These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32989310)

  • 21. Four-one-four.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(5):27-9. PubMed ID: 2793440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Pro-choice: a new militancy.
    Davis SE
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1989; 19(6):32-3. PubMed ID: 2606658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Forgotten Supreme Court abortion cases: Drs. Hawker & Hurwitz in the dock & defrocked.
    Lucas R
    Spec Law Dig Health Care Law; 2005 Jun; (314):9-38. PubMed ID: 16173382
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The intimidation of American physicians--banning partial-birth abortion.
    Greene MF
    N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(21):2128-9. PubMed ID: 17452436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Social work and the Supreme Court: a clash of values; a time for action.
    Lens V
    Soc Work; 2004 Apr; 49(2):327-30. PubMed ID: 15124975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Roe v. Wade at twenty-nine: the future of abortion rights in the U.S. remains an open question.
    Drenning MG
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Feb; ():6-7. PubMed ID: 12436734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Casey and its impact on abortion regulation.
    Moses MF
    Fordham Urban Law J; 2004 Mar; 31(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 16700123
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The right to privacy: Roe v. Wade revisited.
    Smith PA
    Jurist; 1983; 43(2):289-317. PubMed ID: 16086474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court. Conclusion: the future of abortion as a "private choice".
    Grant ER
    Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):233-43. PubMed ID: 2603867
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights.
    Reilly EA
    Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stenberg v Carhart: a divided US Supreme Court debates partial birth abortion.
    Heffernan L
    Mod Law Rev; 2001 Jul; 64(4):618-27. PubMed ID: 16538739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inside the US Supreme Court's war on science.
    Tollefson J
    Nature; 2022 Sep; 609(7927):460-462. PubMed ID: 36104405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Supreme Court and the Partial-birth Abortion Ban Act of 2003: a political procedure replaces woman-centered care.
    Nordholm S
    MedGenMed; 2007; 9(3):41; author reply 41. PubMed ID: 18159624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The United States Supreme Court and health law: the year in review.
    Ruger TW
    J Law Med Ethics; 2006; 34(4):817-20. PubMed ID: 17199824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Trump's high court nominee's opinions may signal opposition to abortion rights and assisted suicide.
    Castellucci M
    Mod Healthc; 2017 Feb; 47(6):10-11. PubMed ID: 30715807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The abortion right, originalism, and the Fourteenth Amendment.
    Graines S; Wyatt J
    Clevel State Law Rev; 1999; 47(2):161-91. PubMed ID: 12715815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implications of the Federal Abortion Ban for Women's Health in the United States.
    Weitz TA; Yanow S
    Reprod Health Matters; 2008 May; 16(31 Suppl):99-107. PubMed ID: 18772090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt.
    Harv Law Rev; 2016 Nov; 130(1):397-406. PubMed ID: 28117562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The abortion battle: the Canadian scene.
    Sachdev P
    Med Law; 1994; 13(1-2):1-9. PubMed ID: 8065237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prenatal v. parental rights: what a difference an "a" makes.
    Gallagher A
    St Marys Law J; 1989; 21(2):301-24. PubMed ID: 16100799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.