163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32987779)
1. Prediction of the Ideal Implant Size Using 3-Dimensional Healthy Breast Volume in Unilateral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction.
Kim JH; Park JW; Woo KJ
Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Sep; 56(10):. PubMed ID: 32987779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Preoperative implant selection for unilateral breast reconstruction using 3D imaging with the Microsoft Kinect sensor.
Pöhlmann STL; Harkness E; Taylor CJ; Gandhi A; Astley SM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Aug; 70(8):1059-1067. PubMed ID: 28595842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Unilateral Tissue Expander/Implant Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction with the Assistance of Three-Dimensional Surface Imaging.
Ma JX; Xia YC; Li B; Zhao HM; Lei YT
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2020 Feb; 44(1):60-69. PubMed ID: 31598769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating Implant Volume and Mastectomy-Specimen Volume by Measuring Breast Volume With a 3-Dimensional Scanner.
Utsunomiya H; Kusano T; Sato N; Yoshimoto S
Ann Plast Surg; 2017 Jul; 79(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 28328637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is Unilateral Implant or Autologous Breast Reconstruction Better in Obtaining Breast Symmetry?
Cohen O; Small K; Lee C; Petruolo O; Karp N; Choi M
Breast J; 2016; 22(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 26534828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Study of the Relation Between Mastectomy Specimen Weight and Volume With Implant Size in Oncoplastic Reconstruction.
Wazir U; El Hage Chehade H; Choy C; Kasem A; Mokbel K
In Vivo; 2019; 33(1):125-132. PubMed ID: 30587612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is 3-Dimensional Scanning Really Helpful in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction?: A Prospective Study.
Huang DW; Chou YY; Liu HH; Dai NT; Tzeng YS; Chen SG
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Mar; 88(1s Suppl 1):S85-S91. PubMed ID: 35225853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Preoperative breast volume evaluation of one-stage immediate breast reconstruction using three-dimensional surface imaging and a printed mold.
Chen K; Feng CJ; Ma H; Hsiao FY; Tseng LM; Tsai YF; Lin YS; Huang LY; Yu WC; Perng CK
J Chin Med Assoc; 2019 Sep; 82(9):732-739. PubMed ID: 31335631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implant volume estimation in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction after nipple-sparing mastectomy.
Shia WC; Yang HJ; Wu HK; Lin SL; Lai HW; Huang YL; Chen DR
J Surg Res; 2018 Nov; 231():290-296. PubMed ID: 30278942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient Satisfaction with Implant Based Breast Reconstruction Associated with Implant Volume and Mastectomy Specimen Weight Ratio.
Baek WY; Byun IH; Kim YS; Lew DH; Jeong J; Roh TS
J Breast Cancer; 2017 Mar; 20(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 28382100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging-based breast volumetry for immediate breast reconstruction.
Kim H; Mun GH; Wiraatmadja ES; Lim SY; Pyon JK; Oh KS; Lee JE; Nam SJ; Bang SI
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Jun; 39(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 25924697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction of Implant Size Based on Breast Volume Using Mammography with Fully Automated Measurements and Breast MRI.
Kim YS; Cho HG; Kim J; Park SJ; Kim HJ; Lee SE; Yang JD; Kim WH; Lee JS
Ann Surg Oncol; 2022 Nov; 29(12):7845-7854. PubMed ID: 35723790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Objective evaluation of the latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction using three-dimensional imaging.
Henseler H; Smith J; Bowman A; Khambay BS; Ju X; Ayoub A; Ray AK
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2012 Sep; 65(9):1209-15. PubMed ID: 22525253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy of the method for estimating breast volume on three-dimensional simulated magnetic resonance imaging scans in breast reconstruction.
Rha EY; Choi IK; Yoo G
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Jan; 133(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 24374666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive value of 3D imaging to guide implant selection in immediate breast reconstruction.
Yu M; Mahoney MH; Soon G; Pinchuk B; Somogyi R
JPRAS Open; 2022 Mar; 31():50-61. PubMed ID: 34934793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-Dimensional Surface Analysis for Preoperative Prediction of Breast Volume: A Validation Study.
Stern CS; Plotsker EL; Rubenstein R; Mehrara E; Haglich K; Zoghbi Y; Mehrara BJ; Nelson JA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Dec; 152(6):1153-1162. PubMed ID: 36995175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional imaging provides valuable clinical data to aid in unilateral tissue expander-implant breast reconstruction.
Tepper OM; Karp NS; Small K; Unger J; Rudolph L; Pritchard A; Choi M
Breast J; 2008; 14(6):543-50. PubMed ID: 19054001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Single-Stage Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: A Comparison Between Subpectoral Versus Prepectoral Implant Placement.
Manrique OJ; Kapoor T; Banuelos J; Jacobson SR; Martinez-Jorge J; Nguyen MT; Tran NV; Harless CA; Degnim AC; Jakub JW
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 Apr; 84(4):361-365. PubMed ID: 31633546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the Accuracy of a 3-Dimensional Surface Imaging System in Breast Volume Estimation.
Kwong JW; Tijerina JD; Choi S; Luan A; Feng CL; Nguyen DH; Lee GK; Nazerali RS
Ann Plast Surg; 2020 May; 84(5S Suppl 4):S311-S317. PubMed ID: 32032116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Local safety of immediate reconstruction during primary treatment of breast cancer. Direct-to-implant versus expander-based surgery.
Riggio E; Toffoli E; Tartaglione C; Marano G; Biganzoli E
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Feb; 72(2):232-242. PubMed ID: 30497914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
