These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32989718)
1. Precise/not precise (PNP): A Brunswikian model that uses judgment error distributions to identify cognitive processes. Sundh J; Collsiöö A; Millroth P; Juslin P Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Apr; 28(2):351-373. PubMed ID: 32989718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Brunswikian resources for event-perception research. Kirlik A Perception; 2009; 38(3):376-98. PubMed ID: 19485133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Thurstonian and Brunswikian origins of uncertainty in judgment: a sampling model of confidence in sensory discrimination. Juslin P; Olsson H Psychol Rev; 1997 Apr; 104(2):344-66. PubMed ID: 9162950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intuitive and deliberate judgments are based on common principles. Kruglanski AW; Gigerenzer G Psychol Rev; 2011 Jan; 118(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 21244188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What do the theories of Egon Brunswik have to say to medical education? Wigton RS Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2008 Mar; 13(1):109-21. PubMed ID: 16897558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Bifocal Lens Model and Equation: Examining the Linkage between Clinical Judgments and Decisions. Beckstead JW Med Decis Making; 2017 Jan; 37(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 27765897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can cognitive psychological research on reasoning enhance the discussion around moral judgments? Bialek M; Terbeck S Cogn Process; 2016 Aug; 17(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 27016146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The curious anomaly of skewed judgment distributions and systematic error in the wisdom of crowds. Nash UW PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112386. PubMed ID: 25406078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Determinants of linear judgment: a meta-analysis of lens model studies. Karelaia N; Hogarth RM Psychol Bull; 2008 May; 134(3):404-26. PubMed ID: 18444703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breaking the perceptual-conceptual barrier: Relational matching and working memory. Smith JD; Jackson BN; Church BA Mem Cognit; 2019 Apr; 47(3):544-560. PubMed ID: 30632014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Confidence as a diagnostic tool for perceptual aftereffects. Gallagher RM; Suddendorf T; Arnold DH Sci Rep; 2019 May; 9(1):7124. PubMed ID: 31073187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Combining meta-learned models with process models of cognition. Sanborn AN; Yan H; Tsvetkov C Behav Brain Sci; 2024 Sep; 47():e163. PubMed ID: 39311516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of nutrition judgments using the Nutrition Facts Panel. González-Vallejo C; Lavins BD; Carter KA Appetite; 2016 Oct; 105():71-84. PubMed ID: 27212672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The secret life of fluency. Oppenheimer DM Trends Cogn Sci; 2008 Jun; 12(6):237-41. PubMed ID: 18468944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is There Evidence for a Mixture of Processes in Speed-Accuracy Trade-Off Behavior? van Maanen L Top Cogn Sci; 2016 Jan; 8(1):279-90. PubMed ID: 26748686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Understanding perceptual judgment in autism spectrum disorder using the drift diffusion model. Pirrone A; Dickinson A; Gomez R; Stafford T; Milne E Neuropsychology; 2017 Feb; 31(2):173-180. PubMed ID: 27732040 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wisdom of crowds benefits perceptual decision making across difficulty levels. Saha Roy T; Mazumder S; Das K Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):538. PubMed ID: 33436921 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Do children profit from looking beyond looks? From similarity-based to cue abstraction processes in multiple-cue judgment. von Helversen B; Mata R; Olsson H Dev Psychol; 2010 Jan; 46(1):220-9. PubMed ID: 20053019 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]