These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32989545)

  • 21. Impact of surgeon and hospital factors on length of stay after colorectal surgery systematic review.
    Bayat Z; Guidolin K; Elsolh B; De Castro C; Kennedy E; Govindarajan A
    BJS Open; 2022 Sep; 6(5):. PubMed ID: 36124901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Workload and surgeon's specialty for outcome after colorectal cancer surgery.
    Archampong D; Borowski D; Wille-Jørgensen P; Iversen LH
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Mar; (3):CD005391. PubMed ID: 22419309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Minimally invasive posterior lumbar surgery in the morbidly obese, obese and non-obese populations: A single institution retrospective review.
    Molina E; Zhao D; Dowlati E; Carroll AH; Mueller KB; Sandhu FA; Voyadzis JM
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 207():106746. PubMed ID: 34144463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mechanisms of age and race differences in receiving minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair.
    Vu JV; Gunaseelan V; Dimick JB; Englesbe MJ; Campbell DA; Telem DA
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Dec; 33(12):4032-4037. PubMed ID: 30767140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mini-invasive
    Ye SP; Qiu H; Liao SJ; Ai JH; Shi J
    World J Gastroenterol; 2019 Jun; 25(22):2819-2832. PubMed ID: 31236004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Association of hospital factors and socioeconomic status with the utilization of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer over a decade.
    Patel R; Pant K; Patel KS; Merchant AM; Alvarez-Downing MM
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):3750-3762. PubMed ID: 34462866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. National differences in implementation of minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer and the influence on short-term outcomes.
    Warps AK; Saraste D; Westerterp M; Detering R; Sjövall A; Martling A; Dekker JWT; Tollenaar RAEM; Matthiessen P; Tanis PJ;
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):5986-6001. PubMed ID: 35258664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: Hospital Type Drives Utilization and Outcomes.
    Villano AM; Zeymo A; Houlihan BK; Bayasi M; Al-Refaie WB; Chan KS
    J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():180-189. PubMed ID: 31753556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Same-day discharge after minimal invasive hysterectomy: Applications for improved value of care.
    Qi M; Lopa S; Adambekov S; Harris JA; Mansuria S; Edwards RP; Linkov F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Apr; 259():140-145. PubMed ID: 33667895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Contemporary Analysis of Ureteral Reconstruction 30-Day Morbidity Utilizing the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database: Comparison of Minimally Invasive
    Hebert KJ; Linder BJ; Gettman MT; Ubl D; Habermann EB; Lyon TD; Ziegelmann MJ; Viers BR
    J Endourol; 2022 Feb; 36(2):209-215. PubMed ID: 34663084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Analysis of Bi-National Colorectal Cancer Audit Data.
    Bedrikovetski S; Dudi-Venkata NN; Kroon HM; Moore JW; Hunter RA; Sammour T
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2020 Jun; 63(6):778-787. PubMed ID: 32109916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: one surgeon's learning curve.
    Nandyala SV; Fineberg SJ; Pelton M; Singh K
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1460-5. PubMed ID: 24290313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Laparoscopic Colectomy for Acute Diverticulitis in the Urgent Setting is Associated with Similar Outcomes to Open.
    Hajirawala LN; Moreci R; Leonardi C; Bevier-Rawls ER; Orangio GR; Davis KG; Barton JS; Klinger AL
    Am Surg; 2022 May; 88(5):901-907. PubMed ID: 34727724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Minimally invasive versus open surgery in the Medicare population: a comparison of post-operative and economic outcomes.
    Fan CJ; Chien HL; Weiss MJ; He J; Wolfgang CL; Cameron JL; Pawlik TM; Makary MA
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Sep; 32(9):3874-3880. PubMed ID: 29484556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Insurance status does not affect short-term outcomes after oncological colorectal surgery in Europe, but influences the use of minimally invasive techniques: a propensity score-matched analysis.
    Schneider MA; Rickenbacher A; Frick L; Cabalzar-Wondberg D; Käser S; Clavien PA; Turina M
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2018 Nov; 403(7):863-872. PubMed ID: 30361827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An analysis of the differences in the acute hospitalization charges following minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
    Wang MY; Cummock MD; Yu Y; Trivedi RA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):694-9. PubMed ID: 20515357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Patient Perceptions of Minimally Invasive Versus Open Spine Surgery.
    Narain AS; Hijji FY; Duhancioglu G; Haws BE; Khechen B; Manning BT; Colman MW; Singh K
    Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Apr; 31(3):E184-E192. PubMed ID: 29465423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for early gastric cancer are comparable with those for open surgery: analysis of 1,013 minimally invasive surgeries at a single institution.
    Oh SY; Kwon S; Lee KG; Suh YS; Choe HN; Kong SH; Lee HJ; Kim WH; Yang HK
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Mar; 28(3):789-95. PubMed ID: 24263458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.