Akolekar R
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 42(3):379-384. PubMed ID: 34030603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Maternal and neonatal complications following Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Giacchino T; Karkia R; Ahmed H; Akolekar R
BJOG; 2023 Jul; 130(8):856-864. PubMed ID: 36694989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Kielland's forceps: does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study.
Gauthaman N; Henry D; Ster IC; Khunda A; Doumouchtsis SK
Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1525-32. PubMed ID: 25990206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour.
Tempest N; Hart A; Walkinshaw S; Hapangama DK
BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1277-84. PubMed ID: 23906197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rotational vaginal delivery with Kielland's forceps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety outcomes.
Al Wattar BH; Al Wattar B; Gallos I; Pirie AM
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 27(6):438-44. PubMed ID: 26485456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intrapartum ultrasound during rotational forceps delivery: a novel tool for safety, quality control, and teaching.
Hinkson L; Henrich W; Tutschek B
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 224(1):93.e1-93.e7. PubMed ID: 32693095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Should we abandon Kielland's forceps?
Cardozo LD; Gibb DM; Studd JW; Cooper DJ
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1983 Jul; 287(6388):315-7. PubMed ID: 6409289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of successful Kielland's rotational forceps delivery.
Stock SJ; Josephs K; Farquharson S; Love C; Cooper SE; Kissack C; Akolekar R; Norman JE; Denison FC
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 May; 121(5):1032-1039. PubMed ID: 23635740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Kielland's forceps or ventouse--a comparison.
Herabutya Y; O-Prasertsawat P; Boonrangsimant P
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988 May; 95(5):483-7. PubMed ID: 3401434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Kielland's forceps. From controversy to consensus?
Nash Z; Nathan B; Mascarenhas L
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jan; 94(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 25233861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Kielland's forceps delivery: is it a dying art?
Tan KH; Sim R; Yam KL
Singapore Med J; 1992 Aug; 33(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 1411670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rotational delivery with Kielland's forceps.
Chow SL; Johnson CM; Anderson TD; Hughes JH
Med J Aust; 1987 Jun; 146(12):616-9. PubMed ID: 3626909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use and safety of Kielland's forceps in current obstetric practice.
Burke N; Field K; Mujahid F; Morrison JJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct; 120(4):766-70. PubMed ID: 22996093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A continuing use for Kielland's forceps?
Traub AI; Morrow RJ; Ritchie JW; Dornan KJ
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Sep; 91(9):894-8. PubMed ID: 6477848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The place of Kielland's forceps in reducing caesarean section rates.
Balchandra P; Marsh F; Landon C
Pract Midwife; 2015 Apr; 18(4):23-5. PubMed ID: 26328462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rotational delivery of the fetus: Kielland's forceps and two other methods compared.
Healy DL; Quinn MA; Pepperell RJ
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Jul; 89(7):501-6. PubMed ID: 7093162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes by Attempted Mode of Operative Delivery From a Low Station in the Second Stage of Labor.
Halscott TL; Reddy UM; Landy HJ; Ramsey PS; Iqbal SN; Huang CC; Grantz KL
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 126(6):1265-1272. PubMed ID: 26551186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality among term singletons following midcavity operative vaginal delivery versus caesarean delivery.
Muraca GM; Skoll A; Lisonkova S; Sabr Y; Brant R; Cundiff GW; Joseph KS
BJOG; 2018 May; 125(6):693-702. PubMed ID: 28692173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Neonatal and Maternal Short-Term Outcome Parameters in Instrument-Assisted Vaginal Delivery Compared to Second Stage Cesarean Section in Labour: A Retrospective 11-Year Analysis.
Polkowski M; Kuehnle E; Schippert C; Kundu S; Hillemanns P; Staboulidou I
Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2018; 83(1):90-98. PubMed ID: 28222428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
