These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32989564)

  • 1. Pairwise relatedness testing in the context of inbreeding: expectation and variance of the likelihood ratio.
    Brustad HK; Vigeland MD; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2021 Jan; 135(1):117-129. PubMed ID: 32989564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relatedness coefficients in pedigrees with inbred founders.
    Vigeland MD
    J Math Biol; 2020 Jul; 81(1):185-207. PubMed ID: 32514944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The likelihood ratio as a random variable for linked markers in kinship analysis.
    Egeland T; Slooten K
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Nov; 130(6):1445-1456. PubMed ID: 27519910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. QuickPed: an online tool for drawing pedigrees and analysing relatedness.
    Vigeland MD
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Jun; 23(1):220. PubMed ID: 35672681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quantitative trait locus analysis of hybrid pedigrees: variance-components model, inbreeding parameter, and power.
    Svischeva GR
    BMC Genet; 2007 Jul; 8():50. PubMed ID: 17651509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Efficient computation of the kinship coefficients.
    Kirkpatrick B; Ge S; Wang L
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Mar; 35(6):1002-1008. PubMed ID: 30165566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The limitations of kinship determinations using STR data in ill-defined populations.
    Zvénigorosky V; Sabbagh A; Gonzalez A; Fausser JL; Palstra F; Romanov G; Solovyev A; Barashkov N; Fedorova S; Crubézy É; Ludes B; Keyser C
    Int J Legal Med; 2020 Nov; 134(6):1981-1990. PubMed ID: 32318826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-locus identity coefficients in pedigrees.
    Vigeland MD
    G3 (Bethesda); 2023 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 36525359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Key individuals for discerning pedigrees belonging to the same autosomal kinship class.
    Gonçalves J; Conde-Sousa E; Egeland T; Amorim A; Pinto N
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2017 Jul; 29():71-79. PubMed ID: 28380400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Weight-of-evidence for DNA identification of missing persons and human remains using CODIS.
    Starinsky-Elbaz S; Ram T; Voskoboinik L; Pasternak Z
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2020 Sep; 16(3):389-394. PubMed ID: 32394209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Parent-offspring inference in inbred populations.
    Runge JN; König B; Lindholm AK; Bendesky A
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2022 Nov; 22(8):2981-2993. PubMed ID: 35770342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pairwise kinship testing with microhaplotypes: Can advancements be made in kinship inference with these markers?
    Wu R; Chen H; Li R; Zang Y; Shen X; Hao B; Wang Q; Sun H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Aug; 325():110875. PubMed ID: 34166816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The analogy between DNA kinship and DNA mixture evaluation, with applications for the interpretation of likelihood ratios produced by possibly imperfect models.
    Slooten K
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 May; 52():102449. PubMed ID: 33517022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inbreeding coefficient estimation with dense SNP data: comparison of strategies and application to HapMap III.
    Gazal S; Sahbatou M; Perdry H; Letort S; Génin E; Leutenegger AL
    Hum Hered; 2014; 77(1-4):49-62. PubMed ID: 25060269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Strategies for pairwise searches in forensic kinship analysis.
    Brustad HK; Colucci M; Jobling MA; Sheehan NA; Egeland T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Sep; 54():102562. PubMed ID: 34274795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. GRAIN: a computer program to calculate ancestral and partial inbreeding coefficients using a gene dropping approach.
    Baumung R; Farkas J; Boichard D; Mészáros G; Sölkner J; Curik I
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2015 Apr; 132(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 25823836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimizing the information increase through the addition of relatives and genetic markers in identification and kinship cases.
    Pinto N; Simões R; Amorim A; Conde-Sousa E
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 May; 40():210-218. PubMed ID: 30921688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exclusion probabilities and likelihood ratios with applications to kinship problems.
    Slooten KJ; Egeland T
    Int J Legal Med; 2014 May; 128(3):415-25. PubMed ID: 24281752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. MIM: an indirect method to assess inbreeding and coancestry in large incomplete pedigrees of selected dairy cattle.
    Colleau JJ; Sargolzaei M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2011 Jun; 128(3):163-73. PubMed ID: 21554410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.