BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32988249)

  • 1. Reduction of inter-observer contouring variability in daily clinical practice through a retrospective, evidence-based intervention.
    Patrick HM; Souhami L; Kildea J
    Acta Oncol; 2021 Feb; 60(2):229-236. PubMed ID: 32988249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development of Prostate Bed Delineation Consensus Guidelines for Magnetic Resonance Image-Guided Radiotherapy and Assessment of Its Effect on Interobserver Variability.
    Sritharan K; Akhiat H; Cahill D; Choi S; Choudhury A; Chung P; Diaz J; Dysager L; Hall W; Huddart R; Kerkmeijer LGW; Lawton C; Mohajer J; Murray J; Nyborg CJ; Pos FJ; Rigo M; Schytte T; Sidhom M; Sohaib A; Tan A; van der Voort van Zyp J; Vesprini D; Zelefsky MJ; Tree AC
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2024 Feb; 118(2):378-389. PubMed ID: 37633499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multi-observer contouring of male pelvic anatomy: Highly variable agreement across conventional and emerging structures of interest.
    Roach D; Holloway LC; Jameson MG; Dowling JA; Kennedy A; Greer PB; Krawiec M; Rai R; Denham J; De Leon J; Lim K; Berry ME; White RT; Bydder SA; Tan HT; Croker JD; McGrath A; Matthews J; Smeenk RJ; Ebert MA
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Apr; 63(2):264-271. PubMed ID: 30609205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Technology assessment of automated atlas based segmentation in prostate bed contouring.
    Hwee J; Louie AV; Gaede S; Bauman G; D'Souza D; Sexton T; Lock M; Ahmad B; Rodrigues G
    Radiat Oncol; 2011 Sep; 6():110. PubMed ID: 21906279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A review of interventions to reduce inter-observer variability in volume delineation in radiation oncology.
    Vinod SK; Min M; Jameson MG; Holloway LC
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Jun; 60(3):393-406. PubMed ID: 27170216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inter-observer variability in contouring the penile bulb on CT images for prostate cancer treatment planning.
    Perna L; Cozzarini C; Maggiulli E; Fellin G; Rancati T; Valdagni R; Vavassori V; Villa S; Fiorino C
    Radiat Oncol; 2011 Sep; 6():123. PubMed ID: 21943002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interobserver variability in rectum contouring in high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: A multi-institutional prospective analysis.
    Chicas-Sett R; Celada-Alvarez F; Roldan S; Rodriguez-Villalba S; Santos-Olias M; Soler-Catalan P; Ibanez-Rosello B; Arribas L; Tormo A; Benlloch JM; Perez-Calatayud J
    Brachytherapy; 2018; 17(1):208-213. PubMed ID: 29113782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rectum contouring variability in patients treated for prostate cancer: impact on rectum dose-volume histograms and normal tissue complication probability.
    Fiorino C; Vavassori V; Sanguineti G; Bianchi C; Cattaneo GM; Piazzolla A; Cozzarini C
    Radiother Oncol; 2002 Jun; 63(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 12142088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Intra- and inter-observer variability in contouring prostate and seminal vesicles: implications for conformal treatment planning.
    Fiorino C; Reni M; Bolognesi A; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R
    Radiother Oncol; 1998 Jun; 47(3):285-92. PubMed ID: 9681892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate bed radiotherapy planning: An inter- and intra-observer variability study.
    Barkati M; Simard D; Taussky D; Delouya G
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 60(2):255-9. PubMed ID: 26568515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic resonance imaging organ at risk delineation for nasopharyngeal radiotherapy: Measuring the effectiveness of an educational intervention.
    Ryan O; Dundas K; Surjan Y; Elwadia D; Nguyen K; Cardoso M; Kumar S
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2023 Apr; 70 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):59-69. PubMed ID: 36751021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of high dose volumetric CT to reduce inter-observer delineation variability and PTV margins for prostate cancer radiotherapy.
    Alasti H; Cho YB; Catton C; Berlin A; Chung P; Bayley A; Vandermeer A; Kong V; Jaffray D
    Radiother Oncol; 2017 Oct; 125(1):118-123. PubMed ID: 28859933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Deep Learning to Augment Image-Guided Radiotherapy for Head and Neck and Prostate Cancers.
    Oktay O; Nanavati J; Schwaighofer A; Carter D; Bristow M; Tanno R; Jena R; Barnett G; Noble D; Rimmer Y; Glocker B; O'Hara K; Bishop C; Alvarez-Valle J; Nori A
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Nov; 3(11):e2027426. PubMed ID: 33252691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Contour variation is a primary source of error when delivering post prostatectomy radiotherapy: Results of the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 08.03 Radiotherapy Adjuvant Versus Early Salvage (RAVES) benchmarking exercise.
    Cloak K; Jameson MG; Paneghel A; Wiltshire K; Kneebone A; Pearse M; Sidhom M; Tang C; Fraser-Browne C; Holloway LC; Haworth A
    J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jun; 63(3):390-398. PubMed ID: 30950223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of CBCT-based target and normal structure delineation in prostate cancer radiotherapy: multi-observer and image multi-modality study.
    Lütgendorf-Caucig C; Fotina I; Stock M; Pötter R; Goldner G; Georg D
    Radiother Oncol; 2011 Feb; 98(2):154-61. PubMed ID: 21176984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ESTRO ACROP consensus guideline on CT- and MRI-based target volume delineation for primary radiation therapy of localized prostate cancer.
    Salembier C; Villeirs G; De Bari B; Hoskin P; Pieters BR; Van Vulpen M; Khoo V; Henry A; Bossi A; De Meerleer G; Fonteyne V
    Radiother Oncol; 2018 Apr; 127(1):49-61. PubMed ID: 29496279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MRI prostate contouring is not impaired by the use of a radiotherapy image acquisition set-up. An intra- and inter-observer paired comparative analysis with diagnostic set-up images.
    Sabater S; Pastor-Juan MR; Andres I; López-Martinez L; Lopez-Honrubia V; Tercero-Azorin MI; Sevillano M; Lozano-Setien E; Jimenez-Jimenez E; Berenguer R; Rovirosa A; Castro-Larefors S; Magdalena Marti-Laosa M; Roche O; Martinez-Terol F; Arenas M
    Cancer Radiother; 2021 Apr; 25(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 33423967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inter-observer variability in target delineation increases during adaptive treatment of head-and-neck and lung cancer.
    Apolle R; Appold S; Bijl HP; Blanchard P; Bussink J; Faivre-Finn C; Khalifa J; Laprie A; Lievens Y; Madani I; Ruffier A; de Ruysscher D; van Elmpt W; Troost EGC
    Acta Oncol; 2019 Oct; 58(10):1378-1385. PubMed ID: 31271079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contouring variations and the role of atlas in non-small cell lung cancer radiation therapy: Analysis of a multi-institutional preclinical trial planning study.
    Cui Y; Chen W; Kong FM; Olsen LA; Beatty RE; Maxim PG; Ritter T; Sohn JW; Higgins J; Galvin JM; Xiao Y
    Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(2):e67-75. PubMed ID: 25413413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simultaneous
    Maclean J; Fersht N; Sullivan K; Kayani I; Bomanji J; Dickson J; O'Meara C; Short S
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2017 Jul; 29(7):448-458. PubMed ID: 28433399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.