These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32988571)

  • 1. Exploring heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Meta-regression analysis.
    Spineli LM; Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Oct; 158(4):623-625. PubMed ID: 32988571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Understanding heterogeneity in meta-analysis: the role of meta-regression.
    Baker WL; White CM; Cappelleri JC; Kluger J; Coleman CI;
    Int J Clin Pract; 2009 Oct; 63(10):1426-34. PubMed ID: 19769699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A random-effects regression model for meta-analysis.
    Berkey CS; Hoaglin DC; Mosteller F; Colditz GA
    Stat Med; 1995 Feb; 14(4):395-411. PubMed ID: 7746979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Application of Meta-regression and subgroup analyses of heterogeneity disposal in Meta-analysis].
    Shi XQ; Wang ZZ
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2008 May; 29(5):497-501. PubMed ID: 18956686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Problems caused by heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a case study of acupuncture trials.
    Prady SL; Burch J; Crouch S; MacPherson H
    Acupunct Med; 2014 Feb; 32(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 24140758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression.
    Higgins JP; Thompson SG
    Stat Med; 2004 Jun; 23(11):1663-82. PubMed ID: 15160401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A generalized weighting regression-derived meta-analysis estimator robust to small-study effects and heterogeneity.
    Moreno SG; Sutton AJ; Thompson JR; Ades AE; Abrams KR; Cooper NJ
    Stat Med; 2012 Jun; 31(14):1407-17. PubMed ID: 22351645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods.
    Thompson SG; Sharp SJ
    Stat Med; 1999 Oct; 18(20):2693-708. PubMed ID: 10521860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: needs, resources and challenges.
    Xu H; Platt RW; Luo ZC; Wei S; Fraser WD
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2008 Jan; 22 Suppl 1():18-28. PubMed ID: 18237348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A graphical method for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: application to a meta-analysis of 65 trials.
    Baujat B; Mahé C; Pignon JP; Hill C
    Stat Med; 2002 Sep; 21(18):2641-52. PubMed ID: 12228882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An overview of methods and empirical comparison of aggregate data and individual patient data results for investigating heterogeneity in meta-analysis of time-to-event outcomes.
    Smith CT; Williamson PR; Marson AG
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2005 Oct; 11(5):468-78. PubMed ID: 16164588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Methods for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Song F; Sheldon TA; Sutton AJ; Abrams KR; Jones DR
    Eval Health Prof; 2001 Jun; 24(2):126-51. PubMed ID: 11523383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Covariate heterogeneity in meta-analysis: criteria for deciding between meta-regression and individual patient data.
    Simmonds MC; Higgins JP
    Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(15):2982-99. PubMed ID: 17195960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Approaches to heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    Petitti DB
    Stat Med; 2001 Dec; 20(23):3625-33. PubMed ID: 11746342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improved tests for a random effects meta-regression with a single covariate.
    Knapp G; Hartung J
    Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2693-710. PubMed ID: 12939780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exploring heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Subgroup analysis. Part 1.
    Spineli LM; Pandis N
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Aug; 158(2):302-304.e1. PubMed ID: 32620480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Seeing the forests and the trees--innovative approaches to exploring heterogeneity in systematic reviews of complex interventions to enhance health system decision-making: a protocol.
    Ivers N; Tricco AC; Trikalinos TA; Dahabreh IJ; Danko KJ; Moher D; Straus SE; Lavis JN; Yu CH; Shojania K; Manns B; Tonelli M; Ramsay T; Edwards A; Sargious P; Paprica A; Hillmer M; Grimshaw JM
    Syst Rev; 2014 Aug; 3():88. PubMed ID: 25115289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis.
    Peters JL; Sutton AJ; Jones DR; Abrams KR; Rushton L
    JAMA; 2006 Feb; 295(6):676-80. PubMed ID: 16467236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring heterogeneity in meta-analysis: is the L'Abbé plot useful?
    Song F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1999 Aug; 52(8):725-30. PubMed ID: 10465316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dealing with clinical heterogeneity in meta-analysis. Assumptions, methods, interpretation.
    Kriston L
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2013 Mar; 22(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 23494781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.