91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32988435)
1. National Cervical Screening Program renewal in Australia: survey of clinician views and attitudes.
Sweeney S; Cheng Y; Botfield JR; Bateson D
Aust J Prim Health; 2020 Oct; 26(5):410-416. PubMed ID: 32988435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Renewal of the National Cervical Screening Program: health professionals' knowledge about screening of specific populations in NSW, Australia.
Sweeney SO; Cheng Y; Botfield JR
Public Health Res Pract; 2022 Mar; 32(1):. PubMed ID: 35291001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attitudes toward the American Cancer Society's 2020 cervical cancer screening guidelines: A qualitative study of a national sample of US clinicians.
Michel AD; Fontenot HB; Fuzzell L; Brownstein NC; Lake P; Vadaparampil ST; Perkins RB
Cancer; 2024 Jul; 130(13):2325-2338. PubMed ID: 38436396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incorporation of human papillomavirus self-sampling into the revised National Cervical Screening Program: a qualitative study of GP experiences and attitudes in rural New South Wales.
Foo YM; Goswami P; Grogin J; Hargan E; Thangarajah M; Dutton T; Mendel S; Bailey J
Aust J Prim Health; 2021 Aug; 27(4):284-290. PubMed ID: 33985644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Implementation of Australia's renewed cervical screening program: Preparedness of general practitioners and nurses.
Sultana F; Roeske L; Malloy MJ; McDermott TL; Saville M; Brotherton JML
PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0228042. PubMed ID: 31995585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Australian National Cervical Screening Program renewal: Attitudes and experiences of general practitioners, and obstetricians and gynaecologists.
Obermair HM; Bennett KF; Brotherton JML; Smith MA; McCaffery KJ; Dodd RH
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Jun; 61(3):416-423. PubMed ID: 33512715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast and cervical cancer screening: clinicians' views on health plan guidelines and implementation efforts.
Zapka JG; Puleo E; Taplin S; Solberg LI; Mouchawar J; Somkin C; Geiger AM; Ulcickas Yood M
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2005; (35):46-54. PubMed ID: 16287885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Awareness and attitudes towards the revised National Cervical Screening Program amongst women in rural New South Wales: a cross-sectional study.
Gosbell E; Panambalana A; Stephenson A; Vici C; Dutton T; Bailey J
Aust J Prim Health; 2023 Oct; 29(5):471-479. PubMed ID: 37037661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Women's experiences of the renewed National Cervical Screening Program in Australia 12 months following implementation: a qualitative study.
Dodd RH; Mac OA; McCaffery KJ
BMJ Open; 2020 Jul; 10(7):e039041. PubMed ID: 32665351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Attitudes toward cervical cancer screening among women receiving human papillomavirus vaccination in a university-hospital-based community: interim 2-year follow-up results.
Miyagi E; Sukegawa A; Motoki Y; Kaneko T; Maruyama Y; Asai-Sato M; Numazaki R; Mizushima S; Hirahara F
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Apr; 40(4):1105-13. PubMed ID: 24428631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attitudes of Colorado health professionals toward breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women.
Bakemeier RF; Krebs LU; Murphy JR; Shen Z; Ryals T
J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 1995; (18):95-100. PubMed ID: 8562228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lessons from the renewal of the National Cervical Screening Program in Australia.
Smith M; Hammond I; Saville M
Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Jul; 29(2):. PubMed ID: 31384888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The renewal of the National Cervical Screening Program.
Carter J
Med J Aust; 2016 Oct; 205(8):357-358. PubMed ID: 27736622
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Disclosing the results of the invasive cervical cancer review to patients: a survey of lead colposcopists across England.
Sherman SM; Nailer E; Pearmain P; Todd RW; Redman CW
Cytopathology; 2016 Aug; 27(4):237-41. PubMed ID: 26566859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Examining the information needed for acceptance of deintensified screening programmes: qualitative focus groups about cervical screening in Australia.
Dodd RH; Nickel B; Wortley S; Bonner C; Hersch J; McCaffery KJ
BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e029319. PubMed ID: 31630103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Report from the CDC. Pap test intervals used by physicians serving low-income women through the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
Cooper CP; Saraiya M; McLean TA; Hannan J; Liesmann JM; Rose SW; Lawson HW
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2005 Oct; 14(8):670-8. PubMed ID: 16232098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. "A Pap smear saved my life": Personal experiences of cervical abnormalities shape attitudes to cervical screening renewal.
Obermair HM; McCaffery KJ; Dodd RH
J Med Screen; 2020 Dec; 27(4):223-226. PubMed ID: 31771406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Knowledge of cervical cancer, pap testing and the human papillomavirus among young Australian women.
Shand L; Burney S; Fletcher J
Health Promot J Austr; 2010 Dec; 21(3):202-7. PubMed ID: 21118067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adherence to cervical cancer screening guidelines by gynecologists in the Pacific Northwest.
Verrilli L; Winer RL; Mao C
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2014 Jul; 18(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 24633168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Views of Irish general practitioners on screening for cervical cancer.
McDonald P; Herity B; Johnson Z; O'Kelly F
Ir J Med Sci; 2001; 170(3):186-8. PubMed ID: 12120972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
