224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32987874)
1. Development of a Prediction Model for Demolition Waste Generation Using a Random Forest Algorithm Based on Small DataSets.
Cha GW; Moon HJ; Kim YM; Hong WH; Hwang JH; Park WJ; Kim YC
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Sep; 17(19):. PubMed ID: 32987874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of Random Forest and Gradient Boosting Machine Models for Predicting Demolition Waste Based on Small Datasets and Categorical Variables.
Cha GW; Moon HJ; Kim YC
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Aug; 18(16):. PubMed ID: 34444277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of Machine Learning Model for Prediction of Demolition Waste Generation Rate of Buildings in Redevelopment Areas.
Cha GW; Choi SH; Hong WH; Park CW
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 36612429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Artificial Intelligence Algorithm-Based Economic Denial of Sustainability Attack Detection Systems: Cloud Computing Environments.
Aldhyani THH; Alkahtani H
Sensors (Basel); 2022 Jun; 22(13):. PubMed ID: 35808184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches in composting process: A review.
Aydın Temel F; Cagcag Yolcu O; Turan NG
Bioresour Technol; 2023 Feb; 370():128539. PubMed ID: 36608858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Machine Learning-Based Boosted Regression Ensemble Combined with Hyperparameter Tuning for Optimal Adaptive Learning.
Isabona J; Imoize AL; Kim Y
Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(10):. PubMed ID: 35632184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Machine learning algorithms for outcome prediction in (chemo)radiotherapy: An empirical comparison of classifiers.
Deist TM; Dankers FJWM; Valdes G; Wijsman R; Hsu IC; Oberije C; Lustberg T; van Soest J; Hoebers F; Jochems A; El Naqa I; Wee L; Morin O; Raleigh DR; Bots W; Kaanders JH; Belderbos J; Kwint M; Solberg T; Monshouwer R; Bussink J; Dekker A; Lambin P
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3449-3459. PubMed ID: 29763967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Forecasting municipal solid waste generation using artificial intelligence modelling approaches.
Abbasi M; El Hanandeh A
Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():13-22. PubMed ID: 27297046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Developing a Prediction Model of Demolition-Waste Generation-Rate via Principal Component Analysis.
Cha GW; Choi SH; Hong WH; Park CW
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2023 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 36833851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Modeling construction and demolition waste quantities in Tanta City, Egypt: a synergistic approach of remote sensing, geographic information system, and hybrid fuzzy neural networks.
Elshaboury N; AlMetwaly WM
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Oct; 30(48):106533-106548. PubMed ID: 37726636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of artificial intelligence algorithms and their ranking for the prediction of genetic merit in sheep.
Hamadani A; Ganai NA; Mudasir S; Shanaz S; Alam S; Hussain I
Sci Rep; 2022 Nov; 12(1):18726. PubMed ID: 36333409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optimizing neural networks for medical data sets: A case study on neonatal apnea prediction.
Shirwaikar RD; Acharya U D; Makkithaya K; M S; Srivastava S; Lewis U LES
Artif Intell Med; 2019 Jul; 98():59-76. PubMed ID: 31521253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Disentangling data dependency using cross-validation strategies to evaluate prediction quality of cattle grazing activities using machine learning algorithms and wearable sensor data.
Coelho Ribeiro LA; Bresolin T; Rosa GJM; Rume Casagrande D; Danes MAC; Dórea JRR
J Anim Sci; 2021 Sep; 99(9):. PubMed ID: 34223900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Compare the performance of multiple binary classification models in microbial high-throughput sequencing datasets.
Xu N; Zhang Z; Shen Y; Zhang Q; Liu Z; Yu Y; Wang Y; Lei C; Ke M; Qiu D; Lu T; Chen Y; Xiong J; Qian H
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Sep; 837():155807. PubMed ID: 35537509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can machine learning predict pharmacotherapy outcomes? An application study in osteoporosis.
Lin YT; Chu CY; Hung KS; Lu CH; Bednarczyk EM; Chen HY
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Oct; 225():107028. PubMed ID: 35930862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Application of artificial intelligence neural network modeling to predict the generation of domestic, commercial and construction wastes.
Coskuner G; Jassim MS; Zontul M; Karateke S
Waste Manag Res; 2021 Mar; 39(3):499-507. PubMed ID: 32586206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative performance analysis of support vector regression and artificial neural network for prediction of municipal solid waste generation.
Jassim MS; Coskuner G; Zontul M
Waste Manag Res; 2022 Feb; 40(2):195-204. PubMed ID: 33818220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Statistical geometry based prediction of nonsynonymous SNP functional effects using random forest and neuro-fuzzy classifiers.
Barenboim M; Masso M; Vaisman II; Jamison DC
Proteins; 2008 Jun; 71(4):1930-9. PubMed ID: 18186470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Personal Health Information Inference Using Machine Learning on RNA Expression Data from Patients With Cancer: Algorithm Validation Study.
Kweon S; Lee JH; Lee Y; Park YR
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Aug; 22(8):e18387. PubMed ID: 32773372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Artificial intelligence algorithm comparison and ranking for weight prediction in sheep.
Hamadani A; Ganai NA
Sci Rep; 2023 Aug; 13(1):13242. PubMed ID: 37582936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
