152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32988673)
1. Multiparametric Ultrasound for Targeting Prostate Cancer: Combining ARFI, SWEI, QUS and B-Mode.
Morris DC; Chan DY; Lye TH; Chen H; Palmeri ML; Polascik TJ; Foo WC; Huang J; Mamou J; Nightingale KR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 46(12):3426-3439. PubMed ID: 32988673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automated multiparametric localization of prostate cancer based on B-mode, shear-wave elastography, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound radiomics.
Wildeboer RR; Mannaerts CK; van Sloun RJG; Budäus L; Tilki D; Wijkstra H; Salomon G; Mischi M
Eur Radiol; 2020 Feb; 30(2):806-815. PubMed ID: 31602512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate Cancer Detection Using 3-D Shear Wave Elasticity Imaging.
Morris DC; Chan DY; Palmeri ML; Polascik TJ; Foo WC; Nightingale KR
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1670-1680. PubMed ID: 33832823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combined ARFI and Shear Wave Imaging of Prostate Cancer: Optimizing Beam Sequences and Parameter Reconstruction Approaches.
Chan DY; Morris DC; Polascik TJ; Palmeri ML; Nightingale KR
Ultrason Imaging; 2023 Jul; 45(4):175-186. PubMed ID: 37129257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiparametric Ultrasound for Prostate Cancer Detection and Localization: Correlation of B-mode, Shear Wave Elastography and Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound with Radical Prostatectomy Specimens.
Mannaerts CK; Wildeboer RR; Remmers S; van Kollenburg RAA; Kajtazovic A; Hagemann J; Postema AW; van Sloun RJG; J Roobol M; Tilki D; Mischi M; Wijkstra H; Salomon G
J Urol; 2019 Dec; 202(6):1166-1173. PubMed ID: 31246546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Detection of prostate cancer by real-time MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy: 3T MRI and state of the art sonography].
Durmus T; Stephan C; Grigoryev M; Diederichs G; Saleh M; Slowinski T; Maxeiner A; Thomas A; Fischer T
Rofo; 2013 May; 185(5):428-33. PubMed ID: 23420313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterizing stiffness of human prostates using acoustic radiation force.
Zhai L; Madden J; Foo WC; Mouraviev V; Polascik TJ; Palmeri ML; Nightingale KR
Ultrason Imaging; 2010 Oct; 32(4):201-13. PubMed ID: 21213566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Stabile A; Dell'Oglio P; De Cobelli F; Esposito A; Gandaglia G; Fossati N; Brembilla G; Cristel G; Cardone G; Deho' F; Losa A; Suardi N; Gaboardi F; Del Maschio A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 May; 1(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 31100225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Head-to-head Comparison of Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy Versus Multiparametric Prostate Resonance Imaging with Subsequent Magnetic Resonance-guided Biopsy in Biopsy-naïve Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen: A Large Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study.
van der Leest M; Cornel E; Israël B; Hendriks R; Padhani AR; Hoogenboom M; Zamecnik P; Bakker D; Setiasti AY; Veltman J; van den Hout H; van der Lelij H; van Oort I; Klaver S; Debruyne F; Sedelaar M; Hannink G; Rovers M; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO
Eur Urol; 2019 Apr; 75(4):570-578. PubMed ID: 30477981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can multiparametric ultrasound improve cognitive MRI/TRUS fusion prostate biopsy.
Pepe P; Pepe L; Panella P; Pennisi M
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2020 Jun; 92(2):. PubMed ID: 32597106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial.
Tonttila PP; Lantto J; Pääkkö E; Piippo U; Kauppila S; Lammentausta E; Ohtonen P; Vaarala MH
Eur Urol; 2016 Mar; 69(3):419-25. PubMed ID: 26033153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of complications rates between multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion and systematic TRUS prostatic biopsies.
Queiroz MRG; Falsarella PM; Mariotti GC; Lemos GC; Baroni RH; Mussi TC; Garcia RG
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Feb; 44(2):732-738. PubMed ID: 30255444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MRI-TRUS fusion biopsy of the prostate: Quality of image fusion in a clinical setting.
Schlenker B; Apfelbeck M; Buchner A; Stief C; Clevert DA
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2018; 70(4):433-440. PubMed ID: 30347605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Elastic Versus Rigid Image Registration in Magnetic Resonance Imaging-transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Venderink W; de Rooij M; Sedelaar JPM; Huisman HJ; Fütterer JJ
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Mar; 4(2):219-227. PubMed ID: 28753777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Single Center Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging against Transperineal Prostate Mapping Biopsy: An Analysis of Men with Benign Histology and Insignificant Cancer following Transrectal Ultrasound Biopsy.
Pal RP; Ahmad R; Trecartan S; Voss J; Ahmed S; Bazo A; Lloyd J; Walton TJ
J Urol; 2018 Aug; 200(2):302-308. PubMed ID: 29477717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cancer Location in Upgrading and Detection after Transperineal Template-Guided Mapping Biopsy for Patients in Active Surveillance and Negative Transrectal Ultrasonography-Guided Prostate Biopsy.
Lee CU; Sung SH; Jang CT; Kang M; Sung HH; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Jeon SS; Lee HM; Jeon HG
Urol Int; 2019; 103(3):262-269. PubMed ID: 31269509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies.
Arsov C; Rabenalt R; Blondin D; Quentin M; Hiester A; Godehardt E; Gabbert HE; Becker N; Antoch G; Albers P; Schimmöller L
Eur Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(4):713-20. PubMed ID: 26116294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk-based Patient Selection for Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Prostate Biopsy after Negative Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Random Biopsy Avoids Unnecessary Magnetic Resonance Imaging Scans.
Alberts AR; Schoots IG; Bokhorst LP; van Leenders GJ; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1129-34. PubMed ID: 26651990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
