These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32989310)
1. What Trump's Supreme Court pick could mean for science. Subbaraman N Nature; 2020 Oct; 586(7828):183-184. PubMed ID: 32989310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Handicapping the odds on the future of Roe v. Wade: can the right to abortion survive in the High Court? Drenning MG Health Care Law Mon; 2003 Mar; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12698761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The argument that never ends. Simon R US News World Rep; 2003 Jan; 134(2):24. PubMed ID: 12561696 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. State Abortion Restrictions and the New Supreme Court: Women's Access to Reproductive Health Services. Reingold RB; Gostin LO JAMA; 2019 Jul; 322(1):21-22. PubMed ID: 31166573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Speech, privacy, and the power of the purse: lessons from the abortion "gag rule" case. Wing KR J Health Polit Policy Law; 1992; 17(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 1619248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The right's reasons: constitutional conflict and the spread of woman-protective antiabortion argument. Siegel RB Duke Law J; 2008 Apr; 57(6):1641-92. PubMed ID: 19108356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. What will Donald Trump's presidency mean for health? A scorecard. McKee M; Greer SL; Stuckler D Lancet; 2017 Feb; 389(10070):748-754. PubMed ID: 28109540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care. Poppema ST MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care. Gartner EC MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159623 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Health Policy in the Supreme Court and a New Conservative Majority. Gostin LO; Parmet WE; Rosenbaum S JAMA; 2020 Dec; 324(21):2157-2158. PubMed ID: 33107902 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Biden has assembled a stellar science team - now they must pull together. Nature; 2021 Feb; 590(7844):7-8. PubMed ID: 33536655 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. US Supreme Court hobbles the EPA's authority over climate emissions. Tollefson J Nature; 2022 Jul; 607(7918):222-223. PubMed ID: 35773487 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How Trump damaged science - and why it could take decades to recover. Tollefson J Nature; 2020 Oct; 586(7828):190-194. PubMed ID: 33020603 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Science under siege: behind the scenes at Trump's troubled environment agency. Tollefson J Nature; 2018 Jul; 559(7714):316-319. PubMed ID: 30002470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The partial death of abortion rights. Charo RA N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2125-8. PubMed ID: 17452437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Equality theory and reproductive freedom. Colker R Tex J Women Law; 1994; 3(1):99-122. PubMed ID: 12645608 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]